Salesforce Certified-Strategy-Designer Dumps

Ecosystem Mapping is an appropriate tool for identifying key stakeholders, influencers, and entities that will interact with or be affected by the new loyalty program. This method helps in visualizing the broader context and relationships within the program's ecosystem, aiding in strategic planning and stakeholder management.

The strategy designer should share customer needs and tie them to business goals to build a shared understanding and agreement among business leaders to move forward with the new initiative of creating a new line of sustainable footwear. This helps demonstrate the value and relevance of the initiative, and how it aligns with the business vision and objectives. References:

The commonality between a need statement and a challenge statement is that both are solution free statements, that is, they do not prescribe or imply any specific solution, but rather define the problem or opportunity space. Both are not tactics intended to solve the problem or explain the scope of possible solutions, as they are more focused on framing the problem.

The strategy designer should work through the conflict in the workshop to reach a shared perspective, rather than avoiding or suppressing it. This helps surface different opinions and perspectives, foster constructive dialogue, and align on common goals and criteria. References:

Providing early access to digital collaboration tools and ensuring all participants are comfortable using them before the workshop starts can enhance accessibility and participation. This preparation helps level the playing field, especially for those less experienced with technology, ensuring a productive and inclusive session.

Salesforce Developer Release Notes provide detailed information on upcoming features and updates, including new functionalities that might be relevant to the team's needs. Checking these notes can confirm whether the anticipated feature will be part of a future Salesforce release, aiding in planning and decision-making.

The best recommendation to help the team efficiently share the right data is to create dashboards in Tableau, as this allows them to visualize and analyze data from different sources, customize and filter views, and share insights with different audiences. Developing reports in Sales Cloud or providing Kanban view in Revenue Cloud may not offer the same level of flexibility and functionality as Tableau.

The best thing to do to test a How Might We statement to ensure it successfully guides the design process is to use rapid ideation with the project team, as this helps generate and evaluate multiple ideas that address the design challenge and reveal any gaps or assumptions in the statement. Testing the statement with end users or launching an online survey may not be effective or feasible ways to test a How Might We statement, as they are more suitable for testing solutions or gathering feedback.

The best method to improve feasibility of a concept direction that involves sustainable materials is to run a cost benefit analysis, which is a quantitative way of comparing the costs and benefits of different alternatives and finding the optimal solution. Creating a functional prototype or reviewing and aligning with company V2MOM may not address the feasibility issue directly.

The strategy designer should create a journey map that extends into pre-purchase and post-use disposal to uncover unseen impacts of the product’s lifecycle, to prepare to measure progress toward the goal of improving the sustainability of the business. This helps identify the environmental touchpoints and opportunities for improvement across the entire customer journey, not just during the use phase. References:

The strategy designer should explore diversifying product offerings to increase market share. This means creating new products or services that appeal to different customer segments or needs, and expanding the customer base and revenue potential of the business. References:

The strategy designer should facilitate a workshop on ideating and sketching with the core team members to engage them more. A workshop is a collaborative session where participants work together to generate ideas, solve problems, or make decisions. Ideating and sketching are techniques to stimulate creativity and visualize concepts. By involving the developers in these activities, the strategy designer can help them understand the value of design thinking, foster their ownership of the process, and leverage their skills and perspectives. Conducting interviews may provide some insights on process approaches, but it does not engage them in design work. Inviting them to lead the conversation for synthesis and persona development may put too much pressure on them if they are not familiar with these methods.

The best tactic to understand the potential impacts of stakeholders on a project is stakeholder analysis, which is a systematic way of identifying and assessing the interests, expectations, and influences of various stakeholders. A stakeholder focus group or stakeholder KPIs may not capture the full spectrum of stakeholder perspectives and impacts.

Viability is the criterion that is not being met by the pilot program for drone-delivered footwear. Viability refers to how profitable or sustainable a product or service is, given the market demand and cost structure. It can be measured by comparing the revenue and expenses of the product or service, and assessing the return on investment or break-even point. References:

Validating the market for a new app involves understanding the target audience's willingness to pay. Recruiting target users to test various price points provides direct insights into the app's perceived value and the price range acceptable to potential customers, informing pricing strategy and market viability.

Some safeguards that should be put in place to ensure the research is conducted ethically are a code of conduct, ethics training, and a research data handling policy. A code of conduct is a set of principles and guidelines that define ethical behavior and expectations for researchers and participants. Ethics training is a way to educate researchers on ethical issues and best practices in conducting research. A research data handling policy is a document that specifies how research data will be collected, stored, accessed, shared, analyzed, and disposed of in a secure and compliant manner. A customer journey map, research scenario, and a RAID log are tools for planning and documenting research activities, but they do not address ethical issues. A hypothesis, project plan, and financial reimbursement for users are elements of research design and execution, but they do not ensure ethical conduct.

