Newly Released SAVE International CVS Exam PDF

The correct answer is D. Align focus . In Function Analysis, the team defines what the subject must do, not what its parts are. SAVE’s study guidance states that functions are described using two-word active verb/measurable noun pairings, and FAST is used to show how project functions relate to each other. ( )

For prescription eyeglasses, the basic function is correct vision . On the Function Logic Path, the “how” question asks: How do eyeglasses correct vision? The best functional answer is align focus because prescription lenses bend and direct light so the image focuses correctly for the user. This directly supports the basic function.

The other choices are supporting or secondary functions. Secure position helps hold the glasses properly on the face, but it does not itself correct vision. Minimize weight improves comfort, and improve durability supports dependability, but neither explains the direct functional mechanism of vision correction. FAST logic is specifically used to map these function relationships through How/Why reasoning, making align focus the correct lower-order function linked to “correct vision.” ( )

References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; FAST Diagramming; Function Logic Path; Basic Function; Lower-Order Function.

The correct answers are A. Presentation environment and location and C. The technical experience of the audience . In the Presentation Phase, the facilitator must shape the format so the VM results can be clearly understood by decision-makers and stakeholders. SAVE’s Value Methodology Standard states that the team leader develops a report and/or presentation that documents and conveys the adequacy of the developed alternatives and their associated value improvement opportunity. ( )

The presentation environment and location matter because format choices depend on whether the presentation is in-person, virtual, formal, informal, executive-level, workshop-style, or held in a room with limited display or discussion capability. The facilitator must ensure the setting supports clear communication, graphics, interaction, and decision-making.

The technical experience of the audience is also essential. Highly technical reviewers may need detailed assumptions, calculations, drawings, and risk explanations. Senior executives may need a concise value case, cost impact, implementation effect, and decision options.

Option B concerns presenter assignment, not presentation format. Option D is too narrow; PowerPoint is only one possible delivery tool and does not define the proper VM presentation format.

References/topics: Presentation Phase; VM Report and Presentation; Audience Analysis; Presentation Environment; Decision-Maker Communication.

The correct answer is D. Identify how to modify behaviors in the context of the new situation . This question is testing the facilitator’s understanding of resistance to change during VM implementation or decision acceptance. When decision makers cling to familiar methods and reject all VM proposals, the problem is not necessarily the technical quality of the proposals. It is usually behavioral resistance caused by uncertainty, loss of comfort, perceived risk, or attachment to existing practices.

A VM facilitator should not simply repeat the study or replace the team. The facilitator should help decision makers understand how the recommended change can be adopted in practical terms. This includes showing what behaviors, processes, responsibilities, and decision patterns need to change under the new situation.

Option A is incorrect because identifying instability may increase concern rather than reduce resistance. Option B is inefficient and does not address the root cause. Option C is also weak because withholding information can reduce trust. The better VM facilitation strategy is to guide decision makers through the behavioral transition required for successful acceptance.

References/topics: VM Facilitation and Team Dynamics; Change Management; Resistance to Change; Decision-Maker Acceptance; Implementation Phase.

The correct answer is D. Recognition of VM study contributors . The Presentation Phase is intended to communicate the developed VM recommendations to decision makers in a way that supports approval, concurrence, and movement toward implementation. SAVE’s Value Methodology Standard states that the team leader develops a report and/or presentation that documents the adequacy of the developed alternatives and the associated value improvement opportunity.

Therefore, recommended proposals are central to the presentation. The VM study scope and goals are also appropriate because decision makers need to understand the boundaries, objectives, assumptions, and basis of the study. Expected implementation decisions are also relevant because the presentation should help management determine whether alternatives should proceed, require more information, or be rejected. The Presentation Phase is specifically tied to obtaining concurrence and commitment to proceed with implementation recommendations.

Recognition of contributors may be professionally courteous and can appear in a report appendix, closing remarks, or acknowledgments section, but it is not essential technical content for decision making. Compared with scope, goals, recommendations, and implementation decisions, it is the least appropriate core information for the VM presentation.

References/topics: Presentation Phase; VM Report; Recommended Proposals; Implementation Commitment; Decision-Maker Communication.