PEGACPSA23V1 Exam Dumps : Certified Pega System Architect

For a home loan application that requires sequential approvals from the Legal team manager followed by the Finance team manager, setting up a process that enforces this order is crucial. The most straightforward and effective method to configure this requirement is through cascading approval.

• C. Create an approval step with cascading approval: This option involves setting up a single approval step in the case workflow that automatically moves from the first required approval (Legal team manager) to the second (Finance team manager) once the initial approval is granted. Cascading approvals enforce the necessary sequence while streamlining the process, ensuring that the case progresses in the correct order without manual intervention or complex routing logic.

Creating parallel approval processes (A) does not enforce the required sequence. Applying business logic to route a single assignment in the correct order (B) could potentially meet the requirement but may involve more complex configurations compared to cascading approval. Routing an assignment to a work queue where both roles have access (D) does not ensure the approvals occur in the specified sequence.

The step name "Investigate Claim" most accurately describes the activity where the customer service agent reviews the details of a fraud complaint. This naming is clear and action-oriented, specifying what the agent is doing (investigating) and the subject of the investigation (the claim). It is preferred over options like "Claim Investigation" or "Investigate Fraud" because it follows the verb-noun format that is recommended for naming steps in Pega, where the verb denotes the action and the noun denotes the object of the action.

In a scenario where an organization operates two lines of business with similar UI needs but differing payment methods, applying the Situational Layer Cake™ concept allows for efficient reuse of common functionalities while accommodating specific differences.

• B. Place the UI rules and generic payment method rules in the base layer, and create a new layer for the division-specific payment rules: This approach maximizes reuse by placing the shared UI components and any generic payment functionalities that apply to both divisions in the base layer of the application. Division-specific payment methods are then managed in separate layers on top of the base layer, allowing for tailored handling of payment options without duplicating the common UI elements.

Option A suggests a new layer for both lines of business, which might not efficiently leverage the commonalities between them. Creating a parallel base layer for payment rules (C) deviates from the hierarchical structure intended by the Situational Layer Cake™. Option D, creating a new layer for each division's payment rule, aligns with option B but is less clearly articulated regarding the placement of shared UI rules.