Microsoft AZ-104 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

To meet the technical requirement that User1 can create initiative definitions and User4 can assign initiatives to RG2, we must understand how Azure Policy roles operate according to Microsoft Azure documentation and AZ-104 study guides.

Azure Policy uses role-based access control (RBAC) to determine who can create, manage, and assign policies or initiatives (policy sets). The key roles relevant to this task are:

Resource Policy Contributor – Allows users to create, edit, and delete policy definitions and initiative definitions, but does not allow assignment of policies or initiatives. This role is required for users who will design or build the policy logic (definitions).

Therefore, User1, who needs to create initiative definitions, must have the Resource Policy Contributor role.

Scope: Subscription (Sub1) – because initiatives are created at subscription or management group level.

Contributor – Provides full access to manage resources, except granting permissions. Contributors can assign existing policies or initiatives to resource groups or subscriptions if they have sufficient permissions.

Therefore, User4, who needs to assign initiatives to RG2, must be assigned the Contributor role at the RG2 scope.

Other roles:

Security Admin is related to Microsoft Defender for Cloud security settings, not policy creation.

Resource Policy Contributor for RG2 would not meet the requirement because creating definitions typically requires subscription-level access.

According to Microsoft Docs (“Azure built-in roles for Policy”):

“The Resource Policy Contributor role allows users to create, edit, and delete Azure policy and initiative definitions. To assign policies or initiatives, users need the Contributor or Owner role at the appropriate scope.”

Hence, the configuration should be:

User1: Resource Policy Contributor for Sub1

User4: Contributor for RG2

In the scenario, storage1 is configured as StorageV2 with Hierarchical namespace = Yes, while storage2 is configured as StorageV2 with Hierarchical namespace = No.

From Microsoft’s Azure Storage Documentation and AZ-104 Study Guide, the following principles apply:

A hierarchical namespace (enabled when the storage account has Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 capabilities) allows the use of directories within containers to organize data.

The hierarchical namespace provides directory and file-level structure similar to a file system. This is supported only for blob containers, not for Azure Files.

Azure Files (file shares) do not depend on hierarchical namespaces and cannot have directories in the same way Data Lake Gen2 does — directories can exist inside the share but not in the blob container sense.

The planned change states that you must use directories whenever possible to organize content. Therefore, only storage accounts with hierarchical namespace enabled can use directory structures — that’s storage1.

In this case:

storage1 (Hierarchical namespace = Yes) → supports containers (like cont1) and file shares (like share1).

storage2 (Hierarchical namespace = No) → does not support directories within blob containers (Data Lake structure).

Hence, you can use only cont1 (container in storage1) and share1 (file share in storage1) to organize content as required.

This is directly supported by the Microsoft documentation on Data Lake Storage Gen2:

“When you enable the hierarchical namespace for a storage account, you can organize objects into directories and subdirectories. This capability is available only for accounts configured for Data Lake Storage Gen2.”

Final Verified Answer: ✅ B. cont1 and share1 only