Juniper JN0-336 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The correct answers are A and B. In SRX chassis clustering, the fabric link, represented by fab interfaces, is the data-plane connection between the two cluster nodes. Juniper describes the fabric as the back-to-back data connection used when traffic on one node must be processed on the other node or must exit through an interface on the other node; session-state information also passes over the fabric. This is especially visible in active/active clustering, where ingress and egress interfaces can reside on different nodes and transit traffic must cross the fabric link.

Option B is also correct because the fabric link still exists in active/passive clustering for cluster data-plane synchronization and inter-node state handling, even though active/passive designs minimize fabric transit traffic because only one node normally forwards traffic at a time. Juniper specifically states that active/passive mode minimizes traffic over the fabric link, not that the fabric link is unused.

Options C and D are not the intended answers. The cluster is identified by a configured cluster ID, and each chassis is identified by a node ID, but the fabric interface names themselves are not where the cluster ID is reflected. Reference topics: HA Clustering, fabric link, active/active clustering, active/passive clustering, session synchronization, inter-node traffic.

The correct answer is B. ip-notify. When administrators want visibility without enforcement impact, ip-notify is the correct IP action. Juniper Security Director documentation defines IP Notify as an IP action that does not take any action against future traffic but logs the event. That is exactly the requirement in the question: traffic matching the IDP condition must not be blocked, closed, or rate-limited until administrators have reviewed the events and decided whether enforcement is appropriate.

Option A, ip-block, is wrong because it blocks future packets matching the IP action rule. That would immediately impact traffic. Option C, ip-connection-rate-limit, is wrong because it limits the connection rate and therefore changes traffic behavior before administrators complete evaluation. Option D, ip-close, is also wrong because it closes matching future sessions by sending reset packets to the client and server, which is disruptive. In a safe evaluation or tuning phase, the proper approach is to log and observe first, then move to stronger actions such as block, close, or rate-limit only after the detected condition has been validated. Reference topics: IDP IP actions, ip-notify, event logging, non-disruptive evaluation mode, IDP policy tuning.

The correct answers are B and D. A terminal rule is specifically designed to stop further rule evaluation. Juniper states that the IDP rule-matching algorithm normally checks traffic against all matching rules in the rulebase, but when a terminal rule matches the source, destination, zones, and application, IDP does not continue to check subsequent rules for that same traffic. Juniper also warns that traffic matching a terminal rule is not compared to later rules even if it does not match the attack object inside that terminal rule.

Option D is also correct because the Ignore Connection action stops scanning traffic for the rest of the connection if an attack match is found. Juniper defines Ignore Connection as disabling the rulebase for that specific connection after a match. Option A is wrong because a close action closes the connection by sending reset behavior, but it is not the rule-processing control mechanism being tested. Option C is a trap: the exempt rulebase is used to suppress known false positives after an IPS rule match, but the two direct mechanisms that end IDP rule processing are terminal rule matching and ignore connection. Reference topics: IDP rulebases, terminal rules, Ignore Connection action, rule-matching algorithm, false-positive exemption.