Selected Professional-Cloud-Security-Engineer Google Cloud Certified Questions Answers

Objective: Quickly recover a deleted service account used for data transfers.

Solution: Use the undelete command available in the gcloud command-line tool to recover the service account.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Cloud Shell in the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Run the following command to list the deleted service accounts:

gcloud iam service-accounts list --filter="deleted: true"

Step 3: Identify the name and ID of the deleted service account.

Step 4: Use the undelete command to recover the service account:

gcloud iam service-accounts undelete [SERVICE_ACCOUNT_ID]

Step 5: Verify that the service account has been restored and reassign any necessary permissions.

By using the undelete command, you can quickly restore the service account and resume application functionality without compromising security.

The problem states that Google Cloud applications need to access external web services and requires the ability to monitor, control, and log this access.

Monitoring, Controlling, and Logging external web access: This specifically points to a proxy solution, which can intercept, inspect, and log HTTP/S traffic.

Secure Web Proxy (SWP): Google Cloud's Secure Web Proxy is designed for exactly this use case. It acts as an explicit forward proxy for HTTP(S) traffic, allowing organizations to implement granular access controls, inspect traffic for security threats, and log all outbound web requests from their Google Cloud environment.Extract Reference: "Secure Web Proxy is a managed service that lets you deploy and manage an explicit forward proxy to protect your organization's internal resources from web-based threats and to control access to external web applications." and "With Secure Web Proxy, you can: Enforce granular access policies based on different attributes, Log all HTTP(S) requests that are handled by the proxy, and Monitor web traffic for threats." (Google Cloud documentation:

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Configure VPC firewall rules to allow the services to access the IP addresses of required external web services: VPC firewall rules operate at Layer 4 (TCP/UDP) and Layer 3 (IP). While they can allow or deny traffic to specific IP addresses and ports, they cannot monitor, control, or log HTTP/S requests at the application layer. They don't provide granular control over which web services are accessed or inspect the content of the requests.

C. Configure Google Cloud Armor to monitor and protect your applications by checking incoming traffic patterns for attack patterns: Google Cloud Armor is primarily a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection and Web Application Firewall (WAF) service. It focuses on protecting applications from incoming threats (ingress traffic), not controlling and logging outgoing access to external web services.

D. Set up a Cloud NAT instance to allow egress traffic from your VPC: Cloud NAT allows instances without external IP addresses to connect to the internet. While it enables egress, it does not provide monitoring, control, or logging capabilities for specific web services at the application layer. It's a network address translation service, not an application-layer proxy.

Therefore, setting up a Secure Web Proxy is the most appropriate solution to meet the requirements of monitoring, controlling, and logging access to external web services from Google Cloud applications.

To establish a reliable, cloud-native, and scalable process for updating nodes in your GKE clusters, configuring node auto-upgrades within designated maintenance windows is the most effective approach.​

Option A: Migrating to a self-managed Kubernetes environment would increase operational overhead and complexity, as your team would be responsible for managing the entire infrastructure, including patching and updates. This contradicts the goal of adopting a cloud-first strategy and does not inherently provide a more reliable update process.​

Option B: Developing custom scripts for patch management introduces potential risks and maintenance burdens. Ensuring the reliability, security, and scalability of such scripts can be challenging, and this approach may not align with best practices for managing GKE environments.​

Option C: Scheduling daily reboots does not guarantee that nodes will apply the latest patches or updates. Without a mechanism to manage and apply updates, reboots alone are insufficient to maintain node security and compliance.​

Option D: Configuring node auto-upgrades ensures that GKE automatically keeps your nodes up-to-date with the latest stable versions, reducing the risk of missed critical patches. By setting maintenance windows, you can control when these upgrades occur, minimizing disruptions to your workloads. This approach leverages GKE's managed services to maintain security and compliance efficiently.​

Therefore, Option D is the optimal solution, as it aligns with a cloud-first strategy and leverages GKE's native capabilities to automate and schedule node updates effectively.​

The problem states that the organization is using Model Garden and needs to ensure users can only access approved models. This implies a need for a central, enforceable control mechanism.

Organization Policies and Constraints: Google Cloud Organization Policy Service allows administrators to centrally control resources across an organization. Constraints are specific types of restrictions that can be applied. For AI Platform (which includes Vertex AI and Model Garden), there are specific constraints designed to control model usage.

vertexai.allowedModels Constraint: This specific organization policy constraint is designed precisely to restrict which models can be used within a given organization, folder, or project. It provides a centralized way to define a list of approved models that users are allowed to access.Extract Reference: "The vertexai.allowedModels constraint allows you to specify a list of model URIs that are allowed to be used within the resource hierarchy." and "This constraint helps organizations enforce compliance and control which models are consumed by their users." (Google Cloud documentation, typically found under Organization Policy Service constraints for Vertex AI or AI Platform)

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Configure IAM permissions on individual Model Garden to restrict access to specific models: IAM (Identity and Access Management) typically grants permissions at a broader resource level (e.g., project, dataset, model resource). While you can control who can manage models, directly restricting access to specific models within Model Garden for consumption via IAM roles on individual models is not the primary mechanism for enforcing a list of approved models across an organization in a preventative way. Organization policies are designed for this kind of broad, preventative control.

B. Regularly audit user activity logs in Vertex AI to identify and revoke access to unapproved models: Auditing logs is a reactive measure. While important for monitoring and detecting violations, it does not prevent users from accessing unapproved models in the first place. The requirement is to ensure they can only access approved models, implying a proactive control.

C. Train custom models within your Vertex AI project and restrict user access to these models: This is about managing access to custom-trained models, not about controlling access to the collection of models in Model Garden, which often includes pre-trained or publicly available models that need to be whitelisted. It doesn't address the requirement of ensuring users only access approved models from the broader Model Garden collection.

Therefore, implementing an organization policy with the vertexai.allowedModels constraint is the most effective and Google-recommended way to centrally ensure that users can only access approved models within an organization using Model Garden.