Free and Premium NCC EFM Dumps Questions Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract Without Any URLs or Links:

According to the NCC C-EFM 2025 Exam Content Outline and recommended references such as AWHONN Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles, Simpson & Miller (Fetal Monitoring Text), and Menihan’s EFM Guide, recurrent variable or late decelerations with minimal or moderate variability during the second stage of labor—particularly when the patient has been pushing for ≥2 hours—indicate progressive fetal intolerance of labor.

AWHONN states that when the fetal tracing displays recurrent variable decelerations with ongoing stress from long second stage, the recommended intervention is operative or expedited vaginal birth, provided the fetal station is at +2 or lower. AWHONN and Simpson emphasize that reducing oxytocin is insufficient when the tracing demonstrates ongoing significant decelerations during active pushing with adequate descent.

The NCC blueprint within Pattern Recognition & Intervention emphasizes:

Identifying worsening recurrent decelerations

Acting when fetal tolerance is decreasing

Prioritizing timely intervention when the second stage exceeds standard limits with a non-reassuring tracing

Because she is fully dilated, vertex at +2, and tracing shows recurrent decelerations during pushing, the evidence-based next step is expediting birth, typically via operative vaginal delivery.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

Both fetal tracings (A and B) show:

Baselines around 140–150 bpm

Moderate variability

Intermittent accelerations

No recurrent decelerations

Normal contraction pattern

Overall Category I patterns for both twins

NCC, NICHD, and AWHONN emphasize that moderate variability with a normal baseline is the strongest reassurance of fetal well-being, even in multifetal gestations.

There is no evidence of:

Tachysystole

Recurrent variables

Recurrent lates

Prolonged decelerations

Category III patterns

Therefore, the appropriate action is ongoing observation.

Why the incorrect answers are wrong:

A. Cesarean birth — Not indicated with Category I FHR patterns.

C. Terbutaline — Reserved for tachysystole or prolonged deceleration patterns, not present here.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Emergency Fetal Response Principles:

Following an eclamptic seizure:

Maternal hypoxia, apnea, and intense sympathetic discharge occur

Uteroplacental perfusion drops

Fetus experiences acute hypoxemia

The expected fetal heart rate response is a prolonged bradycardia

This is well-described in NCC and AWHONN emergency physiology:

“Post-seizure fetal bradycardia is common and often resolves within 5–10 minutes as maternal oxygenation stabilizes.”

Why other answers are incorrect:

B. Sinusoidal pattern — Rare and usually indicates fetal anemia, not post-seizure status.

C. Variable decelerations — Associated with cord compression, not seizures.

Correct answer: A. Bradycardia

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

Vagal stimulation is part of the parasympathetic nervous system, which causes:

Slowing of the fetal heart rate (FHR)

Rapid but temporary changes in HR

Seen with head compression, scalp stimulation, or fetal movement

NICHD/NCC physiology explains:

Vagus nerve activation → acetylcholine release → slowed SA node firing → decrease in FHR

This mechanism is responsible for early decelerations during labor due to head compression.

Why the incorrect answers are wrong:

B. Increased cardiac contractility → sympathetic effect, not vagal.

C. Increased fetal blood pressure → also a sympathetic effect.

Correct answer: A. Decreased fetal heart rate

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (No URLs or Links)

NCC-recommended physiologic texts (AWHONN, Menihan, Simpson, Creasy & Resnik) explain that variable decelerations are caused by umbilical cord compression. This process occurs in a three-step sequence, well known in fetal monitoring physiology:

Umbilical vein occlusion occurs first → decreases fetal venous return → brief fetal acceleration (a compensatory sympathetic response).

Umbilical artery occlusion follows → increases fetal systemic vascular resistance → variable deceleration as vagal stimulation lowers the fetal heart rate.

Release of compression → post-deceleration acceleration may occur.

Thus, an acceleration immediately before a variable deceleration represents the initial compression of the umbilical vein, not a hypoxic response. This is a normal physiologic response to transient cord compression, often described in AWHONN and Menihan's physiologic explanation of “shoulders” around variable decelerations.

Oligohydramnios can contribute to cord compression but does not explain accelerations preceding the deceleration. A “hypoxic reflex” would not produce a pre-deceleration acceleration.

Therefore, the correct physiologic cause is:

Umbilical vein occlusion.

