Free Access Scrum PSPO-II New Release

In earlier versions of the Scrum Guide, the Daily Scrum was structured around three specific questions:

What did I do yesterday?

What will I do today?

What impediments are blocking my progress?

However, the latest Scrum Guide (2020 and beyond) no longer prescribes these questions. Instead, it emphasizes that the Daily Scrum is an event for the Developers to inspect progress toward the Sprint Goal and adapt their plan as necessary.

Why the Answer is E (None of the Above):

Scrum no longer mandates specific questions for the Daily Scrum.

The focus is on progress toward the Sprint Goal, not on individual work tracking.

Developers decide how they structure the discussion to improve collaboration and planning.

Time spent (Option D) is not relevant to Scrum’s empirical approach, which values outcomes over effort tracking.

Key Scrum Guide Principles Supporting This Answer:

" The Developers can select whatever structure and techniques they want, as long as their Daily Scrum focuses on progress toward the Sprint Goal and produces an actionable plan for the next day of work. "

" The Daily Scrum is not a status meeting; it is an event to inspect progress and adapt the Sprint Backlog as needed. "

Conclusion:

The Scrum Guide does not require specific questions at the Daily Scrum, making Option E ( " None of the above " ) the correct answer.

 The smallest product Increment that is valuable enough to release is one that delivers a single new or improved outcome for the customers or users of the product. This is because the outcome is the ultimate measure of value, not the output or the features1. An outcome is a change in behavior, attitude, or situation that results from using the product2. An outcome can be achieved by delivering a single feature, fixing a defect, or improving an existing functionality, as long as it meets the Definition of Done and the Sprint Goal3. Therefore, the best answer is A.

The other options are not correct because:

B. Adds a new feature. This is not a sufficient condition, as a new feature may not deliver a valuable outcome if it is not aligned with the product vision, the customer needs, or the market conditions4.

C. Fixes at least one defect. This is not a necessary condition, as a defect may not affect the value of the product if it is minor, rare, or irrelevant to the customer5.

D. Delivers all “must do” Product Backlog items. This is not a realistic condition, as the Product Backlog is a dynamic and emergent artifact that changes based on feedback, learning, and discovery. There is no fixed set of “must do” items that can guarantee the delivery of value. References: 1: Outcome vs. Output, 2: What is an Outcome?, 3: The Definition of Done, 4: Feature vs. Outcome, 5: Defect vs. Value, : The Product Backlog

D is correct because the timebox for the Sprint Review is four hours or less for a one-month Sprint, and usually shorter for shorter Sprints1. The Sprint Review is an event where the Scrum Team and the stakeholders inspect the outcome of the Sprint and collaborate on what to do next1. A is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not an open-ended event, but a timeboxed one that respects the attendees’ time and ensures productivity2. B is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not a point in time, but a timeboxed event that has a specific purpose and agenda1. C is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not the same as the Daily Scrum, which is a 15-minute event for the Developers to synchronize their work1.

The scenario describes a product with low Current Value and high Unrealized Value, meaning that while the product is not currently delivering significant value, there is potential for substantial improvement.

Additionally:

A high product cost ratio (85%) means that a large portion of revenue is being consumed by operating costs, leaving little room for new development.

A long time-to-market suggests inefficiencies in the development and delivery process, preventing rapid iteration and improvement.

Given these conditions, the best long-term strategy is to address the underlying inefficiencies before attempting to innovate.

Analysis of Answer Choices:

Option A: Drop the product (Incorrect)

Abandoning the product is premature, as the Unrealized Value is high.

High Unrealized Value indicates potential customer demand or market opportunity that has not yet been tapped.

A Product Owner should first explore ways to unlock that value before considering discontinuation.

Option B: Improve efficiency by eliminating waste (Correct)

Addressing inefficiencies in product development, delivery, and cost structure is a fundamental step before attempting new innovations.

By reducing waste, improving operational efficiency, and lowering costs, the team can free up resources to invest in new high-value features.

Scrum and Agile emphasize continuous improvement—optimizing processes enables faster, more cost-effective feature development in the future.

Option C: Focus on high-value features despite inefficiencies (Incorrect)

While prioritizing high-value features is important, the lack of capacity and long time-to-market would limit the effectiveness of this strategy.

Without first improving efficiency, the product will continue to struggle with slow delivery, high costs, and missed opportunities.

Key Scrum and Agile Principles Supporting This Answer:

Continuous Improvement: Scrum promotes regular inspection and adaptation to optimize processes and eliminate waste.

Sustainable Development: Focusing on long-term product viability requires fixing systemic inefficiencies before pursuing new growth.

Empirical Process Control: Decisions should be based on data; the data here suggests inefficiencies are a major blocker to success.

Conclusion:

The best approach is to first improve efficiency by eliminating waste, reducing costs, and accelerating time-to-market. Once the team has built a solid foundation, they can then focus on innovation and unlocking the Unrealized Value of the product.