The exhibit shows an aggregate route configuration for the network172.21.0.0/22, which would summarize the specific networks172.21.0.0/24,172.21.1.0/24, and172.21.2.0/24. For an aggregate route to be active, it must have contributing routes in the routing table. If the route is hidden, it usually means there are no contributing routes that are active or the policy applied to the aggregate does not match any of the specific routes.Therefore, the first step in troubleshooting would be to verify that there are indeed active contributing routes for the aggregate to be valid.

References:

• Juniper documentation on routing policies and aggregates: Junos OS Routing Policies, Firewall Filters, and Traffic Policers User Guide

The adjacency SID in segment routing is advertised by one router to inform another about the label that should be used to forward traffic to it over a particular link. In this scenario, Router B would advertise an adjacency SID to Router A, which would be usedby Router A to forward traffic to Router B. Based on the exhibit, the adjacency SID that Router B advertises to Router A would be 12.

References:

• Juniper Networks documentation on Segment Routing: Segment Routing Overview

To verify the status of the tunnel from R1, you would issue a ping from the source address that is assigned to R1's end of the tunnel. In the exhibit, we can see that the tunnel interface (gre-0/0/0.0) has the IP address 198.51.100.1 on R1. Therefore, to test the tunnel's status, you should ping the IP address at the other end of the tunnel (which is likely the address on User B's interface or another interface on R2) from R1's tunnel source address.

References:

• Juniper Networks documentation on GRE: GRE Interface Configuration