Download Full Version CHRP-KE HRPA Exam

The essay method is a narrative appraisal technique in which the rater writes a free-form statement describing an employee’s characteristics, behaviours, strengths, weaknesses, and development needs. HRPA’s performance management content distinguishes narrative methods (e.g., essays) from structured techniques such as behavioural checklists (predefined items checked off), behaviour observation scales (systematic observation and rating of defined behaviours), and forced-choice formats (rater selects from keyed statement sets). The hallmark of the essay method is that the evaluator composes a written narrative, rather than completing predetermined scales or checklists.

Relevant HRPA references (no external links): HRPA Study Guide – Performance Management/Appraisal Methods (narrative/essay, checklist, BARS/BOS, and forced-choice distinctions); HRPA Competency Framework – Total Rewards: Performance management processes and tools.

Under the HRPA Human Resources Competency Framework (Functional Domain: Total Rewards) and in alignment with Ontario’s Pay Equity Act, HR professionals must understand and apply legislated pay equity methods to ensure equitable compensation between female and male job classes performing work of equal or comparable value.

The Pay Equity Act (Ontario) defines three methods for establishing pay equity:

Job-to-Job Comparison

Used when both male and female job classes exist.

Female job classes are compared directly to male job classes of equal value to identify pay gaps.

Extract:

“Job-to-job comparisons directly match female and male job classes performing work of equal value.”

(HRPA Total Rewards Knowledge Area: Compensation Equity and Compliance)

Proportional Value Comparison

Used when there are insufficient or no direct male comparator job classes.

This method extrapolates a hypothetical male comparator by analyzing the relationship between job value and pay rates among existing male job classes, then applying that relationship to female job classes.

Extract:

“The proportional value method establishes pay equity when a direct male comparator does not exist by extrapolating a male reference rate using existing male job data.”

(HRPA Competency Framework – Total Rewards, Pay Equity and Compensation Analysis, CHRP Level)

Proxy Comparison

Applies only to the public sector, where there are no male job classes at all.

Uses job data from a comparable organization with male job classes to establish equity.

Permissible Differences

Refers to legally acceptable pay differences (e.g., seniority, merit, skill shortages) that do not constitute pay equity violations.

Therefore, the correct answer is C. Proportional value, as it specifically applies when no direct male comparator job class exists within the organization and relies on extrapolated data from other male job classes.

Verified Reference Summary (HRPA Frameworks and Study Materials):

HRPA Human Resources Competency Framework – Functional Domain: Total Rewards

CHRP Knowledge Exam Blueprint (HRPA, Ontario)

Pay Equity Act (Ontario) – Sections 5–6, Methods of Comparison

HRPA Exam Preparation Guide – Pay Equity and Compensation Compliance

In the HRPA Human Resources Competency Framework (Functional Domain: Labour and Employee Relations), alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods such as mediation, conciliation, and facilitation are encouraged as efficient alternatives to formal arbitration or litigation.

ADR processes are designed to be less costly, less formal, and faster while preserving relationships.

Extract:

“HR professionals promote alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to resolve workplace conflicts efficiently and cost-effectively while maintaining positive employee relations.”

(HRPA Competency Framework – Labour and Employee Relations, CHRP Level, Key Competency: Manage Conflict Resolution and Grievance Processes)

Therefore, B. To avoid the high cost of arbitration is correct, as ADR provides a cost-effective and collaborative alternative to traditional legal or arbitration proceedings.

Verified Reference Summary:

HRPA Human Resources Competency Framework – Functional Domain: Labour and Employee Relations

CHRP Knowledge Exam Blueprint – Conflict and Grievance Management

HRPA Exam Preparation Guide – Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

HRPA guidance on HR audits and analytics outlines a logical audit workflow: define scope and objectives → identify metrics and criteria → collect data → analyze findings → report results → develop and prioritize recommendations → implement improvements and monitor. Once metrics (what will be measured) are established, the immediate next step is to collect the relevant data so analysis can be performed against those metrics.

Recommendations (A) and implementation (D) occur after analysis. Securing senior management approval (B) is part of initiating/scope definition at the front end of the audit process, not after metrics are already identified.

References (HRPA Framework/Study Guide):

HRPA Professional Competency Framework – Reporting and Financial Management (metrics, data collection, analysis, and reporting).

HRPA Study Guide – HR Audits and Analytics (audit steps from scoping through recommendations and follow-up).