iSQI Related Exams
CTAL-ATT Exam
A developer has implemented a class that calculates if a given date is a leap year. The definition
for the leap year is given:
Every year that is exactly divisible by four is a leap year, except for years that are exactly
divisible by 100, but these centurial years are leap years if they are exactly divisible by 400.
- divisible by 4
- but not by 100
- years divisible by 400 are leap anyway
You have already thought about it and started with the first test class; the test class looks like
(pseudo JavaScript used here):
// LeapYear.spec.js
describe('Leap year calculator', () => {
it('should consider 1996 as leap', () => {
expect(LeapYear.isLeap(1996)).toBe(true);
});
});
What would now be your next step to proceed as efficient as possible, to validate the correctness
of the class above?
Which statement is correct regarding the use of exploratory testing for safety critical systems?
SELECT ONE OPTION
You have been working as a tester in an Agile team You have found that the user stories are being defined by the team but it is still unclear what will be a successful outcome Even after story elaboration you are still unclear as to what a story should do As a result, you're not really sure what to test or to know when you'll be done with testing This problem is becoming worse as completed stories are showcased but the product owner is unhappy with the results
You've looked into the matter further and the comments from the product owner indicate that features are missing from the stories. The story is functioning correctly within the limited definition of the story but the product owner is expecting more functionality, such as error handling that isn't being defined in the story
What technique should you implement that would help to further define the product owner's expectations and alleviate the issues that are arising during the show cases?