PDF LLQP Study Guide

Upon maturity,the new guarantee becomes the current market value, andthe new maturity date is based on contract terms, often depending on the ageof the client or a specific reset term.

Exact Extract:

"When a segregated fund contract matures, the new guarantee is based on the current market value, and a new maturity date is set according to the client’s age or the insurer’s terms."

(Reference:Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.1.2 Growth Secured by Reset【45:0†Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED.pdf**)

Thematurity guaranteein a segregated fund protects a minimum portion (often 75% or 100%) of the initial investment at maturity, even if high-risk investments underperform. This allows Miles to take risks while having downside protection.

Exact Extract:

"The maturity guarantee protects a minimum portion of the original investment at contract maturity date, even if the underlying investment loses value."

(Reference:Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.1.1.1 Maturity Guarantee​)

Upon retirement, funds from a Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (DPSP) can be transferred on a tax-deferred basis to certain registered accounts, such as a Locked-In Retirement Account (LIRA). This option allows Aadi to defer taxes while preserving the funds for future retirement income. LLQP guidelines indicate that DPSP funds can be transferred to a LIRA or similar locked-in accounts under the tax-deferred status until they are eventually converted into income-paying vehicles, like a Life Income Fund (LIF) or a Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF)​​.

Options such as a TFSA or group RRIF are incorrect in this context because TFSAs do not permit direct DPSP transfers and RRIFs are typically used as income-producing accounts rather than transfer vehicles. A LIRA is specifically designed to hold locked-in funds from employer pension plans, allowing Aadi to keep the funds tax-sheltered until he needs to draw income from them during retirement.

A spousal RRSP is beneficial for couples with differing income levels as it allows for income splitting during retirement. This is advantageous because it enables the higher-income spouse to contribute to the RRSP of the lower-income spouse. When the funds are eventually withdrawn during retirement, they are taxed at the lower-income spouse’s rate, potentially reducing the couple’s overall tax burden. This aligns with the LLQP guideline on income splitting as a tax minimization strategy​.

Option B is incorrect because the contributions to a spousal RRSP reduce the contribution room of the contributing spouse, not the recipient. Option C is technically accurate but does not directly address the primary advantage of a spousal RRSP in terms of tax planning, and Option Dis correct regarding extending tax benefits but does not directly highlight the immediate benefit of income splitting for the couple.