IdentityIQ-Associate Exam Dumps : SailPoint Certified IdentityIQ Associate Exam

No. Defining access conditions that violate business policies is not provisioning. In SailPoint IdentityIQ, this activity belongs to governance and policy configuration. Policies define conditions that IdentityIQ should detect as violations, such as separation-of-duty conflicts, prohibited combinations of access, excessive privilege, or access that conflicts with organizational rules. These policies are evaluated against identities, roles, accounts, and entitlements to identify existing or potential violations.

Provisioning is the execution or fulfillment of access changes. Examples of provisioning include creating an account, modifying account attributes, adding or removing entitlements, disabling an account, deleting an account, or generating manual fulfillment work items. A policy violation may influence provisioning by blocking a request, warning the requester, requiring approval, or triggering remediation, but defining the violation condition itself is not a provisioning action.

Therefore, the described action is governance policy definition, not provisioning. Reference topics: Governance, policy configuration, policy detection, preventive policy checking, Provisioning, provisioning plans, remediation, and access-change fulfillment.

No. The “Detect deleted accounts” aggregation task option is not used to ignore accounts that were previously deleted from IdentityIQ. Its purpose is to compare the accounts returned by the current aggregation with the accounts already stored in IdentityIQ for that application. When an account exists in IdentityIQ but is no longer found in the authoritative aggregation results from the source application, IdentityIQ can treat that account as deleted or removed from the target system.

This option helps keep IdentityIQ’s account inventory accurate by identifying stale Links that remain in IdentityIQ even though the corresponding account is no longer present on the application. It is especially important for governance accuracy because certifications, policy checks, identity warehouse views, and access reporting rely on current account and entitlement data.

The statement is incorrect because it reverses the behavior. Detecting deleted accounts is about recognizing accounts missing from the source during aggregation, not ignoring newly returned source accounts that were once deleted in IdentityIQ.

Reference topics: Applications, aggregation task options, account aggregation, deleted account detection, Link maintenance, IdentityCube account data, and application data reconciliation.

No. Marking an attribute as multi-valued does not, by itself, cause IdentityIQ to treat that attribute as an entitlement or include its values in the Entitlement Catalog. In an application schema, the multi-valued setting only indicates that the account attribute can contain more than one value. It describes data structure, not governance meaning.

To include access values in the Entitlement Catalog, the relevant schema attribute must be configured as an entitlement-bearing attribute, or group objects must be properly configured and aggregated through the application’s group schema where applicable. IdentityIQ then recognizes those values as governable access rights and can represent them as managed attributes in the Entitlement Catalog. Once cataloged, they can be reviewed, certified, requested, described, owned, risk-scored, and governed by policy.

For example, an account attribute such as “groups” may be multi-valued, but IdentityIQ must also know that those values represent access rights. Without entitlement configuration, the aggregation stores attribute values on the account but does not properly model them as catalog entitlements.

Reference topics: Access Modeling, Entitlement Catalog, managed attributes, application schema attributes, entitlement attribute configuration, group schema, and account aggregation.