A designer has created a WLAN design that has been implemented in an organization. The network exists in a four-story building. Because each floor has an identical floor plan, the designer designed only one floor and had the installers duplicate the design on each floor. Now, in validation, it is not performing well. What best explains the problem caused by this process?
When deploying long-distance 802.11 bridge links (10 miles / 16 km), what parameter may be critical for improving data flow by reducing retries caused by the long distances?
You are validating client association capabilities to an 802.1X/EAP secure SSID. The RADIUS server's IP address is 10.100.50.25, and the default RADIUS authentication port is being used. None of the clients can associate with the SSID. After verifying that both the server and the RADIUS service are operational, you find that the authenticator (such as the AP or controller) is not communicating properly with the RADIUS server. What is your next troubleshooting step?
As an implementation engineer, you have just received initial design specs from a network designer for your dual-band 802.11n deployment. The network design documents prescribe the following data rate configuration for the 2.4 GHz radio:
Basic Rates: 5.5, 6, 11, 12 Mbps
Supported Rates: 9, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 54 Mbps as well as MCS 0-15
What will result from this design strategy?