Free and Premium Juniper JN0-460 Dumps Questions Answers

During campus fabric deploymentin Mist AI, switches are onboarded usingclaim codesand must beassigned to the correct siteandonlineso that Mist can push configurations and validate connectivity.

“All switches to be included in a campus fabric must be claimed, online, and assigned to the target site before launching the Campus Fabric wizard. Mist Cloud automatically discovers their roles and builds the topology.”

Option A:Incorrect — switches must be site-assigned before fabric creation.

Option B:Correct— switches must beonlineto receive configurations from Mist.

Option C:Incorrect — offline devices cannot be configured or validated in the fabric wizard.

Option D:Correct— switches must beassigned to the correct sitefor topology creation.

According toJuniper Mist Wired Assurance documentation, three built-in diagnostic tools available for testing switch functionality areBounce Port,Ping, andCable Test.

Bounce Portallows you to disable and re-enable a port to reset connectivity.

Pingverifies Layer 3 reachability between the switch and target IPs.

Cable Testperforms diagnostics to detect wiring faults, impedance mismatches, or cable lengths.

These tools are accessed directly from theSwitch Testing Toolssection in the Mist dashboard and are available for EX Series and QFX Series switches onboarded to the Mist cloud.

In Juniper Mist, thesyslogfeature allows administrators to forward event messages and alerts from the Mist cloud to an external syslog server.

This is often used for centralized event monitoring, compliance, and correlation with tools like Splunk or SIEM systems.

Syslog operates over UDP or TCP and can capture switch events, system logs, and Marvis actions for both Wired and Wireless networks.

Juniper Mist AI for Wired uses group-based policy (GBP) to enforce segmentation within a single VRF, without requiring separate VRFs per user group. GBP tags classify endpoints logically (e.g., employees, guests, IoT devices) and enforce security rules across the EVPN-VXLAN fabric.

“Group-Based Policy (GBP) provides scalable segmentation by assigning tags to endpoints based on attributes such as user type, role, or device type. These GBP tags are then used in policies to control communication between groups.”

Option A is inefficient: assigning unique tags per endpoint is not scalable.

Option C is incorrect: GBP is identity-based segmentation, not location-based.

Option D is incorrect: assigning a single tag defeats the purpose of segmentation.

Option B is correct: the best practice is to assign GBP tags based on endpoint type (e.g., servers, staff, IoT, guests), which then drives policy enforcement.

According to the Juniper Mist Wired Assurance Configuration Guide, the foundational step for implementing Layer 2 segmentation within the Mist UI is the creation of a "Network". In the context of Mist Wired Assurance, a Network is logically synonymous with a Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN). To define a network, a user must navigate to the Networks section—located within an organization-level template, a site-level configuration, or an individual switch configuration—and click to add a new entry.

The two mandatory parameters for this step are naming the VLAN and providing the corresponding VLAN ID. The name serves as a human-readable alias (such as "Corporate_Data" or "IoT_Devices") that allows administrators to easily reference the segment across different parts of the configuration without constantly tracking numeric IDs. The VLAN ID is the specific numeric value (ranging from 1 to 4094) that will be used by the switch for 802.1Q tagging on the physical wire.

This step is a prerequisite for more advanced configurations. Once a network is created with its name and ID, it can then be selected within a Port Profile. While creating a port profile (Option C) or an access policy (Option D) are common tasks in the deployment workflow, they are dependent on the prior existence of a defined Network. For instance, a Port Profile defines how a port behaves (e.g., access vs. trunk), but it must point to a specific Network name to know which VLAN to assign to that interface. Similarly, site variables can be used to override these VLAN IDs at specific locations, but the base definition requires the initial pairing of a name and a default ID in the portal.

EVPN, when used with VXLAN, leveragesBGP MPLS/VXLAN control plane mechanisms. To prevent overlapping IP prefixes between different tenants or sites, EVPN uses aRoute Distinguisher (RD).

“In EVPN-VXLAN, the route distinguisher (RD) makes routes unique when overlapping IP prefixes or MAC addresses are advertised between multiple tenants or sites.”

