Free and Premium Versa Networks VNX301 Dumps Questions Answers

The correct answers are A and C . If the onboarding VPN tunnel from the branch device to the Controller is up, the branch has reached at least the initial staging/control connectivity stage. Versa troubleshooting documentation explains that after a branch establishes IPsec connectivity to the Controller, the Controller sends a branch-connect notification to Versa Director. In response, Director pushes staging configuration and continues the onboarding lifecycle. If the expected later notification is not seen, the branch has not completed staging and further onboarding/debug steps are required.

The Tasks list in Versa Director is useful because device deployment and onboarding actions are executed as Director tasks. If template commit, workflow deployment, device claiming, or configuration push fails, the task output can show the error. The Unknown Devices dashboard is also relevant because a device that reaches the Controller but cannot be matched or fully associated with an expected workflow/appliance record may appear as an unknown device awaiting administrative review. The Monitor dashboard is not the best choice because the device is missing from the Appliances list and has not completed onboarding. Resource Pool is related to connector resources, not branch onboarding completion.

The correct answers are A and D . Versa stateful firewall service includes classic firewall functions that track sessions and enforce traffic policy, and it can work with DoS policy enforcement. Versa’s CLI guide includes Configuring DoS policies under the security configuration area, where DoS rules can match on source, destination, services, applications, URL category, IP version, DSCP, TTL, EtherType, and other packet or session attributes, and can then apply aggregate or classified DoS profiles. This validates DoS protection as a stateful firewall/security service capability.

Application-Level Gateways, or ALGs , are also associated with stateful firewall/NAT behavior because they inspect and assist protocol handling for applications that embed addressing or dynamic port information inside the payload or control channel. This is part of traditional stateful firewall service behavior rather than UTM content inspection.

The correct answers are A, B, and E . Versa Operating System, or VOS , is the software platform used for Versa SD-WAN branch and headend functions. Versa troubleshooting documentation explicitly refers to common runtime state across SD-WAN Controller, branch, and hub devices , confirming that VOS is used for Controller and branch-style SD-WAN roles. Versa monitoring documentation also lists SD-WAN branches, SD-WAN Controller nodes, SD-WAN hubs, vCPEs, and uCPEs as assets that are monitored and managed in Versa Director, which aligns with VOS being used as a branch/edge and controller platform.

VOS can also act as a uCPE platform . Versa documentation includes procedures to configure uCPE on a VOS device, showing that VOS can host or support uCPE deployment use cases.

The originally provided answer A, C, D is not correct. A Log Collector or log forwarder function belongs to the Versa Analytics architecture, not the VOS branch role; Versa’s design guide states that the log forwarder is part of the Versa Analytics node or can run as a standalone log-forwarder server. A Zookeeper arbiter is also not a standard VOS SD-WAN device role in this context.

The correct answer is A . In Versa SD-WAN application steering, SaaS or cloud-path selection can use monitoring and DNS-based behavior to determine the best path for an application. For real-time applications such as voice, session stability is often more important than aggressively moving active flows after every path-score change. Session pinning to DNS path is the forwarding-profile behavior that keeps a session associated with the path selected when the DNS/application path decision was made.

This matters because voice and collaboration applications can be sensitive to path changes, packet reordering, and jitter. Pinning prevents active sessions from being unnecessarily moved mid-flow as SaaS monitoring scores change, while still allowing new sessions to take advantage of newer path decisions.

Packet striping is used to distribute packets across multiple circuits and can create reordering concerns for some applications. Symmetric forwarding controls reverse-path behavior rather than DNS-based session stability. Random packet drop is a DoS mitigation action, not a SaaS path-selection feature. Therefore, the best answer is Session pinning to DNS path.

The correct answer is A . The exhibit shows that the IPsec VPN is being configured with Tunnel Routing Instance: XIAN-Control-VR . However, the question states that the tunnel is toward a non-SD-WAN site over the INET-Transport-VR . For a site-to-site IPsec tunnel, the tunnel routing instance must match the routing instance used to reach the peer public IP address. In this case, the remote non-SD-WAN peer is 10.1.1.1 , and the intended underlay transport is INET-Transport-VR , not the Control VR.