References (No URLs)

NCC C-EFM Candidate Guide 2025 – Physiology

AWHONN Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles

Menihan: Electronic Fetal Monitoring

Simpson & Creehan: Perinatal Nursing

Creasy & Resnik: Maternal–Fetal Medicine

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

Amnioinfusion is considered an intrauterine resuscitative intervention used specifically for recurrent variable decelerations caused by cord compression. NCC, AWHONN, Miller, and Menihan consistently teach that variables occur when the umbilical cord becomes compressed, reducing fetal oxygenation. When oligohydramnios or decreased amniotic fluid volume is present, the cord is more vulnerable to compression.

Why amnioinfusion is used:

Amnioinfusion works by:

Increasing intraamniotic fluid volume

Reducing umbilical cord compression

Decreasing the frequency and severity of variable decelerations

This directly targets the pathophysiology behind recurrent variables.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Dilute thick meconium – NOT supported by NCC

Historically, amnioinfusion was studied for meconium dilution, but major organizations—including NCC-aligned sources—state that amnioinfusion is NOT recommended for the sole purpose of diluting meconium. It does not reduce meconium aspiration syndrome and is no longer indicated for that purpose.

B. Restore uterine blood flow – NOT accurate

Uterine blood flow is addressed through maternal positioning, fluid bolus, reducing uterine tachysystole, and minimizing vasoconstriction—not via amnioinfusion. Amnioinfusion does not physiologically affect uterine perfusion.

C. Treat oligohydramnios – CORRECT

Recurrent variables with thick meconium often occur in the setting of low fluid, which worsens cord compression.

NCC-recommended indications include:

Recurrent variable decelerations unresponsive to repositioning

Suspected or confirmed oligohydramnios

Thick meconium may be associated with low fluid, but the purpose of amnioinfusion is to alleviate cord compression by restoring fluid volume, not to dilute the meconium.

Thus, the correct answer is C. Treat oligohydramnios.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

Accurate classification of decelerations requires evaluating their shape, onset, nadir, recovery, relationship to contractions, and variability characteristics. NCC uses the NICHD standardized definitions, reinforced across AWHONN, Miller’s Pocket Guide, Menihan, Simpson, and Creasy & Resnik.

Key features in this tracing:

Abrupt onsetThe FHR drops rapidly from baseline to nadir in less than 30 seconds—this is the defining hallmark of a variable deceleration per NICHD.

Sharp V-shape and deep amplitudeThe tracing shows steep descents and ascents, characteristic of cord compression–type variable decelerations.

Inconsistent timing with contractionsThe decelerations do not begin at the start of contractions (as early decelerations would) and do not consistently begin after the peak of contractions (as late decelerations would). Variable decelerations can occur before, during, or after a contraction—exactly what is demonstrated here.

Rapid return to baselineAnother core feature of variable decelerations in NICHD/NCC definitions.

No uniform contraction relationshipEarly decelerations are symmetrical and mirror contractions. Late decelerations begin after the peak of the contraction. This strip does not match either pattern.

Differentiation per NCC-aligned definitions:

Early Decelerations:Gradual onset (>30 sec), nadir mirrors contraction peak, shallow, uniform.Not present.

Late Decelerations:Gradual descent, nadir after contraction peak, smooth shape.Not present.

Variable Decelerations:Abrupt onset (<30 sec), variable timing, sharp V-shape, rapid recovery, often with shoulders.Exactly matches the tracing.

Therefore, according to NICHD/NCC criteria, the decelerations shown are variable decelerations.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (No URLs):

NCC references (AWHONN, Menihan, Simpson, Creasy & Resnik) consistently state that fetal accelerations are a reassuring sign of intact neurologic function. Accelerations represent the interaction of both the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches moderated through the central nervous system, reflecting effective autonomic regulation.

AWHONN specifically describes fetal accelerations as:

• A maturity marker of CNS function,

• Reflecting vigorous fetal movement,

• Demonstrating adequate oxygenation,

• Indicating a well-oxygenated brainstem and cortex.

Simpson & Miller emphasize that accelerations require both systems to be functioning and respond appropriately, which confirms CNS integration, not sympathetic or parasympathetic dominance alone.

Therefore, spontaneous accelerations indicate an integrated CNS response, making Option C the correct NCC-aligned answer.

