Microsoft MB-820 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

 Add Clear(PurchaseLine); as a line before line 01 of the code: No

 Add PurchaseLine.SetFilter("Line No."; '>0') as a line after line 06: Yes

 Change the filter on line 06 from a "No." field to a "Document No." field: No

 Remove "not" in line 07: No

 Add Clear(PurchaseLine); as a line before line 01 of the code.

No

You do not need to clear the PurchaseLine record before running the query, because the SetRange filters will take care of setting the correct context.

 Add PurchaseLine.SetFilter("Line No."; '>0') as a line after line 06.

Yes

Adding a SetFilter on the "Line No." field ensures that you're checking for actual purchase lines greater than 0, which are valid lines. This would fix the issue where the check might return false even when lines exist.

 Change the filter on line 06 from a "No." field to a "Document No." field.

No

The filter on the No. field is correct, as it's filtering based on the purchase order number. Changing this to Document No. is unnecessary.

 Remove "not" in line 07.

No

The not in line 07 is necessary because IsEmpty() returns true when no lines are found. To correctly return a boolean indicating whether the purchase order has lines, you need to negate the result of IsEmpty().

To roll back changes to a test method after run time, you should:

Set the TransactionModel attribute to AutoRollback.

To run an approve action on a test page named TestPageA, you should:

Configure TestPageA.Approve.Invoke().

In Business Central's testing framework, the TransactionModel attribute can be set to AutoRollback. This ensures that any changes made during the test are rolled back after the test is complete, leaving the database in its original state.

For running an action on a test page, you would use the 'Invoke' method on the action you wish to perform. In this case, to run an approve action on TestPageA, you would use TestPageA.Approve.Invoke() within your test codeunit. This simulates the user action of approving something on the page.

These actions ensure that the testing environment is properly set up to test specific functionalities without persisting test data and to invoke actions as part of the test scenarios.

In the context provided by the case study, when calling an API action from a mobile application, the correct format for a POST request to an action in Business Central typically involves specifying the entity (/issues), the ID of the entity (88122e0e-5796-ec11-bb87-000d3a392eb5), and the action to be called (/Copy). The action name should match the exact name as defined in the AL code, which is case-sensitive.

Option A is incorrect because it uses a non-standard format for the action call.

Option B uses the PATCH method, which is generally used for update operations, not for calling actions.

Option C is correct as it uses the POST method, which is appropriate for calling actions, and correctly specifies the entity, ID, and action name.

Option D is incorrect because the action name /copy is in lowercase, while AL is case-sensitive, and it should match the case exactly as defined in the code.

Option E incorrectly adds 'MicrosoftNAV' before the action name, which is not standard for calling actions in Business Central APIs.

Hence, the correct action to use when calling the Issue API action from the mobile application is given in Option C.