MuleSoft MCIA-Level-1 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Explanation

● Option A says "Perform EACH DB insert in a SEPARATE DB transaction". In this case if first DB insert is successful and second one fails then first insert won't be rolled back causing inconsistency. This option is ruled out.

● Option D says Perform BOTH DB inserts in ONE DB transaction.

Rule of thumb is when one or more DB connections are required we must use XA transaction as local transactions support only one resource. So this option is also ruled out.

● Option B acknowledges the before DB processing, so message is removed from the queue. In case of system failure at later point, message can't be retrieved.

● Option C is Valid: Though it says "do not ack JMS message", message will be auto acknowledged at the end of transaction. Here is how we can ensure all components are part of XA transaction:

Additional Information about transactions:

● XA Transactions - You can use an XA transaction to group together a series of operations from multiple transactional resources, such as JMS, VM or JDBC resources, into a single, very reliable, global transaction.

● The XA (eXtended Architecture) standard is an X/Open group standard which specifies the interface between a global transaction manager and local transactional resource managers.

The XA protocol defines a 2-phase commit protocol which can be used to more reliably coordinate and sequence a series of "all or nothing" operations across multiple servers, even servers of different types

● Use JMS ack if

– Acknowledgment should occur eventually, perhaps asynchronously

– The performance of the message receipt is paramount

– The message processing is idempotent

– For the choreography portion of the SAGA pattern

● Use JMS transactions

– For all other times in the integration you want to perform an atomic unit of work

– When the unit of work comprises more than the receipt of a single message

– To simply and unify the programming model (begin/commit/rollback)

Explanation

* "Create a Mule domain project that maintains the credentials as Mule domain-shared resources" is wrong as domain project is not supported in Cloudhub * We should Avoid Creating duplicates in each Mule application but below two options cause duplication of credentials - Store the credentials in properties files in a shared folder within the organization’s data center. Have the Mule applications load properties files from this shared location at startup - Segregate the credentials for each backend system into environment-specific properties files. Package these properties files in each Mule application, from where they are loaded at startup So these are also wrong choices * Credentials service is the best approach in this scenario. Mule domain projects are not supported on CloudHub. Also its is not recommended to have multiple copies of configuration values as this makes difficult to maintain Use the Mule Credentials Vault to encrypt data in a .properties file. (In the context of this document, we refer to the .properties file simply as the properties file.) The properties file in Mule stores data as key-value pairs which may contain information such as usernames, first and last names, and credit card numbers. A Mule application may access this data as it processes messages, for example, to acquire login credentials for an external Web service. However, though this sensitive, private data must be stored in a properties file for Mule to access, it must also be protected against unauthorized – and potentially malicious – use by anyone with access to the Mule application

According to MuleSoft's IT delivery and operating model, one effective approach to reduce the frequency of IT project delivery failures is to decouple central IT projects from the innovation that happens within each line of business. This approach allows individual business units to innovate and develop solutions tailored to their specific needs while the central IT team focuses on providing core services and governance. By decentralizing innovation, organizations can increase agility, reduce bottlenecks, and foster a more responsive IT environment that can quickly adapt to changing business requirements.

References

• MuleSoft IT Operating Model Guidelines
• Anypoint Platform Documentation on Decoupling IT Projects