Download Full Version NSE7_FSN_AR-7.6 Fortinet Exam

The best verified answer is C .

The study guide says that when FortiGate is in conserve mode, it activates protection measures to recover memory space:

“System configuration cannot be changed”

“FortiGate skips quarantine actions (including FortiSandbox analysis)”

It also explains that inspection behavior can be reduced while in conserve mode:

“pass (default): All new sessions pass without inspection until FortiGate switches back to non-conserve mode.”

“The av-failopen setting also applies to flow-based antivirus inspection.”

The FortiOS administration guide summarizes this behavior as:

“This causes functions such as antivirus scanning to change how they operate to reduce the functionality and conserve memory without compromising security.”

That is why C is the closest correct choice: FortiGate can reduce functionality of some processes, especially antivirus-related inspection, to preserve memory.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because FortiGate does not automatically reboot as a default conserve-mode action. A reboot can be configured through an automation stitch , but that is an optional administrator-defined response, not the built-in conserve-mode behavior

B is wrong because the documentation does not say FortiGate switches from proxy-based inspection to flow-based inspection. Instead, it may pass traffic without inspection depending on av-failopen settings

D is not generally correct for conserve mode . The study guide says FortiGate starts dropping new sessions only when memory usage exceeds the extreme threshold : “If memory usage exceeds the extreme threshold, all new sessions that require inspection (flow-based or proxy-based) are blocked.”

So the verified answer is: C .

The correct answers are B and D .

The study guide explains that in the SP Login Dump section, FortiGate is acting as the service provider (SP) , and that you should read these fields:

“The IdP SSO URL, from the setting idp-single-sign-on-url in the FortiGate configuration”

“The SP SSO URL, from the setting single-sign-on-url in the FortiGate configuration”

“The IdP Entity ID, from the setting id-entity-id in the FortiGate configuration”

“The SP Entity ID, from the setting entity-id setting in the FortiGate configuration”

In the exhibit:

Destination= " " → this is the IdP SSO URL

< lasso:RemoteProviderID > < /lasso:RemoteProviderID > → this is the IdP Entity ID

AssertionConsumerServiceURL= " " → this is the SP SSO URL

< saml:Issuer > < /saml:Issuer > → this is the SP Entity ID

The same study-guide example shows this exact mapping pattern, where:

Destination points to the IdP

AssertionConsumerServiceURL and Issuer point to the SP

Therefore:

10.1.10.2 is the IdP → D

10.1.10.254 is the SP → B

So the verified answers are: B, D .

The correct answers are A and C .

The study guide describes this exact asymmetric ICMP scenario. It states:

“The server sends an echo request to the PC through port2 of the local router, effectively bypassing FortiGate. When it receives the echo request, the PC responds with an echo reply through its default gateway, 10.1.0.2, which is port1 on FortiGate. Because there is no existing session, the echo reply is dropped. All subsequent echo replies are blocked.”

That means the current problem exists because:

the ICMP request bypasses FortiGate

the ICMP reply goes through FortiGate

FortiGate has no matching session , so it drops the reply

The study guide then shows the exact corrective option:

“Allowing asymmetric routing:”

config system settings

set asymroute enable

end

It further explains:

“After the packet passes through the FortiGate CPU, FortiGate forwards the packet using the FIB, even though there are no session matches. FortiGate forwards all subsequent echo replies using the FIB.”

So A is correct.

The other valid fix is to make the traffic symmetric by changing the laptop’s default gateway so the reply no longer goes through FortiGate. In the exhibit, the alternate gateway is 10.1.0.254 , which is the local router on the same subnet. If the laptop uses 10.1.0.254 instead of 10.1.0.2, the ICMP echo reply follows the same bypass path as the echo request, so the server receives it without involving FortiGate session validation. This makes C correct.

Why the other options are wrong:

B is wrong because this is not an RPF problem. The study guide explains RPF as a reverse path lookup used to validate whether a packet arrived on a legitimate interface, mainly for spoofing protection. The issue in this scenario is a missing session due to asymmetric routing , not a strict-versus-feasible RPF failure

D is wrong because FortiGate already has the specific route 10.4.0.0/24 through port3 in the routing table shown in the exhibit, so adding a default static route to port3 is unnecessary and not the reason the echo reply is being dropped

So the verified answers are: A, C .

The study guide states:

“FortiGate categorizes an entry in the session table as an ephemeral session when it is a TCP session that is not fully established (three-way handshake not completed), or when it is a UDP session with only one packet received.”

This directly proves:

A is correct because a UDP session with only one packet received is ephemeral.

C is correct because a TCP session waiting for the SYN/ACK is not fully established , so it is ephemeral. The study guide’s TCP state table shows that the handshake is only completed when the session reaches ESTABLISHED

Why the other options are wrong:

B is wrong because once UDP traffic has been seen in both directions , it is no longer the “single packet received” condition described for ephemeral sessions. The study guide says for UDP: 00 = one way , 01 = both ways

D is wrong because a TCP session waiting for FIN/ACK is already in the closing stage after establishment, not in the “not fully established” stage. The study guide explains that after both sides close the session, FortiGate can keep it briefly in the table in state value 5 for out-of-order packets after FIN/ACK