Download Full Version JN0-460 Juniper Exam

Wired AssurancedefinesSLEs (Service Level Expectations)to provide measurable performance indicators for wired networks. These metrics identify root causes of network degradation by monitoring switch health, connection success, and throughput performance.

“Juniper Mist Wired Assurance delivers AI-driven insights across key wired SLEs including Successful Connects, Throughput, and Switch Health, giving visibility into user experience and switch performance.”

Option A (Capacity):Incorrect — capacity is used in wireless SLEs, not wired.

Option B (Successful Connects):Correct— tracks connection success rate and anomalies.

Option C (Switch Health):Correct— monitors hardware, software, and PoE status.

Option D (Coverage):Incorrect — pertains to wireless SLEs.

Option E (Throughput):Correct— measures data transfer rate, latency, jitter, and loss.

According to Juniper’s Validated Designs (JVD) for campus fabrics, the Campus Fabric IP Clos (often referred to as a 5-stage Clos) is the architecture specifically engineered for high-scale environments supporting 10,000+ users. This design is characterized by extending the EVPN control plane and VXLAN data plane all the way to the access layer. By terminating VXLAN tunnels at the access switch—functioning as a Virtual Tunnel Endpoint (VTEP)—the network can seamlessly support both Layer 2 and Layer 3 devices directly at the edge of the fabric.

The primary driver for choosing IP Clos in large-scale deployments is its superior scalability. In this model, the core switches are shielded from the massive table sizes required to learn thousands of individual endpoint MAC and IP addresses. Instead, core devices only need to maintain reachability to the loopback addresses of the access layer switches. This reduction in the "flood and learn" pressure on the core is critical as the number of endpoints grows, ensuring that the core can scale far into the future with predictable growth.

Additionally, the IP Clos architecture provides the most flexible environment for microsegmentation using Group-Based Policies (GBP) and macrosegmentation using Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instances. Since routing occurs at the access device, "east-west" traffic between local endpoints remains efficient and does not need to traverse the distribution or core tiers. While EVPN Multihoming and Core-Distribution (CRB/ERB) models are effective for smaller sites or brownfield environments where access switches are legacy Layer 2-only devices, only the IP Clos architecture provides the end-to-end VXLAN capability required for high-density, future-proof campus fabrics.

TheMist UI(User Interface) is Juniper’s cloud-based management platform used tomanage both wired and wireless devices, including EX, QFX, and SRX platforms.

It provides centralized visibility, configuration, analytics, and AI-driven insights for the entire enterprise network infrastructure.

WithinWired Assurance, the Mist UI enables device claiming, switch templates, configuration management, and SLE monitoring.

According to Juniper Networks' validated designs for campus fabrics, the campus fabric core-distribution with edge-routed bridging (ERB) is the optimal architecture when high volumes of east-west traffic are present and access switches are restricted to Layer 2 operations. In an ERB design, the EVPN-VXLAN fabric extends from the core switches to the distribution switches.1 The critical differentiator is the placement of the default gateways (Integrated Routing and Bridging or IRB interfaces). In the ERB model, these gateways are moved from the core to the distribution layer, which effectively acts as the "edge" of the EVPN fabric.

By placing the Layer 3 gateways at the distribution layer, inter-VLAN (east-west) traffic is routed closer to the endpoints.2 This prevents the "hairpinning" effect found in Centrally-Routed Bridging (CRB) architectures, where traffic must travel all the way to the core layer to be routed between subnets before returning down to the distribution and access layers. This reduction in latency and core-link utilization is essential for modern campus environments with high server-to-server or client-to-client traffic patterns.

Furthermore, this architecture specifically accommodates Layer 2 access switches. In the ERB core-distribution model, the access switches are not part of the EVPN-VXLAN overlay; instead, they connect to the distribution tier using standard Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP) or ESI-LAG. This allows organizations to leverage existing legacy or lower-tier access switches that do not support advanced VXLAN capabilities while still benefiting from a robust, scalable EVPN-VXLAN fabric at the distribution and core layers.5 In contrast, while the campus fabric IP Clos also excels at handling east-west traffic, it requires the access switches themselves to perform VXLAN encapsulation/decapsulation (acting as VTEPs), which contradicts the requirement for access switches to operate only at Layer 2.