Download Latest JN0-460 Questions

According to the Juniper Mist Wired Assurance Configuration Guide, the foundational step for implementing Layer 2 segmentation within the Mist UI is the creation of a "Network". In the context of Mist Wired Assurance, a Network is logically synonymous with a Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN). To define a network, a user must navigate to the Networks section—located within an organization-level template, a site-level configuration, or an individual switch configuration—and click to add a new entry.

The two mandatory parameters for this step are naming the VLAN and providing the corresponding VLAN ID. The name serves as a human-readable alias (such as "Corporate_Data" or "IoT_Devices") that allows administrators to easily reference the segment across different parts of the configuration without constantly tracking numeric IDs. The VLAN ID is the specific numeric value (ranging from 1 to 4094) that will be used by the switch for 802.1Q tagging on the physical wire.

This step is a prerequisite for more advanced configurations. Once a network is created with its name and ID, it can then be selected within a Port Profile. While creating a port profile (Option C) or an access policy (Option D) are common tasks in the deployment workflow, they are dependent on the prior existence of a defined Network. For instance, a Port Profile defines how a port behaves (e.g., access vs. trunk), but it must point to a specific Network name to know which VLAN to assign to that interface. Similarly, site variables can be used to override these VLAN IDs at specific locations, but the base definition requires the initial pairing of a name and a default ID in the portal.

EVPN, when used with VXLAN, leveragesBGP MPLS/VXLAN control plane mechanisms. To prevent overlapping IP prefixes between different tenants or sites, EVPN uses aRoute Distinguisher (RD).

“In EVPN-VXLAN, the route distinguisher (RD) makes routes unique when overlapping IP prefixes or MAC addresses are advertised between multiple tenants or sites.”

Option A(designated forwarder) applies to multi-homing in EVPN, not prefix uniqueness.

Option B(Layer 2 gateway) does not prevent IP overlap; it bridges VLANs.

Option D(ESI) is used for identifying multi-homed Ethernet segments, not to differentiate overlapping subnets.

Option C(Route Distinguisher) is correct, as it uniquely identifies routes even if the IP addresses are the same across sites.

When a switch is claimed into a Mist organization, it appears in one of several states depending on connectivity and site assignment.

“After claiming, switches initially appear asUnassignedif they are not yet linked to a site. Once online and connected to Mist Cloud, they transition toConnectedstatus and begin receiving configurations and telemetry.”

Option A (Connected):Correct— indicates the switch is online and communicating with Mist Cloud.

Option B (Inactive):Incorrect — not a valid device state in Mist.

Option C (Active):Incorrect — “Active” is not a device state label in Mist.

Option D (Unassigned):Correct— indicates the switch has been claimed but not yet assigned to a site.

According to the Juniper Mist dashboard's firmware management interface shown in the exhibit, several key details of the switch upgrade process are visible. The "Upgrade switch firmware" dialog box is a standard component of Juniper Mist Wired Assurance used to manage Junos OS updates across the fabric.

The correct statement is that the switch will reboot after the upgrade. This is explicitly confirmed by the checkbox labeled "Reboot switch after image copy," which is currently selected in the exhibit. In Juniper's cloud-managed workflow, once the new software image is successfully transferred from the Mist cloud to the switch's local storage, the system requires a reboot to initialize the new Junos OS kernel and complete the installation process5. While some platforms support non-disruptive upgrades, the standard procedure for EX-series switches in a standalone or Virtual Chassis configuration typically involves a scheduled reboot to ensure the new version is correctly applied.

The other options are incorrect based on the visual evidence provided in the exhibit.

Option A: The exhibit clearly identifies the "Switch Model" as an EX2300-C-12P (the 'P' designating PoE support), not an EX2300-C-12T88.

Option C: The dialog box explicitly states "Total Switches selected to upgrade: 1," confirming this is a single-device operation rather than a bulk upgrade.

Option D: The "Upgrade to Version" field is set to 19.3R1.8, which indicates the target version, not the previous version10101010.

By providing these granular controls, Juniper Mist allows administrators to maintain strict version compliance across the site while choosing whether to immediately reboot or stage the image for a later maintenance window.