Pearson F5CAB1 New Attempt

Provisioning determines:

Which BIG-IP modules are enabled (LTM, ASM, APM, AFM, DNS, etc.)

Their provisioning levels (None, Minimal, Nominal, Dedicated)

Two accurate ways to view provisioning settings are:

A. GUI — System → Resource Provisioning → Module Allocation

This is the primary GUI screen showing:

All modules

Their provisioning level

System resource distribution impact

Administrators commonly use this page to confirm or change module provisioning.

D. TMSH — list /sys provision

This tmsh command displays each module and its provisioning level:

sys provision ltm { level nominal }

sys provision asm { level none }

This is the authoritative CLI method for checking module provisioning configurations.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. show /sys provision

Shows runtime information but not the actual configuration levels .

list is the correct command for configuration details.

C. Statistics → Module Statistics

Shows performance statistics, NOT provisioning status.

Therefore, the correct responses are A and D .

For BIG-IP high-availability (HA) pairs, F5’s recommended upgrade workflow prioritizes service continuity , predictable failover , and minimal downtime . The established best-practice sequence is:

Upgrade the standby unit first

Because the standby device is not passing traffic, upgrading and rebooting it does not impact production.

Boot the standby unit into the newly installed version

Once online, the administrator verifies basic health, device sync status, cluster communication, and module functionality.

Perform a controlled failover to the upgraded unit

Traffic shifts to the newly upgraded device, allowing validation of the configuration and operational behavior under real traffic loads.

Upgrade the second device (now standby)

The previously active device becomes standby after failover, allowing it to be safely upgraded and rebooted without interruption.

This phased approach ensures only one device is unavailable at a time, allowing continuous traffic flow throughout the upgrade process.

Why the Correct Answer is C

Option C exactly matches F5’s documented production-safe upgrade method:

Upgrade the standby node first

Reboot into new image

Failover to upgraded device

Validate

Upgrade the remaining (now-standby) device

This procedure minimizes risk and traffic disruption.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Upgrade the active node first

Upgrading the active device requires removing it from service and failing over abruptly. This is not recommended and increases service disruption risk.

B. Resetting device trust

Resetting trust is unnecessary and can disrupt configuration sync, peer communication, and cluster operation. It is not part of any standard upgrade workflow.

D. Upgrading and rebooting both nodes simultaneously

This would cause total outage , because both HA members would be unavailable at the same time.

When you choose Automatic as the activation method in the License › Re-activate screen, the BIG-IP device itself contacts F5’s license activation service over the Internet.

For successful automatic activation:

The BIG-IP must have outbound network connectivity (typically via the management interface).

DNS resolution and routing must allow it to reach the F5 license activation host (the one shown in option D).

The device sends its dossier and registration key to that service and receives an updated license file in return, which is then installed automatically.

The other hostnames in the options are not used by BIG-IP for license activation, so they cannot be correct in the context of Automatic Activation .

From the exhibit, the administrator performs the following actions:

Displays the current SSH allow configuration:

tmsh list sys sshd allow

allow { ALL }

Replaces the existing SSH allow list with a specific subnet:

tmsh modify sys sshd allow replace-all-with { 10.0.0.0/24 }

Confirms the updated configuration:

tmsh list sys sshd allow

allow { 10.0.0.0/24 }

This configuration restricts SSH access to only hosts that fall within the 10.0.0.0/24 network.

Evaluation of the options

A. 10.0.0.100

This address is within the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet and is a valid host address, so SSH access is permitted.

B. 10.0.0.254

This address is also within the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet and is a valid host address, so SSH access is permitted.

C. 10.0.0.256

This is not a valid IP address because an IPv4 octet cannot exceed 255.

D. 100.0.1.10

This address is outside the configured 10.0.0.0/24 subnet and will not be allowed.

E. 100.0.0.10

This address is also outside the configured subnet and will not be allowed.