Databricks-Certified-Professional-Data-Scientist Exam Dumps : Databricks Certified Professional Data Scientist Exam

The MAE measures the average magnitude of the errors in a set of forecasts, without considering their direction. It measures accuracy for continuous variables. The equation is given in the library references. Expressed in words, the MAE is the average over the verification sample of the absolute values of the differences between forecast and the corresponding observation. The MAE is a linear score which means that all the individual differences are weighted equally in the average.

The sum of absolute errors is a valid metric, but doesn't give any useful sense of how the recommender system is performing.

Support vector count and cluster density do not apply to recommender systems.

MAE and AUC are both valid and useful metrics for measuring recommender systems.

If you re trying to predict or forecast a target value, then you need to look into supervised learning. If not, then unsupervised learning is the place you want to be. If you've chosen supervised learning, what's your target value? Is it a discrete value like Yes/No, 1/2/3, A/B/C: or Red/Yellow/Black? If so, then you want to look into classification. If the target value can take on a number of values, say any value from 0.00 to 100.00, or-999 to 999, or+_to -_, then you need to look into regression. If you're not trying to predict a target value: then you need to look into unsupervised learning. Are you trying to fit your data into some discrete groups? If so and that's all you need, you should look into clustering. Do you need to have some numerical estimate of how strong the fit is into each group? If you answer yes then you probably should look into a density estimation algorithm.

Given two random variables X and Y whose joint distribution is known, the marginal distribution of X is simply the probability distribution of X averaging over information about Y. It is the probability distribution of X when the value of Y is not known. This is typically calculated by summing or integrating the joint probability distribution over Y. '

For discrete random variables, the marginal probability mass function can be written as Pr(X = x). This is

Text Description automatically generated with low confidence

where Pr(X = x,Y = y) is the joint distribution of X and Y, while Pr(X = x|Y = y) is the conditional distribution of X given Y In this case, the variable Y has been marginalized out.

Bivariate marginal and joint probabilities for discrete random variables are often displayed as two-way tables.

Similarly for continuous random variables, the marginal probability density function

can be written as pX(x). This is

Diagram Description automatically generated with medium confidence

where pX.Y(x.y) gives the joint distribution of X and Y while pX|Y(x|y) gives the

conditional distribution for X given Y Again: the variable Y has been marginalized

out.

Note that a marginal probability can always be written as an expected value:

Text, letter Description automatically generated

Intuitively, the marginal probability of X is computed by examining the conditional probability of X given a particular value of Y, and then averaging this conditional probability over the distribution of all values of Y This follows from the definition of expected value, i.e. in general

A picture containing diagram Description automatically generated