JN0-460 Exam Dumps : JNCIS-MistAI-Wired

According to Juniper Mist documentation, the Throughput Service Level Expectation (SLE) is the primary metric used to measure the ability of wired clients to pass traffic across the physical network without impedance. This SLE is critical for diagnosing issues with real-time, high-bandwidth applications such as video streams, which are highly sensitive to packet loss and latency. Within the Throughput SLE, the Storm Control classifier is specifically designed to identify "bad user minutes" caused by the suppression of Broadcast, Unknown Unicast, and Multicast (BUM) traffic.

Storm control is a mechanism that enables the switch to monitor traffic levels and drop BUM packets when a specified traffic level—known as the storm control level—is exceeded. This prevents a "traffic storm" from proliferating and degrading the overall performance of the LAN. While this is a vital security feature to prevent network meltdowns, it can inadvertently impact legitimate traffic. For instance, if multicast-based video streams or other heavy BUM traffic exceed the configured bandwidth percentage on a port, the switch will drop those packets to protect the rest of the network.

When troubleshooting video stream issues, network administrators should inspect the Storm Control classifier to see if it is triggering "bad user minutes". If the Mist dashboard indicates failures under this classifier, it signifies that the switch hardware is actively dropping packets because the BUM traffic limit has been reached. This provides immediate root-cause evidence, allowing the administrator to determine if they need to adjust the storm control thresholds within the Port Profile or investigate the source of the excessive broadcast traffic. By correlating these hardware-level events with the end-user experience, Mist AI simplifies the resolution of complex performance problems that traditional "up/down" monitoring would miss.

During campus fabric deploymentin Mist AI, switches are onboarded usingclaim codesand must beassigned to the correct siteandonlineso that Mist can push configurations and validate connectivity.

“All switches to be included in a campus fabric must be claimed, online, and assigned to the target site before launching the Campus Fabric wizard. Mist Cloud automatically discovers their roles and builds the topology.”

Option A:Incorrect — switches must be site-assigned before fabric creation.

Option B:Correct— switches must beonlineto receive configurations from Mist.

Option C:Incorrect — offline devices cannot be configured or validated in the fabric wizard.

Option D:Correct— switches must beassigned to the correct sitefor topology creation.

According to Juniper Networks' validated designs for campus fabrics, the campus fabric core-distribution with edge-routed bridging (ERB) is the optimal architecture when high volumes of east-west traffic are present and access switches are restricted to Layer 2 operations. In an ERB design, the EVPN-VXLAN fabric extends from the core switches to the distribution switches.1 The critical differentiator is the placement of the default gateways (Integrated Routing and Bridging or IRB interfaces). In the ERB model, these gateways are moved from the core to the distribution layer, which effectively acts as the "edge" of the EVPN fabric.

By placing the Layer 3 gateways at the distribution layer, inter-VLAN (east-west) traffic is routed closer to the endpoints.2 This prevents the "hairpinning" effect found in Centrally-Routed Bridging (CRB) architectures, where traffic must travel all the way to the core layer to be routed between subnets before returning down to the distribution and access layers. This reduction in latency and core-link utilization is essential for modern campus environments with high server-to-server or client-to-client traffic patterns.

Furthermore, this architecture specifically accommodates Layer 2 access switches. In the ERB core-distribution model, the access switches are not part of the EVPN-VXLAN overlay; instead, they connect to the distribution tier using standard Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP) or ESI-LAG. This allows organizations to leverage existing legacy or lower-tier access switches that do not support advanced VXLAN capabilities while still benefiting from a robust, scalable EVPN-VXLAN fabric at the distribution and core layers.5 In contrast, while the campus fabric IP Clos also excels at handling east-west traffic, it requires the access switches themselves to perform VXLAN encapsulation/decapsulation (acting as VTEPs), which contradicts the requirement for access switches to operate only at Layer 2.