Pass CAMS Exam Guide

Using multiple sanctions lists ensures that financial institutions meet international regulatory obligations and can identify sanctions-related risks across different jurisdictions. This comprehensive approach strengthens compliance and reduces the likelihood of exposure to sanctioned individuals or entities.

A: The first step in any suspicious activity investigation is to review the transaction history and other relevant account information to establish context, identify patterns, and determine if the behavior is consistent with known typologies of money laundering.

“The initial phase of an AML investigation is to review relevant account information and transaction activity to assess whether a SAR filing is warranted.”

This approach ensures that any subsequent decisions, such as escalation, SAR filing, or customer outreach, are based on a comprehensive understanding of the facts.

The remote gambling sector presents unique money laundering and terrorist financing risks due to its online, non-face-to-face nature, as recognized in FATF and national regulatory guidance.

A major risk is that customers are not physically present for identification, which increases impersonation and identity fraud risks and requires robust digital onboarding controls.

Another significant risk is the use of anonymous prepaid cards or other anonymous payment methods. These instruments reduce traceability and can be used to introduce illicit funds into gambling platforms with limited customer identification.

Additionally, numerous low-level transactions may indicate structuring behavior designed to avoid enhanced due diligence thresholds and monitoring controls. This tactic allows criminals to layer transactions while appearing consistent with normal gambling behavior.

Large cash deposits are less relevant in remote gambling, as transactions are typically electronic. Betting beyond affordability may indicate problem gambling but is not, by itself, a core AML risk indicator.

Effective AML/CFT policies, controls, and procedures must be risk-based, proportionate, and well-governed, as emphasized by FATF and national regulators. Proportionality ensures that controls are appropriate to the firm’s size, complexity, products, services, and risk exposure.

Senior management approval is essential to establish accountability and tone from the top. Regular review ensures policies remain effective as risks, regulations, and business models evolve.

AML responsibility is shared across the three lines of defense, not owned solely by the business. External validation may support assurance but does not replace internal accountability. While technology can enhance controls, regulators do not mandate the use of advanced or cutting-edge solutions; effectiveness and governance are more important than sophistication.