New Release SAFe-RTE Scaled Agile Framework Questions

When planning for a distributed PI Planning event with significant time zone differences, it’s crucial to adjust the PI planning agenda to accommodate the time zones involved1. This may involve extending the agenda to 2.5-3 days to allow for overlapping hours where all participants can be actively involved1. The goal is to ensure that every team member, regardless of their location, can contribute to the planning process and that the necessary collaboration and communication occur effectively. This adjustment helps in overcoming the challenges posed by the time zone differences and supports a more inclusive and integrated planning experience for all members of the Agile Release Train (ART)1.

The Release Train Engineer (RTE) is a servant leader and coach for the Agile Release Train (ART). Among their responsibilities, two are particularly relevant to the question:

Escalate ART impediments: RTEs are responsible for communicating with stakeholders, escalating impediments, helping manage risk, and driving relentless improvement1. This involves identifying and addressing issues that may hinder the progress of the ART, ensuring that any obstacles are dealt with promptly.

Facilitate Program Increment (PI) Planning: RTEs play a vital role in facilitating PI Planning, which is a cadence-based, face-to-face event that serves as the heartbeat of the ART1. They help prepare the ART for PI planning by fostering a Continuous Exploration process that drives the synthesis of a vision, a roadmap, and backlogs. During the PI planning event, RTEs facilitate the proceedings, ensuring that all teams on the ART are aligned to a shared mission and vision.

The other options, such as breaking down Features into Stories (A), providing the go/no-go decision for large initiatives ©, and analyzing Epics in the Portfolio Kanban (D), are not primary responsibilities of the RTE as per the SAFe 6 documentation.

During PI Planning in SAFe, it is the responsibility of Product Management to provide the Agile Release Train (ART) context and Vision. The PI Planning event includes a presentation of business context and vision, which is typically delivered by Product Management. This aligns all teams on the ART to a shared mission and vision, which is essential for the planning process. The Release Train Engineer (RTE) facilitates the event, but it is Product Management that presents the vision and context for the upcoming Program Increment (PI)12.

Extending the Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration for additional integration and testing is a bad idea because it disrupts the established cadence and synchronization of the Agile Release Train (ART), which are fundamental to its predictability and efficiency. The SAFe framework emphasizes the importance of maintaining a regular, predictable schedule for iterations and Program Increments (PIs). This regular cadence helps manage the complexity of development and provides a rhythm for the teams to follow1.

Adding time to the IP Iteration for integration and testing could lead to several negative outcomes:

Disruption of Cadence: The ART relies on a set rhythm for iterations and PIs. Changing this rhythm can cause confusion and misalignment among teams.

Impact on Predictability: Predictability in SAFe is achieved through estimation and adherence to iteration lengths. Extending an iteration can skew velocity and estimation metrics, making future planning less reliable.

Reduced Efficiency: The IP Iteration is designed to provide a buffer for meeting PI objectives and to allow time for innovation, learning, and Inspect & Adapt events. Using this time for additional work can reduce the effectiveness of these activities.

Therefore, while it might seem beneficial to extend the IP Iteration to address immediate integration challenges, doing so can undermine the long-term health and performance of the ART by reducing the predictability that comes from consistent cadence and synchronization1.