PEGACPRSA22V1 Questions Bank

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

When building robotic automations intended for integration with Pega Platform (through Robotic Desktop Automation (RDA) or Robotic Process Automation (RPA)), Pega Systems outlines a set of best practices to ensure reliable execution, data consistency, and seamless communication between the automation and Pega case workflows.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, in the section “Developing Robot Activities for Pega Integration”, the following recommendations are provided:

“When developing automations intended for execution by Pega applications, adhere to the following guidelines:

Always return a valid completion status from the automation to indicate success or failure to the calling Pega activity.

Ensure that the data exchanged between Pega Platform and the automation matches in both type and format to prevent runtime errors or data transformation issues.

The activity name in Pega Platform (as specified in the robotic automation name field) must exactly match the name defined in the Robot Activity component in Robot Studio to establish a valid invocation link.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Set valid completion status.

Correct. Each automation that is invoked from Pega must return a valid completion status (e.g., Success, Fail, Completed, Error). This status is sent back through the Robot Activity response data transform.

This ensures that the Pega case or data page correctly interprets the automation’s result and can take subsequent actions (e.g., proceed, retry, or raise an exception).

D. Ensure data formats agree between the automation and the Pega application.

Correct. The data types and structure between Pega and the robotic automation must align (for example, string-to-string, integer-to-integer, JSON format consistency).

Mismatched or unstructured data results in serialization errors when passing data through the RDA bridge.

E. Match the Pega automation identifier with the robot activity component name.

Correct. The Robotic Automation Name specified in the Pega data page or case configuration (e.g., FETCH_SCORE) must exactly match the ActivityName property defined in the Robot Studio’s Robot Activity component.

This linkage ensures that the correct automation is triggered when the case executes the RDA call.

Incorrect Options:

B. Design an automation to complete multiple tasks.

Not recommended. Pega advises building modular automations, where each automation performs a single defined task to simplify debugging and improve reuse.

C. Use an unlimited number of transferable data items.

Not recommended. The number of data items passed between Pega and Robotics should be limited to those necessary for the task, as excessive data transfers can degrade performance.

F. Run automations synchronously.

Not required. RDA automations typically run asynchronously, returning results through callback mechanisms to avoid blocking the user interface.

Therefore, the three recommended developer considerations are:

A. Set valid completion status

D. Ensure data formats agree between the automation and the Pega application

E. Match the Pega automation identifier with the robot activity component name

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega Robot Studio, the StartMethod and Path properties determine how an adapter attaches to or launches a target application. When interrogating applications, these configurations must be correctly defined for Robot Studio to recognize and interact with the application’s user interface elements.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, in the section “Application Adapter Properties and Interrogation Settings”, it states:

“The StartMethod property defines how Pega Robot Studio connects to or starts an application.

When using the ‘MonitorAll’ method, Robot Studio does not start the application automatically; instead, it waits for an existing instance of the application to be detected at runtime.

If the ‘Path’ property is undefined when using MonitorAll, the adapter has no reference to locate or attach to the running process, preventing interrogation of controls.”

Detailed Reasoning:

The MonitorAll StartMethod is typically used to attach to an already running application rather than launching a new instance.

For this to function correctly, Robot Studio needs to know which process to monitor, and that is determined by the Path property (the executable location of the target application).

If the Path property is missing or left undefined, Robot Studio cannot identify which process to monitor, even though the application may appear to launch.

As a result, the bullseye tool will not function because no valid application handle is established for interrogation.

Option Analysis:

A. Incorrect — StartAndWait requires both the executable and window parameters, but the symptom here points specifically to an undefined Path under MonitorAll.

B. Incorrect — StartOnProject determines whether the app launches with the project, not whether it can be interrogated.

C. Incorrect — Start with undefined TargetPath would prevent the app from launching, but the question states the app does load.

D. Correct — Using MonitorAll without a defined Path prevents Robot Studio from attaching to the process, disabling interrogation.

Therefore, the correct answer is D — the StartMethod on the application is set to MonitorAll, but the Path property is undefined.