Universal Containers (UC) is concerned about the accuracy of their Customer information in Salesforce. They have recently created an enterprise-wide trusted source MDM for Customer data which they have certified to be accurate. UC has over 20 million unique customer records in the trusted source and Salesforce. What should an Architect recommend to ensure the data in Salesforce is identical to the MDM?
Universal Containers (UC) has a requirement to create an Account plan object that is related to the Account object. Each Account plan needs to have an Account object, but the accessibility requirement of the Account plan is different from the Account object. What should an Architect recommend?
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) plans to maintain contact preferences for customers and employees. NTO has implemented the following:
1. Customers are Person Accounts for their retail business.
2. Customers are represented as Contacts for their commercial business.
3. Employees are maintained as Users.
4. Prospects are maintained as Leads.
NTO needs to implement a standard communication preference management model for Person Accounts, Contacts, Users, and Leads.
Which option should the data architect recommend NTO to satisfy this requirement?
Universal Containers is integrating a new Opportunity engagement system with Salesforce. According to their Master Data Management strategy, Salesforce is the system of record for Account, Contact, and Opportunity data. However, there does seem to be valuable Opportunity data in the new system that potentially conflicts with what is stored in Salesforce. What is the recommended course of action to appropriately integrate this new system?