Free and Premium Confluent CCAAK Dumps Questions Answers

Each Kafka partition is associated with log files and index files that are opened and maintained by the broker. Increasing the number of partitions increases the number of file descriptors (open files). Therefore, it is critical to verify that the broker's system-level max open file count (ulimit -n) is sufficiently high.

From Kafka documentation:

“Each partition uses multiple open files. When the number of partitions increases significantly, make sure to increase the max open file descriptors allowed for the Kafka process.”

C → Correct: Prevents file descriptor exhaustion.

A/B/D → Unrelated to partition count scalability.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 6, p. 192

Apache Kafka Documentation: Production Deployment and Scaling Tips

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

When sizing a ksqlDB cluster, the following factors are crucial:

A. Data Schema: Complex schemas may require more CPU/memory for serialization/deserialization.

B. Number of Queries: Each persistent query consumes system resources (CPU, memory).

C. Number of Partitions: Determines parallelism and state store scalability.

From Confluent documentation:

“Cluster capacity planning depends on schema complexity, query concurrency, and partition count.”

D → Incorrect: Encryption impacts producer/broker, not ksqlDB sizing directly.

E → Incorrect: Retention is managed by Kafka, not ksqlDB.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 7, p. 225–229

Confluent ksqlDB Documentation: Capacity Planning Guidelines

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

To support gradual migration to SSL, Kafka supports configuring multiple listeners. You can run both a PLAINTEXT listener (for legacy clients) and an SSL listener (for new clients), allowing dual access.

From Kafka documentation:

“You can configure multiple listeners on a broker with different security protocols. This allows rolling out SSL while supporting legacy connections.”

A → Incorrect: Modifying the current listener breaks current clients.

B → Misleading: Changing advertised listeners affects how clients connect, which breaks backward compatibility.

C → Correct: Dual listeners allow phased SSL migration.

D → SSL must be configured on both ends to be effective.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 10, p. 305

Apache Kafka Documentation: Configuring Multiple Listeners

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Kafka supports quotas to limit the broker resources each client can use. This is used to prevent one client from monopolizing cluster bandwidth.

From Kafka documentation:

“Quotas can be applied to both producers and consumers. These quotas are enforced based on the number of bytes per second, and they are applied to ensure fair usage of broker resources.”

A. Quotas → Correct: Admins can define quotas on throughput per client ID or user.

B. Consumer Groups → Incorrect: This controls parallelism in consumption but not resource fairness.

C. Rebalancing → Incorrect: This helps with load balancing but not with resource limitation.

D. ACLs → Incorrect: ACLs define access permissions but not resource usage.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 10 (“Administering Kafka”), p. 306–308

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Kafka supports multiple listeners, allowing you to configure different security settings for internal and external traffic. For example, one listener can use PLAINTEXT for internal replication traffic, and another can use SASL_SSL for external client traffic.

From Kafka documentation:

“Kafka allows configuration of multiple listeners to segregate internal and external traffic, each with its own security protocol.”

B → Correct: Enables secure and isolated communication channels.

A → Unnecessary and inefficient.

C → Invalid: A single listener supports only one protocol.

D → Not a Kafka-level configuration.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 10, p. 305

Apache Kafka Documentation: Security Configuration – Multiple Listeners

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Kafka consumers in a consumer group consume partitions exclusively. With 4 partitions and only 2 consumers, each consumer is processing 2 partitions. To increase parallelism, more consumers can be added to the group (up to 4) so that each consumer handles fewer partitions, which reduces the lag.

From Kafka documentation:

“Increasing the number of consumers in a group increases parallelism and helps reduce lag, assuming there are enough partitions.”

A → Ineffective unless followed by rebalancing and consumer scaling.

B → Would create a separate group and not share load.

C → Not applicable; consumers don’t acknowledge messages like producers.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 4, p. 127–129

Apache Kafka Documentation: Consumer Group Behavior

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Kafka architecture maintains exactly one active Controller at any given time, regardless of the number of brokers. The Controller is responsible for administrative tasks like partition leader election and topic creation. The remaining brokers are replicas, ready to take over if the Controller fails.

From Kafka documentation:

“At any given time, there is only one active controller in the Kafka cluster.”

Even in a cluster with 4 brokers, only 1 broker acts as the Controller.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 6, p. 189

Apache Kafka Documentation: Controller Role Description

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

The kafka-consumer-groups.sh script is used to monitor consumer group offsets and lag. It shows the current offset, log end offset, and lag for each partition consumed by a consumer group.

From Kafka documentation:

“You can use kafka-consumer-groups.sh with the --describe flag to get the offset lag per consumer group.”

A → Incorrect: No such built-in script.

B → Correct: Official script for viewing consumer group lag.

