AD0-E902 Exam Dumps : Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Problem Summary:

A trigger module is causing excessive iteration processing thousands of bundles unnecessarily.

The goal is to optimize the scenario by reducing the number of processed bundles.

Option Analysis:

A. Configure the trigger module to reduce the maximum number of results:

Reducing the maximum number of results processed per cycle limits the number of bundles processed at a time, but it does not solve the root issue of processing unnecessary records.

B. Configure the trigger module to filter out unnecessary records:

Filtering at the trigger level ensures that only the required records are fetched for processing, addressing the root cause of excessive bundle processing. This is the correct answer.

C. Configure scenario settings to reduce cycles per execution:

Limiting execution cycles reduces the overall runtime but does not directly address the number of bundles being processed unnecessarily.

Why Filtering at the Trigger is Best:

Efficiency: By setting up filters directly in the trigger, you ensure that only relevant data is retrieved.

Performance: Reducing the number of unnecessary bundles improves processing speed and reduces resource usage.

Accuracy: Filtering ensures only actionable data enters the workflow, maintaining scenario integrity.

How to Implement:

Open the trigger module settings.

Add appropriate filters to exclude unnecessary records. For example:

Add conditions to filter out old data or irrelevant statuses.

Use fields like updatedDate, status, or any other criteria relevant to the workflow.

Test the trigger module to verify that only relevant bundles are retrieved.

References:These answers are based on Workfront Fusion best practices for optimizing scenarios, as outlined in the Fusion documentation. Proper use of mapping panel functions and trigger filters ensures scenarios are efficient and scalable.

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Understanding the Problem:

The scenario is triggered by a project status update.

After the scenario runs, it updates the project status again, which re-triggers the scenario, creating aloop.

The goal is to prevent the scenario from re-triggering itself.

Option Analysis:

A. When using instant triggers, finish the scenario with the Break directive to prevent the record from being updated again:

Incorrect. The Break directive is not used to prevent updates; it is used to stop further iterations of a scenario. It does not address the root cause of the loop, which is the re-triggering by updated records.

B. Create a filter after the instant trigger that only passes records that have not been updated by Fusion:

Correct. Adding a filter ensures that only records not recently updated by Fusion are processed. This prevents Fusion from re-triggering itself on the same record.

For example, you could use a condition to check if the Last Updated By field does not equal the Fusion user or if the Last Update Date is older than a certain threshold.

C. Schedule the instant trigger to only run at intervals to prevent Fusion from thinking the record has been updated after each run:

Incorrect. Instant triggers are event-driven, and their purpose is to respond to changes immediately. Scheduling them would negate the benefit of instant triggers and does not solve the root problem.

Why Filtering Records is Best:

Targeted Control: A filter after the trigger ensures only relevant updates (e.g., those not caused by Fusion) are processed.

Prevents Loops: By excluding records updated by Fusion, the scenario avoids re-triggering itself.

Maintains Performance: Filtering prevents unnecessary processing of irrelevant records, improving efficiency.

How to Implement:

After the instant trigger module, add a filter module.

Configure the filter to check the Last Updated By field or a custom flag indicating if the update was performed by Fusion.

Example: Last Updated By ≠ Fusion User or Update Flag ≠ True.

If a custom flag is used, ensure the flag is set when Fusion updates the record.

Alternative Solutions:

Add a custom field (e.g., "Updated by Fusion") that Fusion sets when it updates a record. This can also be used in the filter condition.

References:This approach aligns with Fusion best practices for preventing infinite loops caused by scenarios re-triggering themselves. Filtering ensures the scenario runs only when necessary, avoiding redundant processing and maintaining performance.

When dealing with intermittent errors, such as "service is not reachable," the default error handling in Adobe Workfront Fusion is often sufficient to improve execution success rates.

Default Error Handling:

Fusion automatically retries operations when transient errors, such as network or connection issues, occur.

By leveraging this built-in functionality, the system will attempt to re-execute the failing module after a brief delay, which is often enough for the external service to become reachable again.

Why Not Other Options?

A. Adding an error handler that will notify the system owner: While notifying the owner can be useful for monitoring purposes, it does not directly address improving the success rate of executions.

C. Adding a Break directive to the module: Adding a Break directive will stop the execution entirely, which is counterproductive in this case, as the service typically becomes reachable again after a short time.

References:

Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Default Error Handling Mechanisms

Experience League Community: Managing Intermittent API Errors in Fusion