Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Exam Dumps : Better Business Cases Practitioner Exam

To increase the utilization of teachers from 75% to 90% within three years.

To reduce travel times for staff and students to and from the new campus.

To absorb up to 30% growth in the number of 16 to 18-year-old learners within the current establishment of support staff.

To create a healthy competition between learning providers to benefit learners.

Amend entry 1, because all projects should use a benefits register to identify key benefits and how they will be tracked.

Amend entry 1, because the benefits realization strategy for the project should outline how the programme's approach to realizing benefits is being adapted for the project.

Amend entry 2, because the potential benefits from the project should be documented only in the Economic Case.

No change to entry 2, because when a project is part of a wider programme, benefits should be tracked only at the programme level.

No change to entry 2, because tracking benefits at the programme level will help to avoid double counting of benefits from different projects.

There will be a funding gap in Year 2 when the Expenditure is forecast to exceed the Income.

The affordability of the scheme is NOT dependent upon the income from the sale of Pittville High School.

Income from the hire of the sports facilities should NOT be shown as a separate source of income.

Funding to help pay for the construction of the new campus should be shown as a separate source of income in the Revenue Budget.

Local Education Authority (LEA) Funding should be moved to the Economic Appraisal.