=====================================================================

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

Placental calcifications:

Reduce surface area for maternal–fetal gas exchange

Impair placental perfusion

Are associated with post-dates and chronic insufficiency

Decrease the placenta’s ability to oxygenate the fetus

Why the incorrect answers are wrong:

A. Increased maternal cardiac output → improves uteroplacental perfusion.

B. Open-glottis pushing → improves oxygenation compared with closed-glottis Valsalva pushing.

Correct answer: Placental calcifications.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

The tracing shows:

Baseline approx. 120 bpm

Minimal variability (amplitude <5 bpm) across the entire strip

No accelerations

No decelerations

Contractions present but not excessive

NCC defines:

Category I requires moderate variability → not present.

Category III requires absent variability with recurrent decels, bradycardia, or sinusoidal pattern → not present.

Thus this falls into Category II: “indeterminate.”

Minimal variability for this length of time cannot be considered a normal baseline, especially in the setting of vaginal bleeding, which raises concern for:

Abruption

Maternal anemia

Hypovolemia

Decreased uteroplacental perfusion

There is no evidence of dysrhythmia (no irregular R-R intervals, no chaotic spikes, no sawtooth pattern).

Therefore, the correct interpretation is A. An indeterminate pattern (Category II).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (NCC C-EFM sources: AWHONN, Miller’s Pocket Guide, Menihan, Simpson, Creasy & Resnik, 2025 Candidate Guide)

The tracing displays baseline fetal bradycardia, with a rate near 100 bpm, minimal variability, and preserved periodic response. According to AWHONN’s Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles & Practices and Menihan’s Electronic Fetal Monitoring, maternal conditions that reduce oxygen-carrying capacity—including maternal anemia—can lead to lower fetal oxygen delivery, prompting a fetal compensatory bradycardic baseline.

Creasy & Resnik’s Maternal-Fetal Medicine notes that sickle cell anemia decreases maternal hemoglobin function even when maternal vital signs appear stable, reducing uteroplacental oxygen transport. Fetuses of mothers with sickling disorders may demonstrate lower resting fetal heart rates due to chronic mild hypoxemia.

Conversely, Eisenmenger’s syndrome is associated with severe maternal cyanosis and high fetal mortality, often producing late decelerations and growth restriction rather than mild bradycardia. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is commonly associated with heart block (especially with anti-Ro/SSA antibodies), which is not displayed here, as true heart block presents with a fixed atrial–ventricular dissociation and FHR < 60 bpm.

Thus, based on fetal physiology and maternal disease correlations taught in NCC-recommended sources, the tracing is most consistent with maternal sickle cell anemia.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

NICHD Category II includes:

Minimal variability

Marked variability

Absent accelerations without recurrent decelerations

Indeterminate baseline characteristics

A tracing with no accelerations and no decelerations becomes Category II if paired with marked variability, because marked variability indicates potential stress.

Why other answers are wrong:

A. FHR 110 bpm → normal baseline if variability normal.

B. Sinusoidal pattern → Category III, not Category II.

Correct answer: Marked variability.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

Maternal hyperthermia—most commonly from infection—causes a rise in fetal temperature, which increases fetal metabolic rate. The fetus responds by increasing heart rate to meet the increased oxygen demand.

Effects include:

Increased fetal oxygen consumption

Enhanced fetal cardiac output

Resultant tachycardia, often 160–180 bpm

This mechanism is repeatedly outlined in NCC’s physiology domain, AWHONN, Menihan, Simpson, and Creasy & Resnik.

Option A is incorrect because maternal fever does not reduce perfusion.

Option C is incorrect because catecholamines are often elevated, not inhibited.

Thus, the mechanism is increased fetal metabolism.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

Sustained fetal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) often produces heart rates > 200–240 bpm, causing:

Poor ventricular filling

Decreased stroke volume

Reduced cardiac output

Congestive heart failure

Progressive fluid accumulation

NCC and AWHONN emphasize that untreated SVT leads to hydrops fetalis, characterized by:

Ascites

Pleural effusion

Pericardial effusion

Skin edema

Why the other answers are incorrect:

A. Fetal anemia — Causes tachycardia but is not caused by SVT.

C. Neonatal pacemaker — Pacemakers treat heart block, not SVT.

Correct answer: B. Hydrops fetalis

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract NCC-Recommended Sources

Oxygen saturation refers to the percentage of hemoglobin binding sites occupied by oxygen. NCC physiology resources, including Simpson & Creehan and Creasy & Resnik, define oxygen saturation as the “ratio of oxyhemoglobin to total hemoglobin”—the same definition used in fetal oxygenation discussions.

