GRCP Exam Dumps : GRC Professional Certification Exam

To ensure that notifications are addressed appropriately, organizations must have a structured process to handle and route them effectively. This ensures that critical issues are dealt with by the right organizational units in a timely and efficient manner.

Key Steps to Handle Notifications Effectively:

Prioritization:Notifications should be ranked based on their urgency, potential impact, and severity.

Substantiation and Validation:Notifications should be reviewed to confirm their authenticity and relevance.

Routing:Based on the topic, type, and severity, notifications should be sent to the appropriate department or personnel (e.g., HR, compliance, legal, or risk management).

Why Option B is Correct:

Option B outlines a systematic approach to ensure notifications are prioritized and routed to the appropriate units for action.

Option A (single point referral) oversimplifies the process and may delay action or lead to mismanagement.

Option C (disregarding notifications) is counterproductive and could result in ignoring critical issues.

Option D (general counsel review of all notifications) is impractical and unnecessary for routine issues.

Relevant Frameworks and Guidelines:

ISO 37002 (Whistleblowing Management System):Recommends clear processes for handling and routing notifications based on type and severity.

COSO ERM Framework:Highlights the importance of routing risk-related information to the appropriate organizational units for timely action.

In summary, notifications should beprioritized, substantiated, validated, and routedbased on their nature and severity to ensure they are handled by the appropriate organizational units.

Legal and regulatory factors are critical components of an organization’sexternal contextand include the framework of laws, regulations, and judicial decisions that govern its operations. These factors are external because they are created and enforced by entities outside the organization and must be monitored and addressed proactively.

Key Examples of Legal and Regulatory Factors:

Laws and Rules:

National and international laws, such asGDPRfor data privacy orSOXfor financial reporting.

Industry-specific laws, such asHIPAAfor healthcare.

Regulations:

Standards set by regulatory authorities likeSEC,FDA, orEU Directivesthat must be adhered to.

Litigation:

Ongoing or potential legal actions that may influence operational and reputational risks.

Judicial or Administrative Opinions:

Court rulings or administrative guidelines that create precedents and influence compliance requirements.

Why Option C is Correct:

Option C encompasses thebroadest and most accurate examplesof external legal and regulatory factors that influence the organization's context.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

A: Market research, customer feedback, and competitive analysis relate to business strategy, not legal and regulatory factors.

B: Coordination of legal activities is an internal operational process, not an external factor.

D: Enforcement actions and litigation against the company are outcomes of non-compliance, not examples of external regulatory factors.

References and Resources:

ISO 31000:2018– Risk Management Guidelines (emphasis on legal and regulatory external context).

COSO ERM Framework– Identifies external legal and regulatory factors as part of the operating environment.

GDPR and HIPAA Compliance Frameworks– Examples of regulatory external factors.