APMG-International AgilePM-Foundation Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

In Agile Project Management (AgilePM/DSDM), the control philosophy recognizes that you cannot fix time, cost, quality, and features simultaneously. Governance is achieved by fixing time and cost (and protecting quality through standards and the Definition of Done) while flexing scope using MoSCoW prioritization. This ensures predictability of delivery cadence and budget, while allowing the team to vary the amount of functionality delivered to meet the agreed constraints. Hence, some contingency must exist in at least one of the four variables—most commonly features—so that the project can respond to emerging information without compromising delivery dates or overspending. The AgilePM Handbook explicitly states: “It is unrealistic to expect all four… can be fixed and controlled… allow flexibility in at least one.” This approach enables incremental delivery, continuous negotiation of scope, and controlled change, ensuring that value is maximized within the agreed time and cost boundaries while maintaining quality. Therefore, the correct completion is “at least one of these variables.”

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (paraphrased from Agile Project Management guidance):

Agile leadership distributes authority and nurtures autonomy so that decisions can be made closest to the work. The principle that most clearly embodies empowerment, shared ownership, and accountability at every level is “Leadership lives everywhere in the organization.” This principle encourages leaders to create the conditions for others to lead—clarifying intent, aligning on outcomes, and then trusting teams to own decisions within clear boundaries. It contrasts with command-and-control models by fostering psychological safety, inviting initiative, and rewarding collaborative problem-solving. While feedback (B), meaning and purpose (C), and healthy engagement with emotion (D) are all important, they are supporting principles. The scenario described—empowering others and spreading accountability—maps directly to leadership as a shared organizational capability, not a title. This accelerates learning, reduces decision latency, and enables adaptive responses to change—hallmarks of agile organizations.

AgilePM’s lifecycle comprises Pre-Project, Feasibility, Foundations, Evolutionary Development (Development), Deployment, and Post-Project. Deployment is executed in the Deployment phase, but AgilePM expects deployment planning to be identified early and progressively elaborated as part of ongoing planning during Evolutionary Development. As timeboxes deliver verified increments, the team refines release content, readiness activities, and transition tasks (training, data migration, cutover, support). Embedding deployment activities into the plans during Development ensures that release preparation progresses continuously—not as a late-stage bolt-on—supporting predictable cadence and benefits enablement. While Foundations establishes the initial approach and high-level plans, the detailed, actionable deployment tasks and their scheduling are added and maintained within the Development phase planning cycles so the upcoming Deployment phase can execute smoothly. Hence, from the options provided, the correct choice is Development phase.