CPSA-FL Exam Dumps : ISAQB Certified Professional for Software Architecture -Foundation Level

The techniques best suited to illustrate the interaction of runtime building blocks are:A. Activity diagrams - Useful for showing the flow of control among various activities and decisions in the system.B. Sequence diagrams - Ideal for depicting the order of messages exchanged between components or objects in a specific scenario.C. State diagram - Shows how a component or an object changes its state in response to events, highlighting dynamic behavior.G. Depiction of screen flows (sequence of user interactions) - Useful for visualizing the sequence of user interactions with the system, which is critical for user-centric design and runtime behavior analysis.

The performance of a system often competes with its:

• Flexibility (A) - True1
• Memory usage (B) - True1
• On-time completion of the project C - False
• Adaptability (D) - True1
• Usability (E) - True1
• Security (F) - True1
• Testability (G) - True

In system design, performance trade-offs are a critical consideration. Here’s an explanation of how each listed aspect competes with system performance:

• Flexibility (A): Systems designed for high performance may be less flexible because they are optimized for specific tasks or conditions1.
• Memory Usage (B): High-performance systems may require more memory to store data and instructions for rapid access, which can be at odds with limited memory resources1.
• On-time Completion of the Project ©: While performance considerations can impact project timelines, they do not inherently compete with the on-time completion of a project.
• Adaptability (D): Systems that need to perform well under varying conditions may sacrifice adaptability, as they are tightly coupled with their performance optimizations1.
• Usability (E): Sometimes, the pursuit of performance can lead to complex user interfaces or workflows, affecting usability negatively1.
• Security (F): Security measures can introduce additional processing and checks, potentially slowing down system performance1.
• Testability (G): High-performance systems may be harder to test due to their complexity and the need for specialized testing environments or tools1.

These trade-offs highlight the importance of balancing different system attributes to meet the overall goals and constraints of a project.

References:

• CodingDrills article on Trade-Offs in System Design1

A) FalseB) TrueC) True

In a system with a multitude of class dependencies, the following measures can be considered:

A) The dependencies between classes are the responsibility of the developers. No measures are required within the architecture: This is false. While developers do manage day-to-day class dependencies, architectural measures are necessary to address systemic issues in a mature system1.

B) Loosening of direct dependencies between classes through the introduction of interfaces: This is true. Introducing interfaces can decouple classes and allow for more flexible and maintainable code1.

C) Loosening of direct dependencies between classes through the introduction of factories: This is also true. Factories can provide a way to create instances of classes without specifying the exact class, thus reducing dependencies1.

These measures align with the iSAQB® SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE – FOUNDATION LEVEL guidelines, which suggest that managing dependencies is crucial for maintaining and extending systems effectively1.