Oxygen affinity refers to hemoglobin’s tendency to bind oxygen (related to the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve).

Oxygen carrying capacity refers to the total amount of oxygen hemoglobin can transport, independent of current saturation.

AWHONN and Menihan emphasize that fetal oxygenation assessment is dependent on understanding oxygen saturation, not affinity or carrying capacity, when discussing fetal hypoxemia and gas exchange.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

NICHD/NCC definitions:

Prolonged deceleration: decrease in FHR ≥15 bpm lasting 2 to 10 minutes

Bradycardia: baseline FHR <110 bpm lasting ≥10 minutes

The differentiating factor is duration, not rate and not contraction relationship.

Before 10 minutes → prolonged deceleration

At or beyond 10 minutes → new baseline → bradycardia

Thus, the factor that differentiates the two is length of time it lasts.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (NCC-Referenced Sources)

According to the NCC C-EFM Exam Outline and AWHONN Fetal Heart Monitoring (5th & 6th ed.), recurrent variable decelerations with progressive reduction in variability reflect worsening fetal hypoxia, especially when coupled with prolonged second stage and arrest of descent.

AWHONN and Menihan both state that:

“Minimal variability with recurrent decelerations indicates inability of the fetus to maintain adequate oxygenation.”

“Failure of descent in second stage with non-reassuring patterns requires operative delivery.”

Creasy & Resnik emphasize that operative vaginal birth requires:

(1) fetal head at +2 station or below,

(2) favorable position,

(3) reassuring fetal status.

Here, the fetus is OP, descent has arrested, and FHR is non-reassuring. This contraindicates vacuum extraction.

Therefore, the appropriate management under NCC competencies is cesarean birth.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

Assessment of likely fetal acid–base status is grounded in NCC-aligned principles that correlate fetal pH with fetal heart rate patterns, especially variability, presence/absence of accelerations, and type and depth of decelerations.

This tracing shows the following features:

Baseline:

The fetal heart rate baseline is approximately 140–150 bpm, within the normal 110–160 bpm range.

Variability:

Moderate variability is present—approximately 6–25 bpm amplitude.

Per NCC and NICHD definitions, moderate variability is strongly associated with normal fetal oxygenation and normal fetal pH > 7.20–7.25.

Accelerations:

There are occasional small accelerations, another strong indicator of normal fetal acid–base status.

Decelerations:

The tracing shows occasional variable decelerations, shallow and brief, recovering rapidly, typical of intermittent cord compression.

NCC references emphasize that intermittent, non-recurrent variables with moderate variability do not correlate with acidemia.

Uterine activity:

Contractions are present but not excessive, and fetal response remains reassuring.

Correlating tracing features with fetal pH (per NCC, AWHONN, Simpson, Menihan):

Moderate variability is the strongest intrapartum indicator of normal fetal pH.

The NICHD/NCC consensus repeatedly states that:

“The presence of moderate variability reliably predicts adequate fetal oxygenation and a fetal pH above the threshold associated with metabolic acidemia.”

Fetal pH below 7.15 is associated with:

Absent variability

Recurrent late decelerations

Recurrent deep variable decelerations

Prolonged bradycardia

None are present in this tracing.

Because the tracing demonstrates moderate variability, intermittent uncomplicated variables, and no recurrent late decelerations, the physiologic expectation is that the fetal pH remains normal, significantly above 7.15.

Therefore, the correct answer is: A (above 7.15).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

Tachysystole = >5 contractions in 10 minutes averaged over 30 minutes (NICHD).

However, NCC and AWHONN intervention guidelines state:

If tachysystole appears in one or two consecutive 10-minute segments, especially with Category II or III patterns, intervention must begin immediately.

Intervention includes:

Stopping/reducing oxytocin

Maternal repositioning

IV bolus

Tocolysis if needed

Why the wrong answers are wrong:

A. Waiting 30 minutes delays necessary fetal resuscitation.

C. Stage of labor does not determine when to intervene.

Correct answer: B. If tachysystole is seen for one or two 10-minute segments

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract NCC-Recommended Sources

Variability is created by beat-to-beat differences in fetal cardiac intervals due to autonomic nervous system modulation. AWHONN specifies that absent variability appears as “a near-straight line with minimal or no discernible oscillations,” which occurs when all beat intervals are identical.