Versa troubleshooting documentation explains that routing instances are used to define where traffic is sourced and forwarded. For example, configuration examples select routing instances when enabling services or initiating tests, and traffic must use the correct WAN or transport routing instance to reach the remote endpoint. Versa branch troubleshooting also emphasizes that after transport connectivity is available, the branch establishes IKE-based IPsec connectivity; if that connectivity fails, the IPsec-related interface remains down.

Changing the routing instance to global would not be correct because the intended path is specifically INET-Transport-VR. A higher precedence value is not required to establish the tunnel. The policy selector shown already defines local-to-remote interesting traffic, and the key failure is the incorrect tunnel routing instance.

The correct answer is A . Versa link-bandwidth troubleshooting documentation explains that a VOS device can be configured as a Versa speed-test client, a Versa speed-test server, or both simultaneously. After the server is configured, the client starts the test by initiating a TCP-based connection toward the speed-test server. The server listens on port 5201 . The documentation includes an explicit note that if the VOS device is behind a firewall, port 5201 must be open .

This is different from the SD-WAN overlay data path, which commonly uses UDP-based transport encapsulation, and different from internet speed-test traffic, which uses other ports depending on the specific test type. In this scenario, the question states that a Versa speed-test server was configured, so the relevant requirement is TCP 5201 reachability from the client to the server.

TCP 443 may be used for management or web access, UDP 4790 is associated with SD-WAN transport encapsulation, and UDP 53 is DNS. None of those replace TCP 5201 for Versa speed-test server operation.

The correct answers are A and C . Versa supports upgrading deployed VOS branch devices either directly on the VOS appliance or centrally through Versa Director. The Director-based method is performed from the Administration > Appliances area: Versa documentation says to select one or more Controller nodes or VOS devices, click the Upgrade Selected Appliances icon, choose the software image package, and proceed with the appliance upgrade. The same upgrade procedure is referenced for remaining VOS branch devices, including the option to upgrade branches individually or all at once.

A CLI-based upgrade using a software .bin package is also a valid operational method when the image is copied to the device and installed locally, particularly for controlled or recovery-style maintenance. Option B is not the best answer for already deployed branch upgrades because the Preferred Software Version field applies to zero-touch provisioning; Versa states that during ZTP, Director upgrades a branch to the preferred version if applicable. That setting influences onboarding behavior, not the normal upgrade workflow for already deployed branches. Option D is incorrect because System > Director Upgrade is used to upgrade the Versa Director node itself, not VOS branch appliances.

The correct answers are A, B, and E . Versa Director supports multiple notification and event-publishing mechanisms. For email-style system and alarm notifications, Versa Director supports SMTP configuration. The Director documentation lists Configure SMTP Notifications and explains that email templates require SMTP notifications to send test emails or operational messages.

Versa Director also supports webhook notifications. The Director GUI overview states that Notification Configuration includes webhook-based notifications for alarms, and the Director documentation includes a dedicated workflow for configuring webhook notifications for alarms.

Kafka is also a supported event-notification method. Versa’s Kafka Notifications documentation states that Versa Director can publish event notifications to an Apache Kafka server when events occur on a Director node or a VOS device. It also lists notification topics for device events, Director events, Director task notifications, and object-change event notifications.

MMS is not a Versa Director system event notification method. SMS can be configured for text messaging in some notification contexts, but for the three methods listed for system event notifications in this answer set, the verified options are SMTP, Webhook, and Kafka.

The correct answer is B . The exhibit shows the branch interface summary in Versa Director with a Live Data column. To populate real-time bandwidth graphs for WAN circuits, the administrator must select Live Data for the WAN interfaces that need to be monitored. Versa monitoring documentation states that, from a Director node, you can monitor VOS devices and organizations, and that Director, together with Versa Analytics, can poll VOS devices in real time to understand what is happening on the devices. This real-time information can be displayed to assist with troubleshooting.