Option A(designated forwarder) applies to multi-homing in EVPN, not prefix uniqueness.

Option B(Layer 2 gateway) does not prevent IP overlap; it bridges VLANs.

Option D(ESI) is used for identifying multi-homed Ethernet segments, not to differentiate overlapping subnets.

Option C(Route Distinguisher) is correct, as it uniquely identifies routes even if the IP addresses are the same across sites.

When a switch is claimed into a Mist organization, it appears in one of several states depending on connectivity and site assignment.

“After claiming, switches initially appear asUnassignedif they are not yet linked to a site. Once online and connected to Mist Cloud, they transition toConnectedstatus and begin receiving configurations and telemetry.”

Option A (Connected):Correct— indicates the switch is online and communicating with Mist Cloud.

Option B (Inactive):Incorrect — not a valid device state in Mist.

Option C (Active):Incorrect — “Active” is not a device state label in Mist.

Option D (Unassigned):Correct— indicates the switch has been claimed but not yet assigned to a site.

According to the Juniper Mist dashboard's firmware management interface shown in the exhibit, several key details of the switch upgrade process are visible. The "Upgrade switch firmware" dialog box is a standard component of Juniper Mist Wired Assurance used to manage Junos OS updates across the fabric.

The correct statement is that the switch will reboot after the upgrade. This is explicitly confirmed by the checkbox labeled "Reboot switch after image copy," which is currently selected in the exhibit. In Juniper's cloud-managed workflow, once the new software image is successfully transferred from the Mist cloud to the switch's local storage, the system requires a reboot to initialize the new Junos OS kernel and complete the installation process5. While some platforms support non-disruptive upgrades, the standard procedure for EX-series switches in a standalone or Virtual Chassis configuration typically involves a scheduled reboot to ensure the new version is correctly applied.

The other options are incorrect based on the visual evidence provided in the exhibit.

Option A: The exhibit clearly identifies the "Switch Model" as an EX2300-C-12P (the 'P' designating PoE support), not an EX2300-C-12T88.

Option C: The dialog box explicitly states "Total Switches selected to upgrade: 1," confirming this is a single-device operation rather than a bulk upgrade.

Option D: The "Upgrade to Version" field is set to 19.3R1.8, which indicates the target version, not the previous version10101010.

By providing these granular controls, Juniper Mist allows administrators to maintain strict version compliance across the site while choosing whether to immediately reboot or stage the image for a later maintenance window.

Wired AssurancedefinesSLEs (Service Level Expectations)to provide measurable performance indicators for wired networks. These metrics identify root causes of network degradation by monitoring switch health, connection success, and throughput performance.

“Juniper Mist Wired Assurance delivers AI-driven insights across key wired SLEs including Successful Connects, Throughput, and Switch Health, giving visibility into user experience and switch performance.”

Option A (Capacity):Incorrect — capacity is used in wireless SLEs, not wired.

Option B (Successful Connects):Correct— tracks connection success rate and anomalies.

Option C (Switch Health):Correct— monitors hardware, software, and PoE status.

Option D (Coverage):Incorrect — pertains to wireless SLEs.

Option E (Throughput):Correct— measures data transfer rate, latency, jitter, and loss.

According to Juniper’s Validated Designs (JVD) for campus fabrics, the Campus Fabric IP Clos (often referred to as a 5-stage Clos) is the architecture specifically engineered for high-scale environments supporting 10,000+ users. This design is characterized by extending the EVPN control plane and VXLAN data plane all the way to the access layer. By terminating VXLAN tunnels at the access switch—functioning as a Virtual Tunnel Endpoint (VTEP)—the network can seamlessly support both Layer 2 and Layer 3 devices directly at the edge of the fabric.

The primary driver for choosing IP Clos in large-scale deployments is its superior scalability. In this model, the core switches are shielded from the massive table sizes required to learn thousands of individual endpoint MAC and IP addresses. Instead, core devices only need to maintain reachability to the loopback addresses of the access layer switches. This reduction in the "flood and learn" pressure on the core is critical as the number of endpoints grows, ensuring that the core can scale far into the future with predictable growth.

