CIMA F3 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

 C – More cash = able to react quickly to unexpected investment opportunities.

 D – Cash buffer reduces the likelihood of liquidity problems in a downturn.

 E – If excess cash were returned, markets might read it as “no good growth opportunities”, so retaining avoids that negative signal.

Competition authorities focus primarily on market structure and competition, not on whether the bid is generous or on employment promises. Their concern is: Will this merger substantially lessen competition?

In food retailing, a key issue is local market concentration – for example, a single group owning too many supermarkets in particular towns or regions. A classic remedy is for the bidder to divest overlapping outlets so that effective competition remains.

B. Agreeing to dispose of specified outlets which overlap geographically directly addresses the competition authority’s main concern and is the standard structural remedy used in practice.

A (more cash) is irrelevant to competition issues.

C (job guarantees) is mainly a political/employment concern, not an antitrust one.

D (promise to pass on cost savings) is difficult to monitor and enforce and is normally viewed as less credible than structural remedies.

So the action most likely to persuade the competition authorities is B.

Current revenue = $300m at $2.00/kWh → units = 300/2 = 150m kWh

New price cap = $1.50; demand rises 10% → units = 150m × 1.10 = 165m kWh

New revenue = 165m × $1.50 = $247.5m

Costs remain $200m → new profit = 247.5 − 200 = $47.5m profit

✅ Answer: A. $47.5 million profit