The routers that are directly connected to the Dallas and Denver subnets are not advertising the connected subnets.  This can be resolved by redistributing the connected subnets into OSPF 1 .

Option C suggests to configure and apply a routing policy that redistributes the connected Dallas and Denver subnets.  This is correct because redistribution allows routes from one routing protocol to be communicated to another, and in this case, it allows the connected subnets to be advertised through OSPF 1 .

Option D suggests enabling the passive option on the OSPF interfaces that are connected to the Dallas and Denver subnets.  This is also correct because in OSPF, a passive interface is an interface that belongs to the OSPF router, but does not send OSPF Hello packets 1 .  It’s typically used on an interface that you don’t want to use for OSPF adjacencies, but you still want to advertise its IP address 1 . Therefore, enabling passive interface can help in advertising the Dallas and Denver subnets.

The output of the show bgp neighbor command shows the following information:

The local AS number of R1 is 65400, as indicated by the line “Local: 10.32.1.1+179 AS 65400”.

The peer AS number of 10.32.1.2 is 63645, as indicated by the line “Peer: 10.32.1.2+179 AS 63645”.

The BGP session is established, as indicated by the line “State: Established”.

The routers are exchanging IPv4 routes, as indicated by the line “Type: External State: Established Flags: < Sync > ” and the table showing the number of prefixes received and sent for inet.0 routing table. References:  Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) - Juniper Networks , [show bgp neighbor - Technical Documentation - Support - Juniper Networks]