Newly Released PECB ISO-45001-Lead-Auditor Exam PDF

Conducting the interview virtually is the most appropriate response because it preserves the planned audit activity, enables the General Manager to provide the required evidence and avoids unnecessary disruption to the surveillance audit. Remote audit methods are legitimate when the required information can be accessed effectively and confidentiality, connectivity and other audit risks are appropriately managed. Replacing the General Manager with other managers could prevent the auditor from obtaining evidence specifically associated with that person ' s leadership responsibilities. Delaying only that interview until the following week would leave the current audit incomplete, while postponing the entire audit is disproportionate when a practical remote method is available. ISO guidance expressly recognizes physical and virtual audit locations, and ISO/IEC TS 17012 provides dedicated guidance for remote methods in first-, second- and third-party management-system audits.

ISO 45001 emphasizes worker participation and engagement at all levels of the organization to support continuous improvement (Clause 5.4 and Clause 10.3). Continuous improvement requires input from everyone, including workers who identify hazards, report incidents, and contribute to safety enhancements.

Analysis of Options:

A. Everyone, at all levels of the company:Correct. Clause 5.4 explicitly includes all levels of the organization in consultation and participation, fostering continuous improvement.

B. Top management and senior officers only:Incorrect. While top management plays a crucial role in leadership, ISO 45001 extends the responsibility for participation to all levels.

C. Top management, senior officers, and designated safety representatives only:Incorrect. Limiting participation to designated representatives excludes a significant portion of the workforce from the improvement process.

D. Top management only:Incorrect. While top management must lead and commit to continuous improvement, their involvement alone is insufficient under ISO 45001.

ISO References:

Clause 5.4: Worker consultation and participation.

Clause 10.3: Continual improvement.

The correct answers are E, F.

ISO 45001 Clause 8.1.4.2 Contractors requires the organization to coordinate its procurement processes with its contractors, in order to identify hazards and to assess and control the OH and S risks arising from the contractors’ activities and operations that impact the organization, the organization’s activities and operations that impact the contractors’ workers, and the contractors’ activities and operations that impact other interested parties in the workplace. It also requires the organization to ensure that contractors and their workers meet the organization’s OH and S management system requirements.

In this case, the objective evidence already found during the audit supports the nonconformity:

the hazards list did not include contractor-related hazards;

the Purchase Manager relied on trust rather than controlled OH and S coordination;

the OH and S team said chemical safety had never been a problem, which is not evidence of hazard identification, risk assessment, or control.

The email shown at the closing meeting only states that contractors carry out a site risk assessment. That does not automatically demonstrate that Shelf-Fit itself has met Clause 8.1.4.2 requirements for coordinated procurement control, hazard identification, and control of contractor OH and S risks within its own management system. Therefore, the nonconformity should not simply be withdrawn on the spot.

E. Advise management that the information provided will be reviewed at the audit follow-up stage is acceptable because the auditee can submit corrective-action evidence after the audit. The certification decision and close-out process can consider additional evidence later, but that does not erase the nonconformity already supported by audit evidence gathered during the audit.

F. Note the OHS Manager ' s comments but indicate that there is evidence of a nonconformity that needs to be addressed is also acceptable because this is exactly what the audit team leader should do at the closing meeting: acknowledge the auditee’s response, but maintain the finding where objective evidence supports it.

Why the other options are not acceptable:

A is not appropriate at the closing meeting. The audit team should base findings on evidence gathered within the audit scope and timing, not start a new off-line investigation with contractors at that point.

B is weak audit management. The audit team leader should control the discussion and decision, not hand it over informally.

C is incorrect because the information is not irrelevant; it is relevant, but not sufficient to invalidate the nonconformity.

D is not acceptable because the email does not remove the original evidence of failure in Shelf-Fit’s contractor control process.