Additionally, the IP Clos architecture provides the most flexible environment for microsegmentation using Group-Based Policies (GBP) and macrosegmentation using Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instances. Since routing occurs at the access device, "east-west" traffic between local endpoints remains efficient and does not need to traverse the distribution or core tiers. While EVPN Multihoming and Core-Distribution (CRB/ERB) models are effective for smaller sites or brownfield environments where access switches are legacy Layer 2-only devices, only the IP Clos architecture provides the end-to-end VXLAN capability required for high-density, future-proof campus fabrics.

TheMist UI(User Interface) is Juniper’s cloud-based management platform used tomanage both wired and wireless devices, including EX, QFX, and SRX platforms.

It provides centralized visibility, configuration, analytics, and AI-driven insights for the entire enterprise network infrastructure.

WithinWired Assurance, the Mist UI enables device claiming, switch templates, configuration management, and SLE monitoring.

According to Juniper Networks' validated designs for campus fabrics, the campus fabric core-distribution with edge-routed bridging (ERB) is the optimal architecture when high volumes of east-west traffic are present and access switches are restricted to Layer 2 operations. In an ERB design, the EVPN-VXLAN fabric extends from the core switches to the distribution switches.1 The critical differentiator is the placement of the default gateways (Integrated Routing and Bridging or IRB interfaces). In the ERB model, these gateways are moved from the core to the distribution layer, which effectively acts as the "edge" of the EVPN fabric.

By placing the Layer 3 gateways at the distribution layer, inter-VLAN (east-west) traffic is routed closer to the endpoints.2 This prevents the "hairpinning" effect found in Centrally-Routed Bridging (CRB) architectures, where traffic must travel all the way to the core layer to be routed between subnets before returning down to the distribution and access layers. This reduction in latency and core-link utilization is essential for modern campus environments with high server-to-server or client-to-client traffic patterns.

Furthermore, this architecture specifically accommodates Layer 2 access switches. In the ERB core-distribution model, the access switches are not part of the EVPN-VXLAN overlay; instead, they connect to the distribution tier using standard Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP) or ESI-LAG. This allows organizations to leverage existing legacy or lower-tier access switches that do not support advanced VXLAN capabilities while still benefiting from a robust, scalable EVPN-VXLAN fabric at the distribution and core layers.5 In contrast, while the campus fabric IP Clos also excels at handling east-west traffic, it requires the access switches themselves to perform VXLAN encapsulation/decapsulation (acting as VTEPs), which contradicts the requirement for access switches to operate only at Layer 2.

Group-Based Policy (GBP)is a Juniper EVPN-VXLAN feature that enablesmicrosegmentationwithout requiring multiple VRFs or VLANs. It is implemented within Juniper Mist’sWired Assurance and Campus Fabricframeworks.

“GBP provides scalable, identity-based segmentation for campus fabrics and is supported on EX4100 and EX4400 Series switches operating in EVPN-VXLAN mode under Mist management.”

The feature requires hardware and software support forEVPN-VXLAN and GBP tagging, which is currently available on specific EX models managed by Mist Cloud.

Option A:Correct— GBP requires compatible access switches, specifically EX4100 and EX4400 models.

Option B:Incorrect — GBP is centrally managed through Mist Cloud, not configured per switch.

Option C:Incorrect — GBP is provisioned via Mist Cloud, not the CLI.

Option D:Incorrect — GBP is not supported onallEVPN-capable switches; only on defined platforms (EX4100/EX4400).

Within Mist Insights,Client Eventsshow state transitions such asreassociationand IP-level issues likeDHCP Denied.

These help correlate connectivity issues across wired or wireless edge connections.

Juniper Mist AI collectstelemetry for Service Level Expectations (SLEs)across wired and wireless devices. This telemetry includes metrics such as time-to-connect, throughput, coverage, and switch performance.

“Service Level Expectation (SLE) data is collected from every device and stored for up toone monthin the Mist Cloud. This allows administrators to analyze historical performance trends and troubleshoot issues based on real-time and historical data.”

Option B (2 months):Incorrect — data is not retained this long.