Because the question asks for the current bandwidth of each WAN circuit, historical analytics alone is not sufficient. The dashboard must poll live statistics from the selected WAN circuits. In the exhibit, not all WAN interfaces appear to have Live Data selected; therefore, the graph is not populated for all circuits. Refreshing the page does not enable polling and will not solve the missing data condition. Selecting only MPLS would populate only the MPLS circuit, not all WAN circuits. Unselecting and reselecting only the INET circuit would affect only that one interface. Therefore, Live Data must be selected for all WAN circuits whose current bandwidth should be displayed.

The correct answer is A . Versa monitoring documentation states that when an administrator selects a provider organization in Director and opens the Summary tab, the screen displays several panes. The Asset Inventory pane displays the number of tenants, SD-WAN branches, SD-WAN Controller nodes, vCPEs, SD-WAN hubs, uCPEs, Director nodes, and Analytics nodes in the organization.

This pane is useful for quickly validating the managed estate and confirming whether expected infrastructure objects exist under the provider organization. It also provides a Details button to display asset information in tabular format, which can help during audits or operational checks.

Package Information shows software package details for the selected node, not organization-wide inventory. Uptime shows how long a node and its software have been running. High Availability shows Director HA information. These panes are useful, but they do not provide the organization-level asset count requested in the question.

The correct answer is A . Versa CGNAT troubleshooting documentation provides commands to inspect CGNAT state inside the vsmd daemon. To view summary information about configured tenants, the document instructs administrators to issue show cgnat tenants . The sample output shows each tenant ID and counters such as the number of configured rules, pools, DS-Lite service chains, 6RD service chains, static NAT entries, subscribers, endpoint-independent mapping entries, endpoint-independent filtering entries, and softwires.

This command is especially useful when CGNAT configuration appears correct in Director but translation is not happening, because it confirms whether the runtime dataplane process actually has the tenant CGNAT state.

show interfaces brief shows interface status and IP addressing. show alarms shows event notifications, and show system uptime shows how long the system has been running. These are useful operational commands but do not show CGNAT tenant programming inside vsmd.

The correct answers are C and D . Versa templates are designed to reuse common configuration while still allowing per-device customization. Template variables allow the same template to be deployed to multiple appliances while using device-specific values such as addresses, VLAN IDs, DHCP information, or other bind-data values. Versa documentation for deploying templates describes assigning values to variables contained in a main template that are specific to the device. This makes option C correct.

Option D is also correct because Versa workflows are used to create templates for VOS device configuration. Versa documentation states that workflows are used to create templates to configure VOS devices, and also to create templates for application steering, spoke groups, and service chains.

Option A is not correct in the normal Versa Director onboarding model because a group of devices is associated with one staging template and one post-staging template, rather than multiple device templates being stacked per appliance. Option B is also incorrect because service templates are optional reusable service-specific fragments. Versa documentation states that service templates can be used by multiple device templates and device groups, but it does not require every appliance to have one.

The correct answer is B . Versa documentation describes checking for asymmetrical SD-WAN paths when troubleshooting bandwidth and throughput issues. It gives the example of traffic being transmitted on one transport network and returning on another transport network that has different bandwidth. To check whether traffic is traversing an asymmetrical SD-WAN path, Versa recommends using show orgs org organization-name sessions sdwan brief.

In that output, the key fields are RX WAN CKT and TX WAN CKT . If the SD-WAN paths are symmetrical, the circuits shown in the RX and TX WAN circuit fields must be the same on the local and remote sites. If traffic goes out over Internet and returns over MPLS, throughput may differ depending on the bandwidth and quality of each circuit.

Source and destination zones are security-policy concepts, while BGP local preference and MED are routing attributes. Tenant ID and VSN ID identify context, but they do not directly prove directional WAN-circuit asymmetry.

The correct answer is A . In Versa SD-WAN forwarding profiles, next-hop priorities define which circuits are preferred. When the Load Balance next-hop selection method is used and two circuits share the same priority, sessions can be distributed across those equal-priority paths as long as they are usable and SLA-compliant. A lower priority number represents a more preferred group than a higher priority number. Therefore, two circuits with priority 1 are preferred over LTE with priority 2 .

In this scenario, both internet circuits are healthy and both have priority 1. The VOS device should load-balance sessions across those two circuits. LTE remains available as a lower-priority backup path and would normally be considered only when the preferred internet circuits are unavailable, fail path checks, or no longer meet the applicable policy conditions.

