APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

For the XAN Insurance Company Web Project, the Development Approach Definition document should outline the methodologies, tools, and techniques to be used during the development process of the project. It focuses on how the project will be executed in terms of technical and management practices.

Selected Statements for the Development Approach Definition:

C. An easy to use web development tool called ' WebMatrix ' is to be used to develop and maintain the website extension.

E. Accessibility and performance of the new online quotation area is to be tested using a tool called Sitebeam.

C. This statement directly specifies a tool (WebMatrix) that will be used for web development and maintenance in the project. It is a clear choice regarding the technical approach and infrastructure, making it suitable for inclusion in the Development Approach Definition.

E. Mentioning Sitebeam as a tool for testing accessibility and performance outlines specific methods for ensuring quality and usability in the development process. It provides actionable information on how testing will be conducted, fitting the criteria for the Development Approach Definition.

Why Other Statements Are Excluded:

A. Introducing an awards or bonus scheme to create competition among sales assistants pertains more to internal sales team management and motivation strategies rather than the technical or methodological approach to developing the project.

B. Comparing traditional telephone sales with online sales is related to the project ' s performance measurement and post-implementation review, not the development approach or methodology used during the project.

D. The request from the Finance Director for a detailed cost report is related to project financial management and monitoring. While important, it does not detail the technical or methodological approach to developing the project ' s deliverables.

B does not align with AgilePM’s MoSCoW prioritization.

In AgilePM, Must Have requirements are the ones that are absolutely essential. If a Must Have is missing, the solution is not viable because it may be unusable, unsafe, non-compliant, or fail to deliver its core purpose.

A Should Have requirement is important, but it is not mandatory for the increment to be considered successful . It adds significant value, and the team aims to deliver it if reasonably possible, but the solution can still be successful without every Should Have being included.

Why the other options align:

A is correct because it accurately describes a Must Have.

C is correct because Could Haves are desirable but only delivered if time and capacity permit.

D is correct because Won’t Have this time items are deliberately excluded from the current increment and may be revisited later.

AgilePM perspective:

MoSCoW is used to protect delivery confidence and business clarity. It helps teams and stakeholders distinguish between:

what is essential,

what is important,

what is desirable,

and what is deferred.

The error in B is that it treats Should Have as if it were equivalent to Must Have , which is not how AgilePM defines the category.

So the correct answer is B .

The correct answer is A .

If the Developers have estimated work using Planning Poker and story points , the right next step is to use a planning approach that helps Hira understand how much work the teams can realistically complete in a Sprint. This supports forecasting the likely number of Sprints required.

Why A is correct:

It keeps estimation in the same agile framework.

It uses the team’s practical delivery capability to forecast Sprint outcomes.

It avoids false precision while still giving Hira a useful basis for planning.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B is incorrect because converting story points directly into person-days undermines the purpose of relative estimation and can create misleading precision.

C is incorrect because assigning average time allocations to every item is too mechanical and not how AgilePM typically uses story-point-based estimation.

D is incorrect because Planning Poker is already an appropriate technique. There is no need to discard it simply because Hira needs a forecast.

So the best answer is A .