Menihan notes that Doppler displays variability based on mechanical motion and will show flat, unchanging intervals when fetal autonomic modulation is suppressed, reflecting absent variability.

Bradycardia refers to a baseline <110 bpm and does not describe the uniformity of intervals. A normal baseline may still show variability; it cannot have identical beat-to-beat intervals, as this violates the definition of variability in NICHD terminology.

Simpson & Creehan state that absent variability is a significant marker of impaired fetal oxygenation or CNS depression.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract NCC-Recommended Sources

The tracing demonstrates a very rapid, highly regular baseline fetal heart rate with minimal beat-to-beat variability—characteristic of fetal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). NCC-recommended references, including AWHONN’s Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles & Practices, Menihan’s Electronic Fetal Monitoring: Concepts and Applications, Simpson & Creehan’s Perinatal Nursing, and Creasy & Resnik’s Maternal-Fetal Medicine all describe fetal SVT as a sustained tachyarrhythmia usually greater than 200 bpm, narrow-complex, and extremely regular in appearance.

AWHONN teaches that SVT appears as a “tight, rapid, uniform baseline with minimal variability.” Menihan states that “SVT may present on EFM as a nearly straight line due to the rapid, consistent rate with micro-oscillations.” This differs significantly from artifact, which appears disorganized, erratic, and inconsistent in amplitude. Additionally, “half-counting” is a Doppler misinterpretation that records half of an extremely fast fetal rate, usually resulting in a falsely lower heart rate—not the very rapid tracing shown here.

Creasy & Resnik emphasize that SVT is the most common pathological fetal arrhythmia and can lead to fetal compromise if prolonged, making accurate recognition essential. Miller’s Pocket Guide to Fetal Monitoring also identifies SVT as a pattern with a “smooth, fast rhythm lacking normal variability.”

All authoritative NCC-recommended references support that this EFM pattern is consistent with fetal SVT, not artifact or half-counting.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

The black tracing (Baby A) demonstrates:

Baseline ~170–175 bpm

Moderate variability

No recurrent decelerations

This is fetal tachycardia.

NCC physiology guidelines list common causes of fetal tachycardia:

Maternal fever / infection (chorioamnionitis)

Maternal dehydration

Maternal anxiety

Maternal hyperthyroidism

Fetal infection

Certain medications (terbutaline, illicit stimulants)

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Fetal positioning does not influence baseline heart rate.

C. Magnesium sulfate typically lowers fetal baseline and variability—it does not cause tachycardia.

Thus, the most likely etiology is infection.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract without any URL or Links

According to the NCC C-EFM 2025 Candidate Guide, Pattern Recognition and Intervention requires the candidate to classify fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns using the NICHD 2008 three-tier system, which NCC endorses across all recommended resources (AWHONN Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles and Practices, Menihan Electronic Fetal Monitoring, Simpson & Creasy, Miller’s Pocket Guide).

A Category II tracing is defined as “indeterminate” and includes any FHR pattern that is not Category I and not Category III. NCC references indicate that Category II may include:

Minimal or marked variability

Absence of accelerations after fetal stimulation

Recurrent variable decelerations with moderate variability

Prolonged decelerations lasting 2–10 minutes

Baseline tachycardia or bradycardia without absent variability

In the tracing provided:

The baseline FHR is approximately 135–145 bpm, within normal limits.

Moderate variability is not consistently present; variability is borderline minimal–moderate at times.

No significant accelerations are seen over the 25-minute evaluation period.

No recurrent late or prolonged decelerations are present.

There are occasional subtle variable-type dips, but not enough to meet criteria for Category III.

NCC-endorsed texts (such as AWHONN and Menihan) state that a tracing with minimal variability for less than 40 minutes and without recurrent decelerations is Category II, as it fails to meet the requirements for Category I (must have moderate variability and accelerations absent decelerations) and lacks the criteria for Category III (must have absent variability with recurrent late decels, recurrent variable decels, bradycardia, or sinusoidal pattern).