 The purpose of an Impact & Effort matrix is to prioritize projects based on key goals outlined in project framing. An Impact & Effort matrix is a tool to evaluate and compare projects based on two criteria: the impact they have on achieving the desired outcomes, and the effort they require to implement. Projects that have high impact and low effort are usually prioritized, while projects that have low impact and high effort are usually deprioritized. An Impact & Effort matrix does not compare products based on predefined criteria or classify projects according to their level of urgency.

The Desirable, Feasible, Viable framework is essential for ensuring a new business model's success. It ensures the model is customer-centric (Desirable), technically and organizationally achievable (Feasible), and financially sustainable (Viable), aligning the innovation with customer needs, operational capabilities, and business objectives.

The best roadmap to communicate the planned releases of multiple products in a single view is a portfolio roadmap, as this helps show how different products align with the strategic goals and initiatives of the organization, and how they interrelate and depend on each other. A strategy roadmap or a product roadmap may not be able to capture the complexity and diversity of multiple products.

The reason why marker choice is important is that they enable stakeholders to focus on generating ideas rather than detailing UI. Fat markers are thick pens that limit the level of detail that can be drawn on a sticky note. They help stakeholders concentrate on the concept or idea behind the sketch, rather than the user interface or visual design. References:

To gain the developer's support, crafting a compelling narrative that resonates with their values and concerns is effective. This approach involves presenting the concept in a way that aligns with the developer's interests and technical perspective, facilitating understanding and buy-in.

The best approach in terms of bringing skills and talent for a project with budget constraints and unclear variables and decisions is to bring in team members with strong problem solving skills, as this helps tackle ambiguity and uncertainty, and generate creative and effective solutions. Defining additional leads for each functional area or staffing heavily from the development phase may not be feasible or optimal for the project.

Mapping out accessibility standards in terms of their impact on users and implementation difficulty provides a clear, strategic view of why meeting these standards is essential. This approach helps in prioritizing accessibility efforts based on their potential to enhance user experience and inclusivity, while also considering the practical aspects of integrating these standards into product development.

Interviewing 8-10 customers about how banking fits into their lives and their ideal relationship with their bank is the best way to learn about the unique expectations of the company’s customers. This method provides qualitative and contextual insights into the customers’ needs, goals, pain points, and emotions. References:

The best tool to identify the root causes, dependencies, and opportunities for improvement in a situation where items that are advertised sell out too quickly is stakeholder interviews, as this helps gather insights and feedback from different perspectives and roles involved in the marketing and fulfillment processes. A service blueprint or a journey map may not be able to diagnose the problem without first understanding the stakeholder needs and expectations.

A priority matrix is a method that helps stakeholders decide which ideas to build by evaluating them based on two criteria, such as impact and feasibility. It helps prioritize the most valuable and viable solutions and eliminate the ones that are not worth pursuing. References:

A Priority Matrix is a tool used in decision-making to help stakeholders prioritize tasks or ideas based on their urgency and importance. For Cloud Kicks, facing a challenge with customer dissatisfaction due to long waiting periods, a Priority Matrix will help the team to visually plot the ideas based on their potential impact on solving the issue and the effort required to implement them. This method allows for a structured comparison of ideas, making it easier to decide which ones to build on.

CK should continuously align business goals to the vision to maintain the vision and create transformative change. Business goals are the specific and measurable objectives that support the vision. By aligning business goals to the vision, CK can ensure that every decision and action is consistent with the desired future state, and that the vision is not diluted or distorted over time. Aligning the vision to current industry trends may not be relevant or sustainable for CK’s unique value proposition. Realizing that the vision must be driven by business goals may undermine the purpose and direction of the vision.

 The project team should spend time affinity mapping, spotting patterns, and surfacing surprises, to identify key insights after conducting user research. This method involves grouping data points into themes or categories, finding connections or trends among them, and highlighting unexpected or surprising findings. References:

The technique that should be used to frame the design challenge on the right problems is to construct “How might we…” questions. “How might we…” questions are a way to reframe problems into opportunities for innovation. They are open-ended, optimistic, and user-centered, and they help define the scope and direction of the design project. Designing “For an optimal experience…” questions or creating “As a user, I should…” questions may not be effective for framing the design challenge, as they may imply or limit potential solutions.

Involving the customer in the presentation can demonstrate internal support and shared commitment to the project, helping to alleviate the lead's concerns. This collaboration can foster trust in the design thinking process and the project's potential impact, facilitating approval.

