Qlik QSBA2024 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

To fulfill the CFO’s request for an app that allows each regional finance team to access only their data while navigating from a high-level sheet to detail sheets, the combination of adashboard of KPIsandSection Accessis ideal. A dashboard of KPIs provides high-level insights, andSection Accessensures that users from different regions can only see the data relevant to their region. Section Access allows for controlled access to data, ensuring data security and segregation.

Key Concepts:

Dashboard of KPIs: A dashboard displaying key performance indicators (KPIs) gives a high-level overview of financial data, allowing users to quickly assess critical metrics.

Section Access: This Qlik Sense feature controls data access based on user roles, ensuring that users only have access to the data relevant to their region.

Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:

B. Pivot table: A pivot table is useful for detailed analysis but not suitable for designing a navigation structure or controlling access to data by region.

C. Multi KPI with set analysis: While set analysis can filter data, it doesn’t control access at the regional level as effectively as Section Access.

D. Dashboard with regional bookmarks: Bookmarks are user-specific and do not offer security or access control, which is required in this scenario.

References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:

Section Access for Regional Data Control: Qlik Sense recommends Section Access for managing data access when different users need to see only specific subsets of data.

Thus,Ais the best solution because it combines high-level KPIs with robust data access controls using Section Access, making it the correct answer.

Aline chartis the most appropriate visualization for comparing two continuous measures (Profit and Revenue) over time. Line charts are designed to show trends and patterns over a continuous scale (such as time), making it ideal for this scenario where we need to observe how both Profit and Revenue vary across a period.

Key Concepts:

Continuous Scale: Line charts are specifically suited for continuous data like time, making them the preferred choice when tracking changes over time for multiple measures.

Dual Measure Comparison: A line chart allows you to plot two measures on the same axis, making it easy to compare their trends over the same period.

Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:

B. Bullet chart: A bullet chart is used to compare a single measure against a target, not for tracking two measures over time.

C. Bar chart: Bar charts are better suited for comparing categorical data, not continuous measures over time.

D. Scatter plot: Scatter plots are used to compare relationships between two measures but are not suited for continuous time-based comparisons.

References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:

Line Charts for Time Series Data: Line charts are the recommended visualization for comparing multiple measures over time in Qlik Sense, especially when working with continuous data like Profit and Revenue.

Thus, theline chartis the best choice for this scenario, makingAthe correct answer.

In Qlik Sense, the'By Dimension'and'Persistent colors'options in the Colors property panel ensure that the same dimension values have the same color across multiple charts. This is especially useful when you have two or more side-by-side charts sharing a common dimension, like customer names in this case. Persistent colors guarantee consistency in color assignment, helping users visually track the same dimension across different visualizations.

Key Concepts:

By Dimension: This option ensures that each unique value of a dimension (e.g., customer name) gets a distinct color across all charts that use this setting.

Persistent Colors: This feature ensures that the colors remain the same between charts, making the visual comparison across charts easier for the users.

Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A. Use nested IF statements to set the colors by expression for each dimension value: While this would work, it would be unnecessarily complex to maintain and manage, especially with many dimension values.

B. Define the color values in the master measures and use the color library: This would only apply if the goal was to set colors based on measures, not dimensions. In this case, dimension consistency is required, not measure-based coloring.

D. Use the FieldIndex function to set the colors by expression for each dimension value: This would involve writing complex expressions that would not be as straightforward as using the built-in functionality of 'By Dimension' and 'Persistent colors'.

References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:

Color Consistency Across Charts: The 'By Dimension' and 'Persistent colors' settings are recommended in Qlik Sense documentation when creating multi-chart layouts with shared dimensions, ensuring visual coherence across different charts.

ThePersistent colorsandBy Dimensionsettings offer a straightforward and maintainable way to create color associations across charts, making optionCthe verified solution.