Analytics-Admn-201 Exam Dumps : Salesforce Certified Tableau Server Administrator

Tableau Server uses a role-based licensing model with three primary license levels: Creator, Explorer, and Viewer. Each license level corresponds to specific site roles that define what users can do on the server.

Viewer License: This is the most restrictive license, allowing users to view and interact with published content (e.g., dashboards and visualizations) but not to create or publish new content.

Site Role: The Viewer license can only be associated with the Viewer site role. This role restricts users to viewing capabilities, aligning with the license’s purpose.

Option A (Creator): Incorrect. The Creator license is for users who can create, edit, and publish content using Tableau Desktop and the web interface. It corresponds to the Creator site role, not Viewer.

Option B (Explorer (can publish)): Incorrect. This is a variation of the Explorer license, which allows users to edit and publish content within limits. It’s more permissive than Viewer.

Option C (Viewer): Correct. The Viewer site role matches the Viewer license level perfectly.

Option D (Explorer): Incorrect. The Explorer license allows users to explore data and create content in the web interface, exceeding the Viewer license’s capabilities.

Comments on visualizations foster collaboration in Tableau Server—let’s break down the requirements:

Commenting Prerequisites:

Site-Level Enablement: Comments must be activated for the site.

Permission: Users need the "Add Comment" capability on the content.

Site Role: Minimum role of Viewer allows commenting if permissions are set.

Option B (Add Comments must be allowed in permissions): Correct.

Details: In the Permissions dialog (e.g., for a workbook), set "Add Comment" to "Allowed" for users/groups. Default is "Denied" unless explicitly enabled.

How: Content > Workbooks > Actions > Permissions > Edit Rule.

Why: Permissions are granular—site enablement alone isn’t enough.

Option D (Comments must be enabled on the site Settings page): Correct.

Details: Go to Site > Settings > General > Allow Comments—check the box.

Why: This is a site-wide toggle (default: off). Without it, no one can comment, regardless of permissions.

Option A (Minimum site role of Explorer - can publish): Incorrect.

Why: Viewer role suffices if permissions allow—Explorer (can publish) isn’t required (it adds publishing, not commenting).

Option C (Server Settings page): Incorrect.

Why: Comments are a site-level feature, not server-wide—no such toggle exists in TSM’s Server Settings.

Why This Matters: Enabling comments at both site and content levels ensures controlled collaboration—key for team insights.

Abandoned workbooks—those no longer actively used—can clutter Tableau Server and consume resources (e.g., disk space for extracts). Identifying them efficiently requires leveraging built-in administrative tools rather than manual or destructive methods. Let’s explore this in depth:

Tableau Server Admin Views: Tableau provides pre-built administrative views to monitor server health, usage, and content. The Stale Content view, accessible under Server > Status > Administrative Views, is specifically designed to identify content (workbooks, data sources) that hasn’t been viewed or modified recently. It shows:

Content name, owner, and project.

Last viewed date and last modified date.

View count over a period.This view uses Repository data to track usage metrics, making it ideal for spotting abandoned workbooks.

Option A (Use the Stale Content administrative view): Correct. This is the most efficient and non-invasive method. You can filter by last viewed date (e.g., >30 days ago) to identify workbooks with large extracts that users have stopped accessing. From there, you can contact owners or delete the content if policy allows. It’s a server administrator’s go-to tool for content management.

Option B (Examine extract files in ProgramData/.../extract): Incorrect and impractical. The ProgramData/Tableau/Tableau Server/data/tabsvc/dataengine/extract directory stores .hyper extract files, but:

File names are cryptic (e.g., GUIDs), not tied directly to workbook names.

It doesn’t indicate usage or abandonment—only file presence and size.

Manual inspection is time-consuming and error-prone compared to the Stale Content view.

Option C (Delete all extracts and allow them to be re-generated): Incorrect and risky. Deleting extracts (e.g., via tsm maintenance cleanup) removes them without identifying usage. Regeneration only occurs if a schedule or user triggers it, potentially disrupting active users and losing historical data unnecessarily.

Option D (View all workbooks, and sort by the Modified date): Partially effective but inefficient. In the Tableau Server UI (e.g., under Content > Workbooks), you can sort by "Last Modified," but:

It doesn’t show viewership (a workbook might be modified recently but unused).

It’s manual and doesn’t scale for large deployments compared to the Stale Content view.

Why This Matters: The Stale Content view leverages Tableau’s metadata to provide actionable insights, saving time and reducing risk compared to manual or destructive alternatives. It’s part of Tableau’s governance toolkit.