Versa Networks VNX301 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The correct answers are C and D . Versa templates are designed to reuse common configuration while still allowing per-device customization. Template variables allow the same template to be deployed to multiple appliances while using device-specific values such as addresses, VLAN IDs, DHCP information, or other bind-data values. Versa documentation for deploying templates describes assigning values to variables contained in a main template that are specific to the device. This makes option C correct.

Option D is also correct because Versa workflows are used to create templates for VOS device configuration. Versa documentation states that workflows are used to create templates to configure VOS devices, and also to create templates for application steering, spoke groups, and service chains.

Option A is not correct in the normal Versa Director onboarding model because a group of devices is associated with one staging template and one post-staging template, rather than multiple device templates being stacked per appliance. Option B is also incorrect because service templates are optional reusable service-specific fragments. Versa documentation states that service templates can be used by multiple device templates and device groups, but it does not require every appliance to have one.

The correct answer is B . The exhibit shows the OSPF neighbor in the exst state, which means Exchange Start . Versa documentation lists the OSPF neighbor state codes and identifies exst as “exchange start,” followed by exchange, loading, and full. In normal OSPF adjacency formation, neighbors progress through initialization and two-way communication before they negotiate database exchange. If the neighbor becomes stuck in ExStart or Exchange, a common and highly probable cause is an MTU mismatch between the two OSPF peers. During database description packet negotiation, the peers must agree on parameters that allow LSDB exchange; an MTU mismatch can prevent the adjacency from advancing to Full.

Option A is less likely because an area mismatch usually prevents the neighbor relationship from forming correctly rather than leaving it stuck in ExStart. Option C is also incorrect because the neighbor has already progressed beyond early states, which indicates that bidirectional communication has occurred. Option D is not the best answer because dropping OSPF multicast 224.0.0.5 would typically prevent discovery or keep the adjacency in an earlier state, not specifically in ExStart. Therefore, the probable cause is an interface MTU mismatch.

The correct answer is B . Versa documentation describes checking for asymmetrical SD-WAN paths when troubleshooting bandwidth and throughput issues. It gives the example of traffic being transmitted on one transport network and returning on another transport network that has different bandwidth. To check whether traffic is traversing an asymmetrical SD-WAN path, Versa recommends using show orgs org organization-name sessions sdwan brief.

In that output, the key fields are RX WAN CKT and TX WAN CKT . If the SD-WAN paths are symmetrical, the circuits shown in the RX and TX WAN circuit fields must be the same on the local and remote sites. If traffic goes out over Internet and returns over MPLS, throughput may differ depending on the bandwidth and quality of each circuit.

Source and destination zones are security-policy concepts, while BGP local preference and MED are routing attributes. Tenant ID and VSN ID identify context, but they do not directly prove directional WAN-circuit asymmetry.