Online CHRP-KE Questions Video

In HRPA’s Organizational Effectiveness and Workforce Planning and Talent Management domains, HR must diagnose and influence the drivers of performance, engagement, and retention. The framework emphasizes that employees’ emotions shape attitudes (e.g., commitment, satisfaction, trust) and, in turn, behaviours (e.g., performance, collaboration, citizenship, absenteeism, turnover intentions). Recognizing and addressing emotions, therefore, is essential because it directly affects workplace behaviour and organizational results.

While relating to employees (A) and supporting well-being (B) are important, and feeling understood may encourage cooperation (D), the primary performance-linked reason is that emotions drive the attitudes and behaviours that determine organizational outcomes.

Relevant HRPA references: Professional Competency Framework — Organizational Effectiveness (apply behavioural science to influence engagement and performance); Study Guide — Organizational Behaviour (link between affect, attitudes, and work behaviours).

In the HRPA Human Resources Competency Framework (Functional Domain: Learning and Development), training evaluation is a core responsibility of HR professionals. Evaluations measure whether learning objectives were achieved and how the training contributed to organizational goals.

There are two key evaluation types:

Formative Evaluation – Conducted during the training process to monitor and improve design and delivery.

Summative Evaluation – Conducted after training is complete to determine overall effectiveness, learning outcomes, and return on investment.

Extract:

“Summative evaluation measures the overall effectiveness of learning programs after delivery to assess achievement of objectives and organizational impact.”

(HRPA Competency Framework – Learning and Development, Key Competency: Evaluate Learning Programs, CHRP Level)

Therefore, A. Summative is correct because it assesses the effectiveness of training after completion.

Verified Reference Summary:

HRPA Human Resources Competency Framework – Functional Domain: Learning and Development

CHRP Knowledge Exam Blueprint (HRPA, Ontario)

HRPA Exam Preparation Guide – Training Evaluation and Effectiveness

The environmental scanning cycle recognized in HRPA strategy content distinguishes: Scanning (detecting early signals), Monitoring (systematically tracking selected indicators over time), Forecasting (projecting potential outcomes), and Assessing (interpreting organizational implications). The stage that systematically follows key indicators is Monitoring.

HRPA’s Professional Competency Framework positions managers as the primary owners of performance management, with HR designing the system, enabling capability, and ensuring consistency and fairness. Annual appraisal meetings are intended to be a direct, two-way conversation focused on goals, results, feedback, and development—best achieved between the employee and their supervisor. HR’s role is advisory (policy, tools, training, calibration) rather than a routine attendee. Legal participation is exceptional and reserved for complex risk situations, not standard appraisals.

Therefore, the standard composition is the employee and the supervisor.

Relevant Framework Reference (HRPA):

Professional Competency Framework: performance management—building manager capability; HR designs frameworks and advises, line leaders conduct assessments and feedback.

HRPA Study Guide: performance management cycle and roles (manager–employee dialogue; HR oversight, calibration, and compliance).