CISI Investment Funds in Canada IFC New Questions

A beta of 1.4 indicates that the Optima Equity Fund is 1.4 times more volatile than the market. If the market rises by 5%, the fund is expected to rise by 5% × 1.4 = 7%. The feedback from the document states:

"One way to measure market risk is by calculating a portfolio’s beta. Beta shows how much a portfolio fluctuates when the market as a whole fluctuates. A higher beta means that the portfolio is exposed to more risk. The market has a beta of 1.0. In this example: The Optima Equity Fund has a beta of 1.4, which means the Fund is expected to be 1.4 times more volatile than the market as a whole. If the S&P/TSX Composite Index is used to measure the performance of the Optima Fund, then if the Index rose by 10% you would expect to see the Optima Fund rise by 14% (1.4 × 10%)."

The statement that is correct about Ken’s plan is option D. A defined benefit pension plan (DBPP) is a type of employer-sponsored retirement plan that promises to pay a specified amount of income to the plan member upon retirement. The amount of income is based on a formula that considers factors such as years of service, salary, and age. Income received from a DBPP is eligible for pension income splitting even if Ken retires before 65, meaning that he can transfer up to 50% of his eligible pension income to his spouse or common-law partner for tax purposes. This can reduce the overall tax payable by the couple if they are in different tax brackets. Therefore, option D is correct about Ken’s plan. The other statements are not correct about Ken’s plan. Option A is false because contributions to the plan do result in a Pension Adjustment (PA) for Ken, which is an amount that reduces his RRSP contribution room for the following year. Option B is false because the amount Ken receives in retirement does not depend on the performance of the investments he has selected within the plan; rather, it depends on the formula that determines his pension benefit. Option C is false because the amount that Ken will receive at retirement is guaranteed by the plan sponsor, unless the plan sponsor becomes insolvent or terminates the plan. References: [Defined Benefit Pension Plans | GetSmarterAboutMoney.ca], [Pension Income Splitting | GetSmarterAboutMoney.ca], [Pension Adjustment (PA) | GetSmarterAboutMoney.ca]

To ensure that retirement income projections maintain purchasing power, Michael must use the real rate of return, which adjusts investment returns for the effects of inflation. The Investment Funds in Canada text clearly distinguishes between nominal and real returns, stating that the nominal rate of return represents the stated or observed return on an investment, while the real rate of return reflects the true increase in purchasing power after inflation is taken into account.

Inflation reduces the amount of goods and services that a given dollar can buy over time. As a result, using nominal returns alone can significantly overstate the future value of an investment when planning for long-term goals such as retirement. The CIFC curriculum emphasizes that “investors are concerned with real returns because they measure the increase in purchasing power,” which is especially critical for retirement planning where income must sustain living standards over many years.

The annualized rate of return standardizes returns over multiple periods but does not automatically adjust for inflation. Similarly, the holding period return measures performance over a specific time frame without considering inflation’s impact. Neither method directly addresses purchasing power.

Therefore, because Michael’s objective is to maintain the real value of his retirement income, the real rate of return is the correct and most appropriate measure. This makes Option B the only answer that fully aligns with CIFC principles and retirement planning methodology.