Option C (7 days):Incorrect — telemetry retention is longer.

Option D (24 hours):Incorrect — too short for Mist SLE analytics.

Option A (1 month):Correct — Mist Cloud retains SLE telemetry for30 days (1 month).

In Juniper Mist role-based access control (RBAC),site-level administratorshave limited privileges to manage devices within their assigned sites.

They cannot modify organization-level templates or global settings but can performoperational tasks, includingrebooting APs or switchesand monitoring their status.

This ensures proper delegation of duties while maintaining centralized configuration control.

In theJuniper Mist AI for Wired dashboard, administrators can select one or more switch ports (as shown in the exhibit, e.g., port ge-0/0/25 on an EX4100-48MP). Once configuration changes are made — such as VLAN assignment, port profiles, PoE settings, or administrative state — theSave buttonmust be clicked to confirm and apply those changes to the device.

“When making configuration changes in the Mist switch interface, the Save button must be used to confirm the modifications. Clicking Save applies the selected port settings to the switch through Mist Cloud.”

Option Ais incorrect: saving does not create a backup. Backups and snapshots are handled through Mist’s configuration archive, not via the Save button.

Option Bis incorrect: Save does not reset configuration; instead, it commits changes.

Option Cis incorrect: there is no preview function tied to Save.

Option Dis correct: the Save button is explicitly forapplying configuration changesto the selected switch or port(s).

In acore-distribution campus fabricmodel, the EVPN-VXLAN overlay is establishedonly between the core and distribution tiers. Theaccess switches are not part of the EVPN fabric; they connect upstream to distribution but do not run VXLAN tunnels.

“In the core-distribution campus fabric, only the core and distribution layers participate in the EVPN-VXLAN topology. The access layer connects to the distribution switches and forwards traffic but does not take part in the EVPN-VXLAN fabric.”

Option A:Correct — EVPN-VXLAN is built between core and distribution tiers.

Option B:Incorrect — both coreand distributionparticipate, not just core.

Option C:Incorrect — access switches are excluded from EVPN-VXLAN participation.

Option D:Correct — the access layer does not participate in EVPN-VXLAN.

Abrownfield adoptionin Mist AI refers to onboarding existing Juniper switches (with existing configurations) into the Mist Cloud for management and monitoring. For the switch to connect successfully, it must be able to reach Mist Cloud services usingDNSandInternet connectivity.

“To onboard existing (brownfield) switches into Mist Cloud, the device must have outbound Internet connectivity and DNS resolution to discover Mist Cloud service endpoints.”

Option A:Correct— DNS is required for the switch to resolve Mist Cloud URLs.

Option B:Correct— Internet access is required for registration and telemetry exchange.

Option C:Incorrect — templates can be applied later but are not required for adoption.

Option D:Incorrect — Mist uses TCP ports 2200 or 443, not UDP 1280.

According to Juniper Mist documentation, the Throughput Service Level Expectation (SLE) is the primary metric used to measure the ability of wired clients to pass traffic across the physical network without impedance. This SLE is critical for diagnosing issues with real-time, high-bandwidth applications such as video streams, which are highly sensitive to packet loss and latency. Within the Throughput SLE, the Storm Control classifier is specifically designed to identify "bad user minutes" caused by the suppression of Broadcast, Unknown Unicast, and Multicast (BUM) traffic.

Storm control is a mechanism that enables the switch to monitor traffic levels and drop BUM packets when a specified traffic level—known as the storm control level—is exceeded. This prevents a "traffic storm" from proliferating and degrading the overall performance of the LAN. While this is a vital security feature to prevent network meltdowns, it can inadvertently impact legitimate traffic. For instance, if multicast-based video streams or other heavy BUM traffic exceed the configured bandwidth percentage on a port, the switch will drop those packets to protect the rest of the network.

When troubleshooting video stream issues, network administrators should inspect the Storm Control classifier to see if it is triggering "bad user minutes". If the Mist dashboard indicates failures under this classifier, it signifies that the switch hardware is actively dropping packets because the BUM traffic limit has been reached. This provides immediate root-cause evidence, allowing the administrator to determine if they need to adjust the storm control thresholds within the Port Profile or investigate the source of the excessive broadcast traffic. By correlating these hardware-level events with the end-user experience, Mist AI simplifies the resolution of complex performance problems that traditional "up/down" monitoring would miss.

