ARA-C01 Exam Dumps : SnowPro Advanced: Architect Certification Exam

 A star schema model is a type of dimensional data model that consists of a single fact table and multiple dimension tables. A 3NF model is a type of relational data model that follows the third normal form, which eliminates data redundancy and ensures referential integrity. A Snowflake Architect might use a star schema model rather than a 3NF model when designing a data architecture to run in Snowflake for the following reasons:

A star schema model is more suitable for analytical queries that require aggregating and slicing data across different dimensions, such as those performed by a BI tool. A 3NF model is more suitable for transactional queries that require inserting, updating, and deleting individual records.

A star schema model is simpler and faster to query than a 3NF model, as it involves fewer joins and less complex SQL statements. A 3NF model is more complex and slower to query, as it involves more joins and more complex SQL statements.

A star schema model can provide a simple flattened single view of the data to a particular group of end users, such as business analysts or data scientists, who need to explore and visualize the data. A 3NF model can provide a more detailed and normalized view of the data to a different group of end users, such as application developers or data engineers, who need to maintain and update the data.

The other options are not valid reasons for choosing a star schema model over a 3NF model in Snowflake:

Snowflake can handle the joins implied in a 3NF data model, as it supports ANSI SQL and has a powerful query engine that can optimize and execute complex queries efficiently.

The Architect can use both star schema and 3NF models to remove data duplication from the data stored in Snowflake, as both models can enforce data integrity and avoid data anomalies. However, the trade-off is that a star schema model may have more data redundancy than a 3NF model, as it denormalizes the data for faster query performance, while a 3NF model may have less data redundancy than a star schema model, as it normalizes the data for easier data maintenance.

The Architect can use both star schema and 3NF models to design a landing zone to receive raw data into Snowflake, as both models can accommodate different types of data sources and formats. However, the choice of the model may depend on the purpose and scope of the landing zone, such as whether it is a temporary or permanent storage, whether it is a staging area or a data lake, and whether it is a single source or a multi-source integration.

Snowflake Architect Training

Data Modeling: Understanding the Star and Snowflake Schemas

Data Vault vs Star Schema vs Third Normal Form: Which Data Model to Use?

Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: 5 Key Differences

Dimensional Data Modeling - Snowflake schema

Star schema vs Snowflake Schema

 The most efficient solution is to ask the partner to create a share and add the company’s account (Option A). This way, the company can access the live data from the partner without any data movement or manual intervention. Snowflake’s secure data sharing feature allows data providers to share selected objects in a database with other Snowflake accounts. The shared data is read-only and does not incur any storage or compute costs for the data consumers. The data consumers can query the shared data directly or create local copies of the shared objects in their own databases. Option B is not efficient because it involves using the data lake export feature, which is intended for exporting data from Snowflake to an external data lake, not for importing data from another Snowflake account. The data lake export feature also requires the data provider to create an external stage on cloud storage and use the COPY INTO command to export the data into parquet files. The data consumer then needs to create an external table or a file format to load the data from the cloud storage into Snowflake. This process can be complex and costly, especially if the data changes frequently. Option C is not efficient because it does not solve the problem of manual data ingestion and adaptation. Keeping the current structure of daily JSON extracts on an FTP server and requesting the partner to stop changing files, instead only appending new files, does not improve the efficiency or reliability of the data ingestion process. The company still needs to upload the data to Snowflake manually and deal with any schema changes or data quality issues. Option D is not efficient because it requires the partner to set up a Snowflake reader account and use that account to get the data for ingestion. A reader account is a special type of account that can only consume data from the provider account that created it. It is intended for data consumers who are not Snowflake customers and do not have a licensing agreement with Snowflake. A reader account is not suitable for data ingestion from another Snowflake account, as it does not allow uploading, modifying, or unloading data. The company would need to use external tools or interfaces to access the data from the reader account and load it into their own account, which can be slow and expensive. References: The answer can be verified from Snowflake’s official documentation on secure data sharing, data lake export, and reader accounts available on their website. Here are some relevant links:

Introduction to Secure Data Sharing | Snowflake Documentation

Data Lake Export Public Preview Is Now Available on Snowflake | Snowflake Blog

Managing Reader Accounts | Snowflake Documentation

The DATA_RETENTION_TIME_IN_DAYS parameter controls the Time Travel retention period for an object (database, schema, or table) in Snowflake. This parameter specifies the number of days for which historical data is preserved and can be accessed using Time Travel operations (SELECT, CREATE … CLONE, UNDROP)1.

The requirement for recovery of staging tables on a rolling 7-day basis means that the DATA_RETENTION_TIME_IN_DAYS parameter should be set to 7 at the database level. However, this parameter can be overridden at the lower levels (schema or table) if they have a different value1.

Therefore, one possible cause for certain tables to remain unrecoverable past 1 day is that the DATA_RETENTION_TIME_IN_DAYS for the staging schema has been set to 1 day. This would override the database level setting and limit the Time Travel retention period for all the tables in the schema to 1 day. To fix this, the parameter should be unset or set to 7 at the schema level1. Therefore, option B is correct.

Another possible cause for certain tables to remain unrecoverable past 1 day is that the staging tables are of the TRANSIENT type. Transient tables are tables that do not have a Fail-safe period and can have a Time Travel retention period of either 0 or 1 day. Transient tables are suitable for temporary or intermediate data that can be easily reproduced or replicated2. Tofix this, the tables should be created as permanent tables, which can have a Time Travel retention period of up to 90 days1. Therefore, option D is correct.

Option A is incorrect because the MANAGED ACCESS feature is not related to the data recovery requirement. MANAGED ACCESS is a feature that allows granting access privileges to objects without explicitly granting the privileges to roles. It does not affect the Time Travel retention period or the data availability3.

Option C is incorrect because there is no 1 TB limit for data recovery in Snowflake. The data storage size does not affect the Time Travel retention period or the data availability4.

Option E is incorrect because there is no ALLOW_RECOVERY privilege in Snowflake. The privilege required to perform Time Travel operations is SELECT, which allows querying historical data in tables5.

 Understanding & Using Time Travel : Transient Tables : Managed Access : Understanding Storage Cost : Table Privileges