Therefore, this pattern is indeterminate, consistent with Category II, and requires continued surveillance and evaluation, which aligns with NCC-recommended clinical decision-making competencies.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

NCC and AWHONN auscultation standards emphasize the need to document FHR findings relative to uterine contractions, including:

The FHR between contractions (baseline)

FHR during contractions

Presence/absence of decelerations

Recovery after a contraction

Uterine activity determines whether findings are:

Baseline

Accelerations

Early/late/variable decelerations

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Fetal position — relevant for Doppler placement, not auscultation documentation.

B. Stage of labor — affects monitoring frequency but does not change how findings are documented.

Correct answer: C. Uterine activity.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (No URLs or Links):

According to the NCC C-EFM exam outline and AWHONN Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles (2022), the first step when evaluating a concerning fetal heart rate pattern is to verify uterine activity, because the fetal response is often directly associated with contraction frequency, strength, or tachysystole. AWHONN states that “the clinician must confirm maternal–fetal physiology and uterine activity by palpation when interpreting any FHR pattern, as tocodynamometry may under- or overestimate uterine pressure.” Menihan’s Electronic Fetal Monitoring further emphasizes: “Always validate the contraction pattern via maternal abdominal palpation before proceeding with additional interventions.”

The tracing shows a late-appearing deceleration pattern with uncertain contraction correlation because the external toco waveform is inadequate (flat or poorly recorded). Before determining whether the decelerations are early, late, or variable, the clinician must confirm whether contractions are present, absent, or excessive. This step is listed as a core competency under Pattern Recognition & Intervention in the NCC Candidate Guide.

Therefore, palpating for contractions is the required first intervention.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

NCC’s Professional Issues domain includes EMTALA obligations for pregnant patients. EMTALA requires that ANY individual who presents to a hospital emergency department—regardless of insurance status—must receive:

A Medical Screening Examination (MSE)

Stabilization of any identified emergency medical condition (including labor)

No transfer unless the patient requests it or the hospital cannot provide necessary stabilizing care

This patient reports contractions at 36 weeks, which qualifies as a potential emergency medical condition until ruled out by the medical screening exam.

Correct obligations per EMTALA:

She must NOT be transferred solely due to lack of insurance (option C).

She does NOT need to be admitted unless labor is confirmed (option A).

She must receive a medical screening examination and stabilization (option B).

Thus, the correct answer is B. Stabilized and receive a medical screening examination.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References (No URLs):

Interpretation of fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings in the NCC C-EFM exam follows the standardized NICHD three-tier classification, which is fully adopted in NCC’s content outline and recommended references such as AWHONN Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles & Practices, Miller’s EFM Pocket Guide, Menihan, Simpson’s Perinatal Nursing, and Creasy & Resnik.

Baseline:

The tracing demonstrates an FHR baseline around 145–150 bpm, which falls within the normal range of 110–160 bpm. NCC references define baseline as the mean FHR rounded to increments of 5 bpm over a 10-minute window.

Variability:

The strip shows minimal variability, with amplitude fluctuations approximately 0–2 bpm.

According to NCC-aligned definitions:

Moderate variability: 6–25 bpm

Minimal variability: 1–5 bpm

Absent variability: undetectable amplitude

This tracing shows minimal variability, not moderate, so it cannot be Category I.

Accelerations:

No accelerations are present. Lack of accelerations alone does not classify the tracing as Category III.

Decelerations:

There are no recurrent late decelerations, no recurrent variable decelerations, and no prolonged decelerations. Without these, and with minimal variability, the tracing does not meet Category III criteria.

Category III criteria (per NICHD/NCC):

Must include at least one of the following:

Absent variability with recurrent late decelerations

Absent variability with recurrent variable decelerations

Absent variability with bradycardia

Sinusoidal pattern

None of these are present.

Category II criteria (per NICHD/NCC):

Category II includes tracings that are not Category I or III.

Examples specifically listed include:

Minimal variability

Absent accelerations after fetal stimulation

Tachycardia

Bradycardia without absent variability

Variable or late decelerations occurring intermittently

Because this tracing shows minimal variability, a normal baseline, no accelerations, and no recurrent decelerations, it fits squarely into Category II.

Therefore, the correct classification is Category II.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

A prolonged deceleration is defined by NICHD and NCC as:

A deceleration lasting ≥2 minutes but <10 minutes

Decrease in FHR of ≥15 bpm

Can occur with or without uterine contractions

This tracing shows:

A deep drop in FHR down to ~60–70 bpm

Duration lasting several minutes

Recovery back to baseline

Moderate variability present afterward

Because variability remains present and the tracing does not show:

Absent variability

Recurrent late decelerations

Recurrent variable decelerations with absent variability

Bradycardia for ≥10 minutes

…it does not meet criteria for Category III.

It is also not bradycardia, because bradycardia requires:

Baseline <110 bpm for 10 minutes or longer

Therefore the correct interpretation is a prolonged deceleration.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

The tracing demonstrates:

Baseline: approx. 140 bpm

Variability: minimal-to-moderate (fluctuating but not consistently moderate)

Decelerations: shallow variable decelerations

Accelerations: not consistently present

According to NICHD/NCC definitions:

Category I requires ALL of the following:

Baseline 110–160

Moderate variability

No late or variable decelerations

Early decels and accelerations may be present

This tracing does not have consistently moderate variability and does have variable decelerations, so it is not Category I.

Category III requires ANY of the following:

Absent variability with recurrent late decels

Absent variability with recurrent variable decels

Absent variability with bradycardia

Sinusoidal pattern

This tracing does not show absent variability, bradycardia, or recurrent significant lates.

Category II includes:

Minimal variability

Absence of accelerations

Variable decelerations

Tracings not clearly Category I or III

This strip fits Category II exactly due to minimal variability + intermittent variable decelerations.

Thus, the correct classification is Category II.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (No URLs):

According to AWHONN Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles & Practice, Simpson & Miller, and the NCC C-EFM Content Outline, fetal heart rate categories are assigned based on baseline, variability, presence/absence of accelerations, and type of decelerations.

A Category II tracing includes any pattern that is not clearly normal (Category I) or clearly abnormal (Category III). Classic Category II features include:

• Bradycardia NOT accompanied by absent variability

• Tachycardia

• Minimal variability

• Marked variability

• Absence of accelerations after stimulation

• Recurrent variable decelerations with minimal or moderate variability

• Prolonged decelerations (≥2 min but <10 min)

In this tracing, the fetus demonstrates:

– A prolonged deceleration with subsequent recovery,

– Presence of baseline variability,

– Return toward baseline but not immediately normal.

AWHONN and Simpson state that any prolonged deceleration automatically places the tracing in Category II unless variability is absent (which would escalate it to Category III). Because variability is present, it cannot be Category III.

Therefore, by NCC standards, this tracing is Category II.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

This tracing shows recurrent late decelerations, decreased variability, and subtle baseline shifts—findings that strongly correspond to uteroplacental insufficiency. In trauma cases, NCC emphasizes that placental abruption is the most common fetal complication, caused by shearing forces separating the placenta from the uterine wall.

Key physiologic points per NCC/AWHONN/Menihan:

Maternal blunt abdominal trauma frequently leads to partial or concealed abruption.

Abruption produces decreased uteroplacental blood flow, resulting in:

Late decelerations

Minimal/absent variability

Baseline shifts or instability

Cord accident (option A) typically produces variable decelerations, not late-pattern decelerations.

Fetal trauma (option B) is extremely rare and does not produce a consistent deceleration pattern.

Thus, the physiology most consistent with this tracing and mechanism of injury is placental abruption.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

NCC and AWHONN standards state that the fetal heart tones are most clearly heard when the Doppler probe is placed over the fetal back, because:

The fetal heart transmits sound most directly through the fetal spine.

Amniotic fluid and fetal position allow the strongest conduction at the back.

During Leopold maneuvers, identification of the back guides optimal placement.

Placing the Doppler over the abdomen or chest does not provide the strongest or most reliable fetal signal.

Therefore, the correct placement is over the fetal back.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (NCC C-EFM sources: AWHONN, Miller’s Pocket Guide, Menihan, Simpson, Creasy & Resnik, 2025 Candidate Guide)

AWHONN and Menihan emphasize that most fetal dysrhythmias detected intrapartum are premature atrial contractions (PACs)—the most common benign rhythm variation. They typically appear as intermittent, irregular deflections on the fetal heart rate tracing without affecting variability or baseline.

Miller’s Pocket Guide to Fetal Monitoring states that PACs are usually transient, self-limiting, and require only observation unless accompanied by tachyarrhythmia or hemodynamic compromise. When variability is preserved and no repetitive pattern or sustained tachycardia occurs, no intrauterine resuscitation measures are indicated.

Simpson and Creehan describe that oxygen administration and fluid boluses are not recommended for benign dysrhythmias, as they do not improve fetal conduction patterns and may contribute to unnecessary interventions.

The NCC 2025 Candidate Guide specifies that correct management requires distinguishing benign arrhythmias from pathologic tachyarrhythmias, which would require escalation. In the absence of fetal compromise or maternal pathology, the appropriate action is continued observation.

Therefore, the correct management is to continue to observe.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

This tracing shows:

Baseline ~170–175 bpm → fetal tachycardia

Minimal variability

No contractions of significance

Maternal treatment with magnesium sulfate, which typically decreases baseline and variability—not increase it

NCC and AWHONN physiology guidelines emphasize that fetal tachycardia is most commonly associated with maternal infection, including chorioamnionitis, especially in preterm labor.

Magnesium sulfate does not cause tachycardia; it generally causes:

↓ baseline

↓ variability

Thus, fetal tachycardia + minimal variability in a preterm patient strongly suggests maternal infection, requiring evaluation for chorioamnionitis.

Why the wrong answers are incorrect:

A. Acetaminophen → used after confirming fever, not before evaluating the cause.

B. Discontinuing magnesium → magnesium sulfate does not cause tachycardia; discontinuing it removes fetal neuroprotection.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

In NCC C-EFM interpretation, classification of a fetal heart tracing is based on NICHD’s three-tier system: Category I, II, and III. Category III represents an abnormal tracing requiring immediate evaluation and prompt intervention.

Key findings in this tracing:

Baseline:Baseline is approximately 140 bpm, within the normal range (110–160 bpm).Baseline alone does not determine category.

Variability:The tracing shows absent variability:

No beat-to-beat oscillations

Flat, minimal fluctuationNICHD and NCC define absent variability as amplitude range undetectable.

Accelerations:No accelerations are present.

Decelerations:The strip does not show decelerations or bradycardia.However, absent variability alone with no accelerations for 20 minutes is highly concerning.

Category Classification per NICHD/NCC:

Category III criteria include ANY of the following:

Absent variability with recurrent late decelerations

Absent variability with recurrent variable decelerations

Absent variability with bradycardia

Sinusoidal pattern

Also recognized as Category III:

Persistent absent variability lasting ≥20 minutes with no accelerations, which is strongly suggestive of fetal acidemia when sustained.

This tracing shows:

Absent variability (flat line)

No accelerations

Persisting over an extended period

Under NCC and AWHONN guidance:

A persistently flat tracing must be classified as Category III unless proven otherwise (e.g., fetal sleep, maternal medications), and it requires immediate intrauterine resuscitation and evaluation for potential expedited delivery.

Why Category I is NOT correct:

Category I requires:

Moderate variability

No late or variable decelerationsThis tracing does not have moderate variability.

Why Category II is NOT correct:

Category II includes minimal variability, marked variability, intermittent variables/lates, absence of accelerations after stimulation.

This tracing is worse than Category II because variability is absent, not minimal.

Thus, the tracing fits Category III.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract NCC-Recommended Sources

Sentinel events are defined by the Joint Commission as unexpected occurrences involving death, serious physical or psychological injury, or the risk thereof, and they require immediate investigation, root-cause analysis, and institutional response. They do not require confirmed malpractice or negligence.

AWHONN’s perinatal safety guidelines and NCC’s Professional Issues domain specify that sentinel events trigger mandatory reporting, analysis, system review, and corrective action plans. Simpson & Creehan emphasize that they are addressed through standardized safety processes, including interdisciplinary review.

Miller’s Pocket Guide notes that sentinel events are “events that require immediate investigation to prevent recurrence,” aligning with answer choice B.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (No URLs):

According to AWHONN’s Fetal Assessment Text, Simpson & Miller, and Menihan, vibroacoustic stimulation is utilized during NSTs to elicit fetal accelerations, thereby minimizing testing time.

NCC-referenced sources describe VAS as:

• A method that awakens the fetus,

• Stimulates the fetal auditory system,

• Produces reactive accelerations in a neurologically intact fetus,

• Dramatically shortens NST duration, especially when the fetus is in a sleep cycle.

VAS does NOT measure amniotic fluid, nor does it have any effect on uterine activity (therefore cannot treat tachysystole).

The only correct purpose supported by NCC-cited literature is that VAS shortens the duration of the NST, making Option C correct.