CCBA Exam Dumps : Certification of Capability in Business Analysis (CCBA)

Project scope defines all of the required work to satisfy the requirements of the project, including the deliverables, activities, tasks, and resources needed. Project scope is usually documented in a project scope statement or a project charter. Project scope is different from product scope, which defines the features and functions of the product, service, or result that the project intends to deliver. Requirements envisioning is a technique to create a shared vision of the desired outcome among the stakeholders. Requirements foundation is a term used by some authors to describe the core concepts and principles of business analysis. References:

CCBA Handbook, page 11

[BABOK Guide], page 28

[Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide], page 36

[Business Analysis: The Question and Answer Book], page 23

A plan-driven approach to business analysis is an approach that plans upfront with maximum control of what the expected implementation would be. The waterfall project methodology supports a predictive approach in planning. In this approach, the business analyst defines the requirements at ahigh level and then seeks formal approval from the stakeholders before proceeding to the next phase of the project. This ensures that the scope and objectives of the project are clear and agreed upon by all parties involved. The initial requirements are also known as the business requirements or the scope statement. They provide a broad overview of the problem or opportunity, the desired outcomes, the assumptions, constraints, and risks1.

When it comes to communication in a plan-driven approach, the type of communication that is likely required is formal. Formal communication is communication that follows a predefined structure, format, and protocol. It is usually documented, approved, and distributed through official channels. Formal communication is suitable for a plan-driven approach, as it helps to ensure clarity, consistency, accuracy, and traceability of the information. Formal communication also helps to manage expectations, reduce ambiguity, and avoid conflicts or misunderstandings2.

The other options are not correct types of communication that are likely required in a plan-driven approach:

A. Face-to-face: Face-to-face communication is communication that occurs when the participants are physically present and interact directly with each other. It is usually informal, spontaneous, and dynamic. Face-to-face communication is more suitable for an adaptive or agile approach, as it helps to foster collaboration, feedback, and trust among the stakeholders2.

B. Ad hoc: Ad hoc communication is communication that occurs without any prior planning or preparation. It is usually informal, flexible, and responsive. Ad hoc communication is more suitable for an adaptive or agile approach, as it helps to accommodate changes, uncertainties, and emergent issues2.

C. Chain of command: Chain of command communication is communication that follows the hierarchical structure of the organization. It is usually formal, authoritative, and controlled. Chain of command communication is not a type of communication that is specific to a plan-driven approach, as it can be used in any organizational context. However, it may not be the most effective or efficient way of communicating, as it may create delays, distortions, or barriers in the information flow2. References:

1: How to Choose the Right Business Analysis Approach2, section Waterfall Approach, page 1-2

2: How to create a business analysis communication plan1, section Types of communication, page 2-3

Benchmarking is a technique that involves comparing the performance, practices, or processes of one organization with those of another organization or industry leader. Benchmarking can help identify areas of improvement, best practices, and realistic goals. However, benchmarking also has some disadvantages, such as:

Time consumption: Benchmarking can be a time-consuming process that requires collecting, analyzing, and interpreting large amounts of data from multiple sources. It may also involve visiting other organizations or conducting interviews with their staff. Benchmarking may divert resources and attention from other important tasks or activities.

Requirement of expertise of the person conducting the study: Benchmarking requires a high level of expertise and skill from the person conducting the study. The person must be able to select appropriate benchmarks, measure performance accurately, interpret results correctly, and communicate findings effectively. The person must also be aware of the potential biases, limitations, and challenges of benchmarking, such as data availability, validity, reliability, and comparability.

Inability to produce innovative solutions: Benchmarking can limit the creativity and innovation of the organization by focusing on existing practices and processes of other organizations. Benchmarking may create a tendency to imitate or copy others, rather than to develop original or novel solutions. Benchmarking may also discourage risk-taking or experimentation, as the organization may become complacent or satisfied with matching or exceeding the benchmarks.

Discovery of new approaches, on the other hand, is not a disadvantage of benchmarking, but rather a potential benefit. Benchmarking can help the organization learn from the best practices and experiences of other organizations, and discover new or alternative ways of doing things. Benchmarking can expose the organization to different perspectives, ideas, and methods that can enhance its performance and competitiveness. References: Capability in Business Analysis™ (CCBA®) Certification, Business Analysis Driving Business Success, A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge® (BABOK® Guide)