Traffic is not replicated because replication is a separate feature and not implied by Load Balance. The branch does not drop traffic while valid paths exist. LTE is not preferred merely because its priority number is higher; in path selection, priority 1 is preferred over priority 2.

In the exhibit, the Add Associate Interface/Network window has Interface selected, and the interface name is set to vni-0/0 . The DSCP rewrite option is not available because rewrite behavior is intended to be applied at the network association level for the WAN network, not directly while associating only the physical/logical interface. For WAN-facing CoS, the scheduler and shaping parameters can be attached to an interface, but DSCP rewrite policies are applied to remark traffic as it exits through a network context.

Versa SD-WAN design documentation explains that QoS rewrite rules rewrite packet QoS attributes as packets leave the VOS device, and that rewrite rules can modify IEEE 802.1p bits, IPv4 TOS/DSCP bits, and IPv6 traffic class bits. It also explains that a rewrite policy is commonly applied on a WAN network to remark traffic based on the forwarding class and loss priority assigned by QoS or App QoS policies. In the design example, Versa explicitly describes applying a QoS propagation or rewrite policy on the MPLS WAN network to remark traffic to a DSCP value. Therefore, the issue is the association type: it is set to Interface, not Network.

The correct answer is LOCAL_PREF . In BGP, the Local Preference attribute is used inside an autonomous system to influence which exit path is preferred for outbound traffic. In this scenario, the Versa Secure SD-WAN CPE receives routes from two upstream service providers, SP1 and SP2. To prefer routes learned from AS 64515 over routes learned from AS 64519, you would apply a BGP import or route policy that assigns a higher local preference to routes received from SP1. Versa SD-WAN design guidance shows this exact routing concept: an import policy can manipulate the Local-Pref attribute to prefer one advertised route path over another. The Versa output examples also display “Local Preference” as a BGP route attribute used in route selection.

MULTI_EXIT_DISC, or MED, is generally used to influence how a neighboring AS enters your AS, not how your CPE prefers routes learned from different upstreams. ORIGIN is part of BGP best-path selection but is not normally the administrative tool used to prefer one provider. NEXT_HOP identifies the next-hop address and does not directly define route preference.

The correct answer is A . Versa CGNAT troubleshooting documentation shows the command show cgnat acl info < tenant-id > for viewing CGNAT access lists used for traffic matching. The example output includes columns such as ACL handle , RuleId , Category , Precedence , VRF , Source IP , and Destination IP . It also shows tenant ID and total filters.

This command is useful when a CGNAT rule exists in configuration but sessions are not being translated. By checking the ACL output, the administrator can confirm whether the correct source prefix, destination prefix, VRF, and rule precedence are actually programmed in the dataplane. If the wrong VRF or subnet is shown, the rule may never match the intended traffic.

System uptime and CPU usage are operational health indicators. SLA metrics are SD-WAN path-quality values. BGP AS path and local preference are routing attributes. None of these directly show CGNAT access-list match programming.

The correct answer is B . The exhibit shows the OSPF neighbor in the exst state, which means Exchange Start . Versa documentation lists the OSPF neighbor state codes and identifies exst as “exchange start,” followed by exchange, loading, and full. In normal OSPF adjacency formation, neighbors progress through initialization and two-way communication before they negotiate database exchange. If the neighbor becomes stuck in ExStart or Exchange, a common and highly probable cause is an MTU mismatch between the two OSPF peers. During database description packet negotiation, the peers must agree on parameters that allow LSDB exchange; an MTU mismatch can prevent the adjacency from advancing to Full.

Option A is less likely because an area mismatch usually prevents the neighbor relationship from forming correctly rather than leaving it stuck in ExStart. Option C is also incorrect because the neighbor has already progressed beyond early states, which indicates that bidirectional communication has occurred. Option D is not the best answer because dropping OSPF multicast 224.0.0.5 would typically prevent discovery or keep the adjacency in an earlier state, not specifically in ExStart. Therefore, the probable cause is an interface MTU mismatch.