iSQI CTFL-AT Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

From theCTFL-AT Syllabus v4.0, Section 1.3The Whole-Team Approach, it states:

"The whole-team approach involves all team members (including developers, testers, and business representatives) working together as a team, sharing responsibility for the quality of the product."

It also says:

"In Agile projects, the whole-team approach promotes collaboration and communication across roles to achieve common goals, including quality assurance."

Thus,Option Bis correct, as it captures thecollaborative nature and shared responsibilitythat the whole-team approach aims to foster.

Option Arefers toPlanning Poker or relative estimation, not directly the whole-team concept.

Option Cdescribes the"Three Cs" (Card, Conversation, Confirmation)model of user stories, not the whole-team approach specifically.

Option Dmisinterprets Agile; while team members are encouraged to becross-functional, deep expertise is still valued, and "generalist only" is not a requirement of the whole-team approach.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

From theISTQB CTFL-AT Syllabus v4.0, Section 1.1Agile Software Development and the Agile Manifesto, the Agile approach is described as:

"Agile software development uses iterative and incremental development, where requirements and solutions evolve through collaboration between self-organizing and cross-functional teams."

Option C reflects this exact concept, highlighting both theiterative-incremental lifecycleand thecollaborative natureof Agile teams.

Option A refers specifically topair programming, a practice used inExtreme Programming (XP), but it’s not a definition of Agile as a whole.

Option B mistakenly describes asequential (Waterfall-like)iteration structure where testing is delayed.

Option D describes ahybrid or phased approach, not consistent with core Agile principles.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

From theCTFL-AT Syllabus v4.0, Section 2.1User Stories and Acceptance Criteria, it states:

"Acceptance criteria are defined collaboratively and refined during the conversation to ensure mutual understanding. They may be added or updated as new insights emerge."

This supportsOption D, which reflects how acceptance criteria evolveduring conversations— a key component of the"Card, Conversation, Confirmation"model.

Option Ais incorrect — the user story istestable, especially with the acceptance criterion.

Option Bis false — the story provides clear user value (printed hard copy for daily records).

Option Cis misleading — the Given-When-Then formatsupportsdiscussions; it doesn’t replace them.