The key business criteria that should be ensured for launching a campaign that rewards customer behavior by giving away free merchandise is viability. Viability is the degree to which a product or service is profitable and sustainable for the business. By giving away free merchandise, Cloud Kicks should ensure that the campaign is viable in terms of costs, revenues, risks, and benefits. Desirability or feasibility may not be the key criteria for this campaign, as they relate to the customer or technical aspects of the product or service.

V2MOM stands for Vision, Values, Methods, Obstacles, and Measures. It is a tool that helps align teams around common goals and objectives, and track progress and results. It is used by Salesforce to bring plans to reality after workshops and ideation sessions. References:

V2MOM is an acronym that stands for Vision, Values, Methods, Obstacles, and Measures. It is a tool used by Salesforce and recommended in their strategy design processes to align teams and bring strategic plans to fruition. After a workshop where a strategy designer and UX team develop a plan around the team's purpose and organizational alignment, using V2MOM helps to articulate the Vision of what they want to achieve, the Values that are most important to them, the Methods they will use to get there, the Obstacles they anticipate, and the Measures they will use to know whether they are successful. This framework ensures clarity and alignment, making it the ideal document to transition from planning to execution.

The best way to gain alignment from a key decision maker who is neutral or detracting from a project is to set up a conversation with them to name the challenge and listen to their objections, as this shows respect and empathy and allows for mutual understanding and feedback. Asking the sponsor to speak to them on behalf of the project or emailing them reiterating project status may not address their concerns or motivations effectively.

The consideration that CK should make when delivering this solution is that accessibility needs to be integrated throughout the entire project lifecycle. Accessibility refers to the design and development of products or services that are usable by everyone, regardless of their abilities or disabilities. Accessibility needs to be considered and incorporated from the beginning to the end of the project, not as an afterthought or a separate process. This helps ensure that the solution meets the standards and guidelines for accessibility, and provides a positive and inclusive experience for all users. References:

The success of a self-service solution should be measured by the decreased number of customer cases, as this indicates that customers are able to find the information they need without contacting support. The number of Knowledge articles or the bounce rate on document pages may not reflect the effectiveness or satisfaction of the self-service solution.

Journey mapping is the most effective co-design workshop method for helping service agents understand the customer support experience comprehensively. It visually represents the customer's end-to-end journey, highlighting pain points, opportunities for improvement, and areas causing disjointed experiences, fostering a shared understanding among agents.

One way to increase the team’s psychological safety to encourage productive collaboration is to ask everyone to share a personal experience, as this helps build trust, empathy, and rapport among team members. Asking everyone their expected level of project involvement or introducing themselves via title and greatest success may not foster psychological safety, as they may create hierarchy, pressure, or competition.

The key reason why the design team would engage the developer team is to validate technical limitations. Technical limitations are constraints or challenges that affect the feasibility or viability of a solution, such as platform capabilities, integrations, performance, security, or scalability. The design team should consult with the developer team to understand and address these limitations, and ensure that the solution is realistic and achievable. References:

Subjective feedback often occurs when the parameters of a critique are not clearly established. Providing clear guidelines helps participants understand the context, objectives, and specific areas where feedback is needed, focusing the discussion on constructive and objective observations rather than personal preferences.

Dot voting is a democratic and quick way to gauge group consensus on the most valued ideas. It narrows down numerous ideas to those most critical to the group, facilitating focused discussions on priorities and driving alignment on strategic opportunities.

The best way to build and rationalize a case with a new team on sustainability goals is to analyze internal systems through the lens of environmental risk, as this helps identify opportunities and challenges for improvement and aligns with the corporate value of sustainability. Meeting with the team and giving them feasible solutions or presenting research on climate change may not be persuasive or relevant enough for the team.

This option reflects the format of the design challenge statement. A design challenge statement is a statement that frames the problem to be solved in a human-centered and open-ended way. It typically follows the format of “How might we (HMW) + user + need + outcome”. It helps inspire and guide the ideation and solution generation process. References:

Engaging in a journey mapping workshop provides value by offering a holistic view of user interactions and experiences. For a Salesforce Architect, this understanding can inform the creation of a solution architecture diagram that aligns technical capabilities with user needs and journeys. The insights gained from the journey map ensure that technical solutions are user-centric and support the desired outcomes.

Creating Jobs To Be Done is part of the define phase of the design thinking process. This phase involves synthesizing the insights from the empathize phase and framing the problem statement in a human-centered way. Jobs To Be Done are statements that describe what customers are trying to achieve or accomplish through a product or service. References:

The value proposition is the part of the business model canvas that represents desirability. It describes the value that the product or service offers to the customer segments, and how it solves their problems or satisfies their needs. References: