BCS BAPv5 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The documentation defines Critical Success Factors (CSFs) as the few key areas where “things must go right” for the business to flourish and for managerial goals to be attained. The key points are that CSFs are few, they are key, and they are musts—not just “nice-to-have” activities.

Given the objectives, CSFs should be chosen that directly drive market share growth, customer loyalty, and expansion into new markets. Option A aligns strongly to “increase market share in key demographics” because pricing competitiveness is often a critical lever in apparel retail: if pricing drifts out of line with competitor positioning or customer value expectations, share and loyalty can rapidly erode. A CSF framed around continuously monitoring competitor pricing and responding in a controlled way supports both market share and profitability—key for sustained growth.

Option D aligns strongly to “expand product lines and reach new markets.” Establishing new distribution channels (marketplaces, stores, partnerships) is frequently a make-or-break capability for expansion: without the right channels, new product lines won’t reach target segments effectively. That makes it a credible “must go right” area.

Option E (follower count) is not necessarily critical—engagement can matter, but “follower count must remain high” is too narrow and can be a vanity metric. Options B and C may be important hygiene or internal factors, but they are not as directly tied to the stated objectives as A and D.

An enabling activity is an activity that supports or facilitates another activity within an organisation or project. It helps to ensure that another activity can be performed or delivered effectively and efficiently. Therefore, option B is the correct answer, as check adherence to regulation is an enabling activity that supports provide insolvency services, which is the primary doing activity of a BAM reflecting DeanLegal’s business perspective. Check adherence to regulation is an enabling activity, as it involves verifying that the insolvency services provided by DeanLegal comply with the rules and standards set by the Federation of Insolvency Practitioners (FIP). It helps to ensure that DeanLegal can perform its primary doing activity legally and ethically. Option A is not a correct answer, as provide comprehensive support to customers is not an enabling activity that supports provide insolvency services, but another doing activity within DeanLegal’s business perspective. Provide comprehensive support to customers is a doing activity, as it involves delivering value and satisfaction to customers who use DeanLegal’s insolvency services. It helps to achieve DeanLegal’s objectives and outcomes. Option C is not a correct answer, as extend range of services is not an enabling activity that supports provide insolvency services, but a potential change or improvement within DeanLegal’s business perspective. Extend range of services is a change or improvement, as it involves introducing new types of services, such as advice in funding the purchase of capital assets, that DeanLegal may offer to its customers in addition to its insolvency services. It helps to enhance DeanLegal’s performance and potential. Option D is not a correct answer, as recruit experienced negotiators is not an enabling activity that supports provide insolvency services, but a resource audit within DeanLegal’s business perspective. Recruit experienced negotiators is a resource audit, as it involves identifying and evaluating the human resources that DeanLegal has or needs to perform its insolvency services. It helps to assess the availability and quality of DeanLegal’s staff.

The business analysis guidance makes it clear that a business case is not a “one-and-done” document that stops being useful at implementation. Instead, it is revisited at multiple decision gates through the lifecycle, including points after development estimates are known, before deployment, and later during operation when benefits realisation is checked. This directly contradicts statement A, because the business case remains relevant beyond implementation to confirm assumptions and verify whether expected benefits were actually achieved.

Statement B is also incorrect. The guidance explicitly states that the “do nothing / maintain the status quo” option should always be considered and will usually appear in the business case. It may sometimes be rejected due to unacceptable consequences, but it should still be included so decision-makers understand the risks of inaction.

Statement C is correct because the business case should consider both tangible and intangible benefits. The documentation explains that many benefits (for example improved customer satisfaction or staff morale) can be intangible, meaning they cannot be credibly valued in advance. While organisations vary in how they treat intangibles, the framework recognises them as legitimate benefits (with the caution not to overstate them or assign “spurious” values).