300-110 Exam Dumps : Designing Cisco Wireless Networks

In a wireless network design where anchor redundancy is required for guest access, setting different priorities for the anchor controllers ensures deterministic primary and backup behavior. Cisco anchor priority uses a lower numerical value to indicate higher preference — Priority 1 is the highest priority (most preferred) anchor, and Priority 3 is lower priority. Setting Anchor A to priority 1 (Option D) makes it the primary anchor controller — all new guest client sessions will preferentially anchor to Anchor A. Setting Anchor B to priority 3 makes it the standby anchor — guest clients will only be anchored to Anchor B when Anchor A is unavailable. This creates a clear primary/backup relationship with deterministic failover. Setting both anchors to the same priority (Options A and C) would result in load balancing between the two anchors rather than active/standby behavior. Option B incorrectly reverses the priorities, making Anchor B the primary and Anchor A the backup. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — Guest Anchor Redundancy Design, Anchor Priority Configuration, DMZ Anchor WLC Architecture.

The design requirements specify a multi-LAG configuration where each LAG connects to a single switch, different VLANs are assigned to different LAGs, the controller must dynamically learn partner LAG capabilities per port, and standby ports provide redundancy upon active port failure. These requirements collectively point to IEEE 802.3ad LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol) as the correct protocol. LACP is the industry-standard IEEE protocol that enables dynamic negotiation of LAG membership between endpoints — the WLC and each Catalyst 9300 switch exchange LACP PDUs (LACPDUs) to discover port capabilities, negotiate bundle membership, and monitor link status. LACP supports active and passive port states where active ports initiate negotiation and passive ports respond, and it provides the standby port mechanism through its hot-standby capability for link redundancy within the bundle. The requirement to ' learn the identity of partners that can support LAG capabilities ' is the defining characteristic of LACP ' s standardized PDU exchange mechanism. PAgP (Option C) is a Cisco proprietary port aggregation protocol that, while functionally similar, is not the IEEE standard and is incompatible with non-Cisco equipment in mixed environments. OSPF (Option B) and BGP (Option D) are Layer 3 routing protocols entirely unrelated to port channel negotiation. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — Catalyst 9800 LAG Configuration, LACP IEEE 802.3ad, Multi-LAG High Availability Design.

To focus the coverage heat map on the desired coverage threshold, the engineer should use the RSSI slider to set the heat map to the desired cutoff filter. This action adjusts the display to show only the signal levels that meet or exceed the specified RSSI value, effectively filtering out weaker signals and highlighting areas with sufficient coverage. In Ekahau and similar survey tools, the RSSI slider provides a dynamic way to set minimum signal thresholds, allowing the engineer to quickly validate whether coverage meets design targets such as -67 dBm for voice or -70 dBm for data. Changing the color scheme (Option A) only modifies the visual representation without filtering data. The RSSI calibration tool (Option B) adjusts how the tool perceives signal levels, not the display filter. Filtering by AP (Option D) would remove APs from the view, potentially hiding coverage gaps. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — Post-Deployment Survey, Ekahau Heat Map Tools, RSSI Coverage Filtering.