Juniper Mist Cloud uses anopen RESTful API frameworkfor integration, automation, and programmability across all Mist services, includingWired Assurance,Marvis, andAI-driven automation.

“All Mist Cloud services are built on a 100% open REST API framework, allowing customers to automate configuration, monitoring, and troubleshooting through standard REST calls.”

The REST API exchanges data inJSONformat, but the API type itself isREST, not JSON.

Option A (REST):Correct— Mist services expose 100% REST-based APIs.

Option B (SOAP):Incorrect — SOAP is an older XML-based protocol not used in Mist.

Option C (JSON):Incorrect — JSON is thedata format, not the API type.

Option D (RPC):Incorrect — not used in the Mist Cloud architecture.

When deployingJuniper Mist Wired AssuranceinManaged mode, switches are fully integrated with Mist Cloud for configuration, monitoring, and AI-driven operations. Managed mode providescomplete cloud-based management, meaning Mist AI handles configuration, templates, telemetry, and SLE tracking.

“In Managed mode, the switch configuration is fully managed by Mist Cloud. Administrators configure switches, templates, and policies directly through the Mist dashboard. A valid Wired Assurance subscription is required for Managed mode operation.”

Option A:Incorrect — the “Monitor Only” mode is read-only, not Managed.

Option B:Correct— Managed mode requires aWired Assurance subscription.

Option C:Incorrect — subscriptions are mandatory for Mist-managed devices.

Option D:Correct— in Managed mode,all supported EX switches are fully managed by Mist AI, including configuration and telemetry.

Aport negotiation mismatchoccurs when the local and remote interfaces fail to agree on common speed or duplex settings.

Marvis Wired Assurance automatically detects this by analyzing telemetry from the switch’s physical interfaces.

You can resolve this by ensuringauto-negotiationis enabled on both ends (A) and verifying the peer device supports the802.3 autonegotiation standard(D).

Manually forcing half-duplex or replacing hardware is unnecessary unless the hardware is faulty.

“Marvis Wired Actions correlate interface negotiation errors with LLDP neighbor data to pinpoint mismatched configurations, helping administrators quickly verify speed/duplex compatibility and 802.3 autonegotiation support.”

In Juniper’scampus fabric architectures, the location of theLayer 3 gateway(IRB) differentiates between CRB and ERB models:

Centrally-Routed Bridging (CRB):L3 gateways are placed at thecore layer.

Edge-Routed Bridging (ERB):L3 gateways are placed at thedistribution layer, closer to the edge.

“In the ERB model, Layer 2 gateways are deployed at the access layer, andLayer 3 gateways are deployed at the distribution layer.”

Option A (CRB):Incorrect — L3 is at the core, not distribution.

Option B (IP Clos):Incorrect — in 3-stage Clos, L3 is pushed to the access layer.

Option D (EVPN multihoming):Incorrect — this is about redundancy, not gateway placement.

Option C (ERB):Correct — L3 gateways sit at thedistribution layerin the ERB architecture.

InJuniper Mist AI for Wired, configuration templates are a foundational part ofswitch onboarding and management. The primary purpose of these templates is to ensure configuration consistency across all switches that belong to a specific site or organization.

“Switch configuration templates allow administrators to define a standard configuration that is automatically applied to all switches within a site or organization, ensuring consistency and reducing configuration errors.”

Templates can contain base configuration parameters such as NTP, syslog, VLANs, port profiles, and authentication settings. When new switches are onboarded to the Mist Cloud, they automatically inherit the template’s configuration, ensuring uniform behavior across the network fabric.

Option Ais incorrect — templates do not directly impact hardware performance.

Option Bis incorrect — templates are not related to upgrade times.

Option Cis incorrect — templates are used for uniformity, not for switch-specific changes.

Option Dcorrectly describes their main benefit —ensuring consistent configuration across all switches.