Last Attempt H12-811_V2.0 Questions

This statement is false . In an Eth-Trunk operating in LACP mode , if the administrator sets the maximum number of active links to 3 and there is 1 standby link, then when one active member fails, LACP can automatically promote the standby member to active status. The purpose of the standby member is to maintain the configured active-link capacity whenever possible.

Therefore, after one active link fails, the normal expectation is not that the active-link count is reduced from 3 to 2 while the standby link remains idle. Instead, the standby link should participate and replace the failed member, so that the Eth-Trunk continues operating with 3 active links if the standby link and negotiation conditions are normal. This reflects the redundancy and fast recovery capabilities of LACP-based aggregation. HCIA-Datacom highlights that compared with manual mode, LACP provides more intelligent link selection, active/standby management, and fault adaptation. The statement is wrong because it ignores the intended behavior of the standby link in maintaining the number of active forwarding links after a failure.

When two OSPF routers reach the Full state, it means that adjacency establishment has been successfully completed and the routers have synchronized the necessary link-state information for that area. For this to happen, the two routers must have different router IDs, so option A is correct. They must also belong to the same OSPF area on the interfaces used to form the adjacency, making option B correct. Once adjacency reaches Full state, the routers have synchronized their link-state databases for that area, so option D is also correct.

Option C is incorrect because the OSPF process ID is only locally significant on a device. Two neighboring routers do not need to use the same process ID to establish adjacency. HCIA-Datacom teaches that OSPF neighbor formation depends on matching parameters such as area ID, network type, hello/dead timers, authentication settings, and subnet consistency, but not on the locally configured process number. This question is important because many learners mistakenly believe the process ID must match between devices, while in fact OSPF uses protocol parameters exchanged in packets rather than local process labels to form neighbor relationships.