C → Incorrect: Does not exist as a built-in Kafka tool.

D → Incorrect: Used for partition reassignment, unrelated to lag monitoring.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 10, p. 308

Apache Kafka Documentation: kafka-consumer-groups.sh usage

Replication in Kafka ensures that partition data is copied across multiple brokers. This guarantees durability (data survives broker failure) and availability (other replicas can serve as leader if current leader fails).

From Kafka documentation:

“Replication ensures that data is not lost if a broker crashes and that messages remain available even during broker outages.”

B → Correct: Ensures persisted data even after failure.

C → Correct: Allows partition leader failover.

A → Incorrect: Replication may slightly reduce performance.

D → Incorrect: Replication is not a security mechanism.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 6, p. 189–191

Apache Kafka Documentation: Replication Overview

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

To increase throughput, Kafka recommends allowing larger batches and giving more time for the producer to accumulate records into batches:

batch.size: Increasing this allows more records to be sent in a single request.

linger.ms: Increasing this adds a delay so that the producer can accumulate more messages into a batch.

From Kafka documentation:

“Increasing both batch.size and linger.ms allows the producer to send larger, more efficient batches, improving throughput at the cost of slightly increased latency.”

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 5, p. 162–163

Apache Kafka Documentation: Producer Configuration Parameters

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

In Kafka, the Controller is responsible for managing partition leadership. When a broker that was leader for certain partitions goes down, the Controller immediately detects the failure and:

Triggers a new leader election among the in-sync replicas (ISRs) of those partitions.

Updates the partition metadata to reflect the new leaders and notifies the cluster.

Kafka documentation states:

“When a broker fails, the controller triggers a leader election for all partitions previously led by the failed broker.”

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 6, p. 190–191

Apache Kafka Documentation: “Kafka Controller and Leader Election”

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Upon detecting a broker failure, the Controller performs leader election among in-sync replicas and updates the new leader and ISR information in ZooKeeper. It then broadcasts this metadata update to all brokers in the cluster.

From Kafka documentation:

“The controller writes the new leader and ISR list to ZooKeeper and informs all brokers so they can update their metadata cache.”

B → Correct: New metadata written to ZooKeeper.

C → Correct: Brokers are updated via metadata propagation.

A → Incorrect: The Controller makes the decision, not ZooKeeper.

D → Incorrect: Producers and consumers learn about changes via brokers, not directly.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 6, p. 190–191

Apache Kafka Documentation: Controller Behavior & ZooKeeper Interactions

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Kafka uses ZooKeeper as its distributed coordination system. ZooKeeper helps manage cluster metadata and leader election.

A → Correct: Brokers retrieve leader/partition assignments from ZooKeeper.

D → Correct: ZooKeeper is used to elect the controller broker responsible for cluster-wide administrative tasks.

From Kafka documentation:

“ZooKeeper maintains metadata for Kafka, including broker registration and controller election.”

B → Incorrect: Broker scaling is not handled via ZooKeeper.

C → Incorrect: Replication across clusters is not related to ZooKeeper.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 6, p. 189–191

Apache Kafka Documentation: ZooKeeper Integration

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Kafka uses a pull model for consumers. The consumer polls the broker for available data. This contrasts with push models (used in traditional messaging systems), where the server pushes messages to consumers.

From Kafka documentation:

“Kafka’s consumers use a pull model, where the consumer requests messages from the broker at its own pace.”

A → Incorrect: Kafka does not push messages.

B → Incorrect: Kafka is a publish-subscribe system, but not the model used for message delivery to consumers.

C → Correct: Consumers explicitly pull messages.

D → Invalid in Kafka terminology.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 4, p. 126

Apache Kafka Documentation: Consumer Design Overview

Kafka's Controller is a broker that also performs controller duties. It is not a dedicated node. Therefore, it continues to host topics, partitions, and leaders just like any other broker.

From Kafka documentation:

“The controller is one of the brokers in the cluster and continues to perform all normal broker functions.”

A → Correct: The controller is also a normal broker with partitions.

B/C/D → Incorrect: Replication and consumer fetches are not tied to the controller.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 6, p. 190

Apache Kafka Documentation: Kafka Controller Behavior

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

For maximum throughput and lowest latency, the setting acks=0 allows the producer to send messages without waiting for any acknowledgment from the broker. This increases speed but at the cost of durability.

From Kafka documentation:

“acks=0: The producer does not wait for any acknowledgment from the broker. The message can be lost but offers the highest throughput.”

A → Correct: Maximizes throughput with no delivery guarantee.

B → Balanced option but not max throughput.

C → Offers strongest durability but lowest throughput.

D → Invalid configuration.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 5, p. 158–159

Apache Kafka Documentation: Producer Configs – acks