CDFOM Exam Dumps : Certified Data Center Facilities Operations Manager

In the EPI framework for risk management, after the risk identification and risk analysis steps, therisk evaluationstep determines whether the assessed risks areacceptableorrequire treatmentbased on the organization’s risk appetite, criteria, and the potential impact. The evaluation leads to a decision on whether risk treatment needs to take place.

It isnotsimply compiling all risks (so option C is incorrect).

It isnotexclusively about budgeting (so option D is incorrect) though budgeting follows treatment decisions.

It isnotnecessarily advising to accept all risks (so option B is incorrect) but rather it supports decision-making on treatment.

Therefore, option A is correct: the outcome is the decision whether to treat the risk.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts

Risk evaluation assesses identified and analysed risks against risk criteria to decide on acceptability or need for treatment.

The outcome is a documented decision-making step in the risk management process.

KPOs are strategic and operational performance objectives that must support:

Daily operations

Weekly operational control

Monthly service reporting

Quarterly reviews

Annual strategic planning

EPI emphasizes that performance objectives must be measurableacross multiple timeframes, depending on the operational layer:

Weekly→ short-term operational checks

Monthly→ service-level analysis and trend review

Yearly→ strategic improvement and long-term performance planning

Therefore,weekly, monthly, and yearly intervalsare all suitable for KPOs.

Thus,Dis correct.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

Performance measurement occurs across multiple time horizons.

KPOs must be aligned to operational, tactical, and strategic levels.

EPI’s financial management guidance distinguishes between several internal cost transparency models.Chargebackoccurs when costs are formally billed to internal departments or customers. However, in this scenario, management wants visibility of cost distributionwithoutmaking business units financially responsible. This aligns directly with theShow Backmodel.

Show Back is a non-billing mechanism that reports how much each business unit would hypothetically be charged if costs were allocated proportionally. It improves cost awareness, encourages responsible consumption, and helps management understand operational cost drivers without generating friction associated with real billing. Show Back is commonly used in organizations where financial culture, policy constraints, or strategic choices prevent the use of formal chargeback.

Options A (Chargeback) does not meet the requirement because it transfers costs. Options C and D are not recognized cost transparency models within EPI or general IT financial management practices.

Therefore, the most suitable model for cost transparencywithout financial transferisB – Show Back.